Skip to main content
VHI · Why this verdict

Why Valhi (VHI) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Valhi is a deeply discounted chemicals holding (4.4x forward P/E, 8/9 Piotroski) whose earnings are highly concentrated in TiO2 and a few customers, with below-floor quality and weak margins.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Concentration is the dominant risk: 90.0% of the Chemicals segment depends on TiO2, a single commodity product.

↓Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
TiO2 pricing and volumes stabilize so segment results hold over 12 months.

CounterConcentration in a commodity pigment can be a strength at the cycle trough, and the business has conservative debt levels relative to peers.

Price is below its 200-day average but the average is still rising 3.4% per 30 days, a pullback in an uptrend rather than confirmed weakness, although on-balance volume is falling.

↑Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price reclaims its 200-day moving average and the momentum score rises above 4.5 within 12 months.

CounterFalling on-balance volume and a momentum score of 3.4/10 suggest distribution, and the pullback may deepen.

The Component Products segment relies on its top ten customers for 52.0% of sales, creating exposure to the loss of a single large account.

↓Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
Top-ten customer share stays at or below 52% of segment sales over 12 months.

CounterLong-standing customer relationships in component products are sticky, and a concentration ratio of 52% across ten buyers is not extreme.

Quality is below the 4.0 floor at 3.3/10: operating margin scores 2.7/10 and ROE and net margin score 0, with no competitive moat despite a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Operating margin and net margin recover enough to lift the quality score above 4.0 within 12 months.

CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 suggests improving fundamentals, so depressed margins may be cyclical and close to trough.

Valuation is very cheap with a forward P/E of 4.4x, and quarterly revenue has risen to $606M from $540M a year earlier.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Quarterly revenue holds above $550M and forward earnings estimates support the 4.4x forward multiple.

CounterA low multiple on cyclical chemicals earnings can signal peak profits, and there is no analyst target to confirm upside.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

8.8/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
P/S10.0
EV/EBITDA4.0
Fwd P/E10.0
PEG10.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 4.3x
  • ▸PEG: 0.00
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

3.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.3
Gross margin0.0
Op margin2.7
Net margin0.0
Current ratio9.6
Moat5.0
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

5.5/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth5.5

Momentum

2.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.5
MACD6.8
OBV1.0
MA position2.2
Volume1.1
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+2.9%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

5.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

5.8/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.5
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

6.7/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank8.6
quality rank4.5
growth rank5.4
  • ▸Conservative debt levels

Technical

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger8.4
support resistance8.6
52w position4.7
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.7
days to cover4.8
volatility3.1
beta6.8
debt equity8.3
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 3 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
dividend safety8.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • ▸Earnings in 7 days
  • ▸Dividend aristocrat: 2.3% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Market cap $396M below $400M minimum. Not in investable universe.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:MARKET_CAP
Passed (4)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:2.9<4.5
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:7d<=7d
Warning (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
7.5%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeSector Rotation — Basic Materials sector out of favor, value=8.8

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B

Investment implication

The HOLD_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.9<4.5 outcome against Value at 8.8 and asymmetric R:R of 0.00.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.8, Technical at 6.9, and Peer rank at 6.7; the weakest are Momentum at 2.9, Quality at 3.3, and Sentiment at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Tio2 Product Concentration

    Trip ifTiO2 share of Chemicals segment sales exceeds 95% from the current 90.0%.

  • P2Customer Concentration Component Products

    Trip ifTop ten customers' share of Component Products sales exceeds 60% from the current 52.0%.

  • P3Low Quality Thin Margins

    Trip ifQuality score falls below 3.0/10 from the current 3.3.

  • P4Cheap Valuation Cyclical Trough

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $500M from the latest $606M.

  • P5Pullback In Rising Trend

    Trip ifShare price drops to below the $13.39 support level.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › VHI › Why this verdict