Value
9.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 16.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.16
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The bear case flags quality at 2.3, below the 4.0 floor, part of three value-trap signals including margin compression, material insider selling, and negative free cash flow. Bear case | The quality score should climb above 4.0 and the value-trap signal count should drop from 3 out of 5 over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe current ratio of 9.4 shows very substantial near-term liquidity, giving ample runway to absorb continued cash burn. | ||
Sentiment notes cite 117% analyst upside, consistent with the engine's asymmetry gate passing at a ratio of 8.52, among the highest in the bundle, against a 1.5 threshold. Sentiment breakdown | Analyst upside should stay elevated and the asymmetry ratio should hold well above the 1.5 gate threshold over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterLight analyst coverage is explicitly flagged as dampening the signal, and the position-size recommendation is still avoid given the institutional-constrained edge type for this $0.6B market cap. | ||
The momentum gate failed at 3.6 against the 4.5 threshold, with momentum notes describing a confirmed downtrend below the 200-day moving average and a hard-blocking death-cross technical signal. Engine gate (failed) | Momentum should recover above the 4.5 gate threshold and price should reclaim its 200-day moving average as the downtrend reverses over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe drawdown of 80% from the 52-week high, cited in the suitability rationale, means much of the potential downside from this downtrend may already have played out. | ||
Risk notes describe short interest of 15% as justified, alongside high implied volatility of 93%, both consistent with the bearish technical picture. Risk breakdown | Short interest should decline meaningfully from 15% and implied volatility should compress toward a more typical range over the next 12 months if bearish positioning is unwinding. | →Stable |
| CounterThe put/call ratio of 0.571 is skewed toward calls rather than puts, suggesting options positioning does not reflect heavy bearish hedging despite the justified short interest. | ||
CounterThe current ratio of 9.4 shows very substantial near-term liquidity, giving ample runway to absorb continued cash burn.
CounterLight analyst coverage is explicitly flagged as dampening the signal, and the position-size recommendation is still avoid given the institutional-constrained edge type for this $0.6B market cap.
CounterThe drawdown of 80% from the 52-week high, cited in the suitability rationale, means much of the potential downside from this downtrend may already have played out.
CounterThe put/call ratio of 0.571 is skewed toward calls rather than puts, suggesting options positioning does not reflect heavy bearish hedging despite the justified short interest.
Tilray Brands shows an extreme risk/reward skew with 117% analyst upside and a passed asymmetry gate, but quality below the engine's floor, a confirmed downtrend with a death-cross block, and high short interest keep the engine's recommendation at exit.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 1.5 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.4 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 3.2 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.6 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 6.1 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 3.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.8 |
| Price target | 10.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.6 |
| quality rank | 0.1 |
| growth rank | 1.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 8.0 |
| support resistance | 8.7 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 2.0 |
| days to cover | 5.3 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 3.7 |
| debt equity | 7.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -81% (>40% off 52w high)
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.3 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.3, Sentiment at 7.4, and Insider at 7.2; the weakest are Quality at 2.3, Catalyst at 2.5, and Peer rank at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 8.47 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio falls below 1.5 from the current 8.52.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 3.5 from the current 2.3.
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 4.5 from the current 3.6.
Trip ifShort interest falls below 8% of float from the current 15%.