Value
9.8/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.04
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Wabash National shows a weak Piotroski F-Score of 1 out of 9 and no competitive moat, confirming the engine's quality-below-floor flag. Quality breakdown | Piotroski F-Score should recover to 4 or higher over the next 2 quarters if the underlying quality deterioration is temporary. | →Stable |
| CounterA single-period Piotroski score can understate quality during a cyclical trough in heavy-equipment demand. | ||
A death-cross technical pattern has triggered a hard block on the trade setup, even as MACD shows early signs of improvement. Engine gate (failed) | The stock should reclaim its 200-day moving average within 2 quarters if the death-cross signal is set to reverse. | →Stable |
| CounterDeath crosses in cyclical industrials can persist for many months once a demand downturn is underway. | ||
Wabash National's revenue is declining 20% YoY, reflecting a real deterioration in demand rather than a one-quarter blip. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should turn positive within 2 quarters if the downturn is set to bottom. | →Stable |
| CounterTrailer manufacturing demand is highly cyclical, so a 20% decline can be part of a normal freight-cycle trough rather than a structural problem. | ||
Analyst estimates have fallen 41.3% over the last 30 days, a sentiment proxy that signals deteriorating forward expectations. Sentiment breakdown | Consensus estimates should stabilize or rise over the next 30-60 days if the estimate-cutting cycle is ending. | →Stable |
| CounterSharp estimate cuts for a thinly-covered stock (1 analyst) can be driven by a single model revision rather than a broad consensus shift. | ||
An elevated put/call ratio of 7.25 signals heavy defensive options positioning against Wabash National. Key risks | The put/call ratio should compress toward 2.0 or below over the next quarter if the defensive positioning unwinds. | →Stable |
| CounterA very high put/call ratio at a small-float industrial name can reflect a handful of large hedges rather than a broad bearish consensus. | ||
CounterA single-period Piotroski score can understate quality during a cyclical trough in heavy-equipment demand.
CounterDeath crosses in cyclical industrials can persist for many months once a demand downturn is underway.
CounterTrailer manufacturing demand is highly cyclical, so a 20% decline can be part of a normal freight-cycle trough rather than a structural problem.
CounterSharp estimate cuts for a thinly-covered stock (1 analyst) can be driven by a single model revision rather than a broad consensus shift.
CounterA very high put/call ratio at a small-float industrial name can reflect a handful of large hedges rather than a broad bearish consensus.
Wabash National's quality has broken down — a Piotroski F-Score of 1/9, a 20% YoY revenue decline, and a death-cross hard block — while falling analyst estimates (-41.3%) and a 7.25 put/call ratio point to continued near-term pressure despite a statistically cheap valuation.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| Moat | 2.5 |
| Piotroski F | 1.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.4 |
| MACD | 2.2 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 8.0 |
| Volume | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.9 |
| Price target | 9.8 |
| erm sentiment | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.6 |
| quality rank | 0.6 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.2 |
| support resistance | 3.0 |
| 52w position | 7.2 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.3 |
| days to cover | 5.7 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 1.7 |
| beta | 5.3 |
| debt equity | 3.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 7.5 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.8 |
| dividend safety | 9.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.42>1.3, MCap $0.5B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.8 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.7<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.8, Sentiment at 8.3, and Insider at 7.5; the weakest are Quality at 1.1, Peer rank at 2.5, and Momentum at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.57 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score rises above 5 out of 9 from the current 1, showing quality has meaningfully improved.
Trip ifThe stock closes back above its 200-day moving average for more than 10 consecutive sessions, reversing the death-cross signal.
Trip ifRevenue growth turns positive and exceeds 0% YoY, reversing the current -20% decline.
Trip ifConsensus EPS estimates stabilize and rise by more than 10% over 30 days, reversing the current -41.3% estimate cut.
Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 2.0 from the current 7.25, unwinding the elevated hedging pressure.