Value
9.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Tamboran Resources is a pre-revenue Beetaloo gas developer with 93% analyst upside, but it burns cash, has a quality score of 2.0/10, missed EPS in 3 of 4 quarters and is 42% off its high with weak momentum.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Analysts see 93% upside, with a $50.96 target against a $30.30 price. Sentiment breakdown | Price should move toward the $50.96 target as development milestones are delivered over 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst coverage is light, so the signal is dampened, and the target depends on a development program that has not yet generated revenue. | ||
The company is cash-burning with negative free cash flow, reported revenue of $0 in each of the last four quarters, and a quality score of 2.0 versus a 4.0 floor. Quality breakdown | Quarterly revenue should start to appear near the $1.4M estimate and quality should rise toward 4.0. | →Stable |
| CounterA pre-production developer is expected to burn cash, so weak quality scores may simply reflect the stage of the business. | ||
EPS missed estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, including -0.60 vs -0.28 estimated, with an average surprise of -31.6%. Earnings | Losses per share should come in at or below estimates in the 2026-11-12 report. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe February 2026 quarter beat (-0.27 vs -0.36), so losses may be narrowing as spending normalizes. | ||
All value is tied to one location, with a high-severity geographic concentration risk in the Beetaloo basin. Bear case | Development results from the basin should confirm commercial flow rates and move the project toward first revenue. | →Stable |
| CounterAppraisal results can disappoint, and a single-basin exposure leaves no diversification if regulation, cost or logistics turn adverse. | ||
Momentum is weak at 3.2/10 with falling on-balance volume, although the 200-day average is still rising 4.2% over 30 days, which points to a pullback within an uptrend. Momentum breakdown | Momentum score should recover above 4.5 and price should hold above the rising 200-day average. | ↑Improving |
| CounterPrice is 42% off its 52-week high with distribution volume, which may signal a longer decline rather than a pullback. | ||
CounterAnalyst coverage is light, so the signal is dampened, and the target depends on a development program that has not yet generated revenue.
CounterA pre-production developer is expected to burn cash, so weak quality scores may simply reflect the stage of the business.
CounterThe February 2026 quarter beat (-0.27 vs -0.36), so losses may be narrowing as spending normalizes.
CounterAppraisal results can disappoint, and a single-basin exposure leaves no diversification if regulation, cost or logistics turn adverse.
CounterPrice is 42% off its 52-week high with distribution volume, which may signal a longer decline rather than a pullback.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.8 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.8 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 8.2 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.7 |
| Price target | 9.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.0 |
| quality rank | 1.9 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.8 |
| support resistance | 5.2 |
| 52w position | 2.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.2 |
| days to cover | 8.1 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 9.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 42 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.1B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.1B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects clean gate clearance against Value at 9.0 and asymmetric R:R of 4.39.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.0, Sentiment at 7.7, and Risk (lower is worse) at 7.4; the weakest are Quality at 2.0, Catalyst at 2.5, and Technical at 4.4. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 4.39 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifAnalyst target falls below $40 from the current $50.96.
Trip ifQuarterly revenue stays below $1M through the next 2 quarters, from the current $0.
Trip ifQuarterly loss per share exceeds the estimate in 2 consecutive quarters, from the current average surprise of -31.6%.
Trip ifBasin appraisal flow rates come in at less than 50% of project targets, or the development timeline slips more than 12 months.
Trip ifPrice falls below the $28.18 stop-loss, with momentum score under 3.0 from the current 3.2.