Value
8.8/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 4.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.00
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Valhi is a deeply discounted chemicals holding (4.4x forward P/E, 8/9 Piotroski) whose earnings are highly concentrated in TiO2 and a few customers, with below-floor quality and weak margins.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Concentration is the dominant risk: 90.0% of the Chemicals segment depends on TiO2, a single commodity product. Bear case | TiO2 pricing and volumes stabilize so segment results hold over 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterConcentration in a commodity pigment can be a strength at the cycle trough, and the business has conservative debt levels relative to peers. | ||
Price is below its 200-day average but the average is still rising 3.4% per 30 days, a pullback in an uptrend rather than confirmed weakness, although on-balance volume is falling. Momentum breakdown | Price reclaims its 200-day moving average and the momentum score rises above 4.5 within 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterFalling on-balance volume and a momentum score of 3.4/10 suggest distribution, and the pullback may deepen. | ||
The Component Products segment relies on its top ten customers for 52.0% of sales, creating exposure to the loss of a single large account. Bear case | Top-ten customer share stays at or below 52% of segment sales over 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterLong-standing customer relationships in component products are sticky, and a concentration ratio of 52% across ten buyers is not extreme. | ||
Quality is below the 4.0 floor at 3.3/10: operating margin scores 2.7/10 and ROE and net margin score 0, with no competitive moat despite a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9. Quality breakdown | Operating margin and net margin recover enough to lift the quality score above 4.0 within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 suggests improving fundamentals, so depressed margins may be cyclical and close to trough. | ||
Valuation is very cheap with a forward P/E of 4.4x, and quarterly revenue has risen to $606M from $540M a year earlier. Valuation breakdown | Quarterly revenue holds above $550M and forward earnings estimates support the 4.4x forward multiple. | →Stable |
| CounterA low multiple on cyclical chemicals earnings can signal peak profits, and there is no analyst target to confirm upside. | ||
CounterConcentration in a commodity pigment can be a strength at the cycle trough, and the business has conservative debt levels relative to peers.
CounterFalling on-balance volume and a momentum score of 3.4/10 suggest distribution, and the pullback may deepen.
CounterLong-standing customer relationships in component products are sticky, and a concentration ratio of 52% across ten buyers is not extreme.
CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 suggests improving fundamentals, so depressed margins may be cyclical and close to trough.
CounterA low multiple on cyclical chemicals earnings can signal peak profits, and there is no analyst target to confirm upside.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.3 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 2.7 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.6 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 6.8 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 1.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.5 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.6 |
| quality rank | 4.5 |
| growth rank | 5.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 8.4 |
| support resistance | 8.6 |
| 52w position | 4.7 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.7 |
| days to cover | 4.8 |
| volatility | 3.1 |
| beta | 6.8 |
| debt equity | 8.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 8.0 |
Market cap $396M below $400M minimum. Not in investable universe.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:MARKET_CAPSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeSector Rotation — Basic Materials sector out of favor, value=8.8
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B
The HOLD_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.9<4.5 outcome against Value at 8.8 and asymmetric R:R of 0.00.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.8, Technical at 6.9, and Peer rank at 6.7; the weakest are Momentum at 2.9, Quality at 3.3, and Sentiment at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifTiO2 share of Chemicals segment sales exceeds 95% from the current 90.0%.
Trip ifTop ten customers' share of Component Products sales exceeds 60% from the current 52.0%.
Trip ifQuality score falls below 3.0/10 from the current 3.3.
Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $500M from the latest $606M.
Trip ifShare price drops to below the $13.39 support level.