Skip to main content
THRM · Why this verdict

Why Gentherm (THRM) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.5/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Gentherm is an auto-parts supplier at a 9.3x forward P/E with 847% FCF/NI and 46% upside to the analyst target, but it has no moat, is 97% automotive, missed EPS by 48% in October and trades in a downtrend.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Cash conversion is excellent at 847% FCF/NI and the Piotroski F-Score is 8/9, although the business has no competitive moat.

↓Deteriorating
Quality breakdown
Expectation
FCF/NI should stay above 100% and the Piotroski F-Score at 7 or higher.

CounterA very high FCF/NI ratio can come from depressed net income, and the lack of a moat limits pricing power.

The stock trades at a 9.3x forward P/E with a PEG of 0.06, and analysts see 68% upside, with a $41.76 target (46.0% above the $28.60 price).

↓Deteriorating
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Price should move toward the $41.76 target as earnings recover over 12 months.

CounterAnalyst coverage is light, which dampens the signal, and the October miss may force target cuts.

EPS has swung between 2 beats and 2 misses in the last four quarters, with the latest at 0.33 vs 0.64 estimated, a 48.2% miss.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
EPS should meet or beat consensus in the next report, due 2027-02-18, and return above 0.50 per share.

CounterTwo quarters of large beats (0.84 and 0.75) show that the October result may be a one-off.

The automotive segment is 97.0% of revenue and 66.0% of sales come from outside the United States, two high-severity concentration risks.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
Automotive share should stay at or below 97% and revenue should grow toward the $471M next-quarter estimate.

CounterDeep automotive specialization can create expertise and customer lock-in, while the international mix diversifies away from U.S. demand alone.

Momentum is weak at 3.3/10 with price below its 200-day average, which slopes down 1.4% over 30 days, a put/call ratio of 1.44 and 101% implied volatility.

↑Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price should reclaim the 200-day average and momentum should rise above 4.5 within two quarters.

CounterConfirmed downtrends tend to persist, and insiders sold $243,056 in the last 90 days.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E0.0
P/S9.6
EV/EBITDA5.4
Fwd P/E9.2
PEG10.0
Analyst target9.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 10.7x
  • ▸PEG: 0.06
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

4.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.4
ROA3.2
Gross margin0.7
Op margin2.5
Net margin0.3
Current ratio7.2
FCF quality10.0
Moat4.5
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸Excellent cash conversion: 1000% FCF/NI
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

3.7/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.7

Momentum

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position6.0
Volume4.0
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat

Sentiment

7.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.9
Analyst rating6.7
Price target9.4
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (7.0) — signal dampened
  • ▸Analyst upside: 45%

Insider

6.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality6.5
insider conviction6.0
holder change6.5
  • ▸Modest insider buying — $622,631 (0.034% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.0
quality rank2.1
growth rank4.8

Technical

1.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.3
support resistance0.7
52w position4.6

Risk (lower is worse)

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.3
days to cover9.6
volatility0.0
put call10.0
implied vol3.0
max pain risk7.0
beta5.5
debt equity7.9
news risk6.0
  • ▸High IV: 62%
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg7.4
news activity8.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:7.0>=5.5
  • ASYMMETRY:1.7>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:111d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)

none

Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
1.73
Upside
+25.9%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.8B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.37>1.3, MCap $1.8B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.6) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.73 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.6, Sentiment at 7.3, and Momentum at 7.0; the weakest are Technical at 1.9, Growth at 3.7, and Peer rank at 3.9. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.73 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Cheap Valuation Analyst Upside

    Trip ifAnalyst target falls below $33 from the current $41.76.

  • P2Excellent Cash Conversion

    Trip ifFCF/NI falls below 100% from the current 847%, or Piotroski F-Score drops below 6 from 8.

  • P3Inconsistent Earnings

    Trip ifEPS misses estimates by more than 20% in the 2027-02-18 report.

  • P4Auto Concentration International

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $380M from the recent $416M.

  • P5Downtrend Negative Momentum

    Trip ifPrice falls below the $26.60 stop-loss, with momentum score under 3.0 from the current 3.3.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › THRM › Why this verdict