Skip to main content
VNTVontier CorporationHold5.1·$35.89
VNT · Why this verdict

Why Vontier (VNT) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.1/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Vontier Corporation trades at an attractive forward price-to-earnings of 8x with an excellent return on equity of 35% and analyst consensus implying 38% upside, but carries significant debt leverage, declining earnings estimates, the most recent quarter missed estimates, and the stock is in a confirmed downtrend below its 200-day moving average.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

A forward price-to-earnings of 8.0x and a price-to-earnings growth ratio of 0.88 alongside a peer-leading valuation rank indicate the stock offers significant value relative to its cash-generating capacity, with analysts implying 38% upside to a consensus target.

↓Deteriorating
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Forward price-to-earnings stays below 12x over the next 12 months, maintaining the valuation discount.

CounterBelow-the-200-day-moving-average positioning with declining analyst estimates suggests the apparent valuation discount may be a value trap if earnings revisions accelerate to the downside.

A return on equity of 35% and a Piotroski financial-strength score of 7 out of 9 reflect that Vontier generates strong returns on shareholder capital, with operating margins and quality scores ranking above average within its peer group.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Return on equity stays above 25% over the next 12 months, sustaining the high-return characteristic.

CounterHigh return on equity in a company with significant debt-to-equity leverage can be amplified by financial engineering rather than operational excellence, creating fragility in a rising rate environment.

Analyst earnings estimates have been trending downward, the most recent quarter produced a 17% miss, and estimates for the business are declining, indicating that the near-term earnings trajectory is weakening relative to prior expectations.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
Earnings surprise turns positive in at least 2 of the next 3 reported quarters, signaling the estimate decline has bottomed.

CounterThree of the four prior quarters delivered positive surprises of 1-10%, and the May 2026 miss may have been a one-time event; the baseline remains a mostly beat-oriented company.

Despite the price trading below the 200-day moving average with that average declining at 4.4% per month, the MACD is improving and on-balance volume is rising, forming a recovery-setup pattern that could lead the price back above trend.

→Stable
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Stock price rises above its 200-day moving average and holds above it for at least 20 consecutive trading days within the next 6 months.

CounterRecovering MACD in a downtrend often produces false signals; the confirmed downtrend at minus 4.4% slope per month is severe enough that it typically requires multiple months to reverse.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E8.0
P/S9.3
EV/EBITDA6.3
Fwd P/E9.4
PEG7.9
Analyst target4.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 9.5x
  • ▸PEG: 0.86
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE9.6
ROA5.8
Gross margin5.4
Op margin7.8
Net margin5.7
Current ratio4.8
FCF quality7.0
Moat5.0
Piotroski F4.4
  • ▸Excellent ROE: 29%
  • ▸No competitive moat

Growth

1.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth2.0
EPS growth0.0
  • ▸Declining revenue: -2%

Momentum

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.8
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position7.5
Volume4.0
  • ▸Overbought (RSI 85)
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat/negative + RSI 85 (late-cycle distribution risk)

Sentiment

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.0
Analyst rating7.0
Price target7.0
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (10.0) — signal dampened

Insider

5.2/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.3
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank9.4
quality rank6.5
growth rank0.0
  • ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
  • ▸Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

1.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.0
support resistance0.2
52w position4.9

Risk (lower is worse)

4.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest4.0
days to cover0.8
volatility7.0
put call10.0
implied vol3.4
max pain risk3.0
beta6.5
debt equity3.8
  • ▸Above max pain $22
  • ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg4.2
dividend safety6.8
news activity5.0
  • ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
  • ▸Earnings in 5 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position. | News modifier +1 (SELL_IF_HOLDING → HOLD_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:7.1>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.1=NEGATIVE
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:5d<=7d
Warning (1)
  • DEATH_CROSS:momentum=7.1>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
-0.08
Upside
-1.0%
Downside
12.9%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 85

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $4.9B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.3 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.1=NEGATIVE, EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:5d<=7d) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.08 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.4, Momentum at 7.1, and Sentiment at 6.3; the weakest are Growth at 1.0, Technical at 1.7, and Peer rank at 4.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.08 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Attractive Low Forward Pe Valuation

    Trip ifForward price-to-earnings rises above 14x while earnings estimates continue declining, indicating valuation expansion without earnings support.

  • P2High Return On Equity Quality

    Trip ifReturn on equity drops below 20% in any reported quarter over the next 12 months.

  • P3Earnings Estimate Decline Trend

    Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters, suggesting the estimate revision cycle has not bottomed.

  • P4Confirmed Downtrend Recovery Setup

    Trip if200-day moving average slope falls below minus 6% per month, indicating an acceleration of the downtrend.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › VNT › Why this verdict