Value
7.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.1 |
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 11.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.38
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Suncor Energy has a wide economic moat, a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9, and a forward P/E of 11.2x with a PEG of 0.38, offering an attractively priced integrated energy position, though momentum is weak and the stock has already exceeded analyst price targets.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Suncor is assessed as having a wide economic moat with a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 and a strong returns-plus-growth profile, indicating durable competitive advantages in integrated oil sands production that sustain profitability across commodity cycles. Quality breakdown | Operating margins remain above 15% and free cash flow remains positive over the next 12 months, reflecting the moat's ability to generate cash even in a softer energy pricing environment. | →Stable |
| CounterOil sands production has very high break-even costs and limited flexibility to curtail production; the moat may be illusory if oil prices fall substantially below the cost of production. | ||
The data flags a yield trap warning, indicating the dividend yield may look attractive but is not supported at the current distribution level relative to sustainable cash flows, which is a concern given that earnings in 1 of the last 4 quarters came in below estimates. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend coverage ratio improves to above 1.5x earnings over the next 12 months, demonstrating the payout is sustainable from operating cash flow. | →Stable |
| CounterAs an integrated producer with wide moat characteristics, Suncor has historically maintained dividends through commodity downturns by using balance sheet flexibility; the yield trap flag may be overly conservative. | ||
A forward P/E of 11.2x and a PEG ratio of 0.38 indicate the market is pricing Suncor at a meaningful discount to earnings growth, with a value score of 8.1 out of 10 and the analyst consensus describing the stock as attractively valued. Valuation breakdown | The forward P/E expands above 13x within 12 months as the market recognizes the discount to the energy sector's growth profile. | →Stable |
| CounterEnergy companies have historically traded at discounted multiples to the broader market because commodity exposure creates earnings volatility; the low PEG may persist rather than compress. | ||
The momentum score is 4.0 out of 10, falling on-balance volume indicates distribution, and the stock already trades 9.3% above analyst targets, meaning even if the fundamental case is intact, the technical setup and price positioning do not favor near-term entry. Momentum breakdown | The stock price retreats to between $55 and $57, at least 4% below the current $59.65, before recovering, establishing a better technical entry point. | →Stable |
| CounterThe stock is above the 200-day moving average, which is an uptrend signal; the RSI of 34 suggests the stock is in an oversold pullback within a longer-term uptrend rather than a distribution phase. | ||
CounterOil sands production has very high break-even costs and limited flexibility to curtail production; the moat may be illusory if oil prices fall substantially below the cost of production.
CounterAs an integrated producer with wide moat characteristics, Suncor has historically maintained dividends through commodity downturns by using balance sheet flexibility; the yield trap flag may be overly conservative.
CounterEnergy companies have historically traded at discounted multiples to the broader market because commodity exposure creates earnings volatility; the low PEG may persist rather than compress.
CounterThe stock is above the 200-day moving average, which is an uptrend signal; the RSI of 34 suggests the stock is in an oversold pullback within a longer-term uptrend rather than a distribution phase.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.1 |
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 6.4 |
| ROA | 5.7 |
| Gross margin | 8.1 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 7.9 |
| Current ratio | 6.0 |
| FCF quality | 7.2 |
| Moat | 7.6 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 7.4 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 4.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.3 |
| Analyst rating | 6.1 |
| Price target | 4.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.7 |
| quality rank | 6.2 |
| growth rank | 7.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.2 |
| support resistance | 2.1 |
| 52w position | 9.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 6.5 |
| volatility | 5.3 |
| put call | 8.7 |
| implied vol | 5.6 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 9.5 |
| debt equity | 8.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 7.6 |
| dividend safety | 6.8 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Growth is cheap relative to earnings, but the technical setup has not yet produced a breakout above resistance (PEG 0.38, quality 7.7/10, growth 10.0/10).
L4:PATH_C2_GARP_WAIT|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDnone
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 70, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityConservative — Beta 0.59<0.8, Div 2.2%, Q=7.7
The C-path quality+growth combination triggered the STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict: quality 7.7 and growth 10.0 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of -1.33 supporting the read.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Value at 7.9, and Quality at 7.7; the weakest are Technical at 4.9, Insider at 5.0, and Sentiment at 5.4. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.33 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifOperating margin falls below 10%, declining more than 5 percentage points from the current level as oil prices drop significantly.
Trip ifForward P/E falls below 8x as earnings estimates decline by more than 25% from current consensus levels.
Trip ifPrice drops below $52, more than 12% below the current $59.65, confirming a breakdown through key technical support.
Trip ifDividend is cut by more than 25%, reducing the quarterly payment below 75% of its current level.