Value
8.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 4.4x
- ▸PEG: 0.02
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At a $0.4 billion market cap, the stock sits below the reach of many institutional investors, an edge the engine flags that can leave shares under-owned and mispriced relative to fundamentals. Edge rationale | As market cap grows or institutional ownership increases over the next 12 months, this constraint-driven mispricing edge should narrow as the price adjusts. | →Stable |
| CounterBeing below institutional reach can also reflect genuine below-average business quality, as flagged in the key risks, rather than solely a size-driven mispricing. | ||
Valhi trades at a deeply discounted valuation with a forward P/E of 4.4x and a PEG ratio of 0.02, the primary basis for its value score of 8.0. Valuation breakdown | The forward P/E should remain below 7x over the next 12 months to sustain the deep-value case. | →Stable |
| CounterA quality score below the engine's floor suggests the extreme cheapness may reflect genuine business deterioration in a mature chemicals business rather than a market mispricing. | ||
The stock's quality score of 2.8 sits below the engine's 4.0 minimum floor, triggering an exit recommendation, with no discernible competitive moat. Bear case | The quality score should climb back above the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months for the exit call to be reconsidered. | →Stable |
| CounterA solid Piotroski F-Score of 6.7 out of 9 suggests underlying financial-statement strength that argues against the severity of the quality floor breach. | ||
The stock is in a technical breakout with a golden cross, trading above all moving averages with bullish MACD, though it just failed the engine's momentum gate at 4.4 against the 4.5 threshold, with the 200-day moving average slope described as flat. Engine gate (failed) | The momentum score should climb past 4.5 over the next 2 quarters to clear the gate and confirm the breakout. | →Stable |
| CounterFalling on-balance volume alongside a flat moving-average slope suggests the breakout lacks strong underlying buying conviction. | ||
The engine flags upside as exhausted with an asymmetry ratio of 0.0 and 0% implied upside at current levels. Gates warning | A new positive-asymmetry setup with upside above 5% should emerge over the next 12 months for the exhausted-upside flag to clear. | →Stable |
| CounterA high dividend-safety reading of 222% suggests the total-return case may not depend entirely on price asymmetry. | ||
CounterBeing below institutional reach can also reflect genuine below-average business quality, as flagged in the key risks, rather than solely a size-driven mispricing.
CounterA quality score below the engine's floor suggests the extreme cheapness may reflect genuine business deterioration in a mature chemicals business rather than a market mispricing.
CounterA solid Piotroski F-Score of 6.7 out of 9 suggests underlying financial-statement strength that argues against the severity of the quality floor breach.
CounterFalling on-balance volume alongside a flat moving-average slope suggests the breakout lacks strong underlying buying conviction.
CounterA high dividend-safety reading of 222% suggests the total-return case may not depend entirely on price asymmetry.
Valhi trades at a deeply discounted 4.4x forward P/E within a technical breakout setup, but a quality score below the engine's floor, a narrowly failed momentum gate, and an asymmetry reading flagging exhausted upside argue the cheapness may reflect real fundamental weakness rather than mispricing.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 2.2 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.8 |
| Moat | 3.9 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.5 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 3.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 3.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.7 |
| quality rank | 4.2 |
| growth rank | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.8 |
| support resistance | 5.5 |
| 52w position | 4.0 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.8 |
| days to cover | 6.6 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| beta | 7.3 |
| debt equity | 8.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupRange Bound — RSI 42 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.4B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 8.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.6<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.0, Insider at 7.5, and Peer rank at 6.9; the weakest are Momentum at 2.6, Quality at 2.8, and Sentiment at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 8x from the current 4.4x.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from the current 2.8.
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 3.5 from the current 4.4.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio rises above 1.5 from the current 0.0.
Trip ifMarket capitalization rises above $1.5 billion from the current $0.4 billion.