Value
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Fwd P/E | 1.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 61.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.20
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Space Exploration Technologies currently lacks a valid trade setup due to a price data gap, and the available fundamentals show a richly valued, revenue-declining business with margin compression despite an otherwise strong Piotroski quality score.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The engine flags 3 of 5 value-trap signals present, including revenue declining 33.7% YoY and operating margin compression to -149.5%. Bear case | Revenue growth should turn positive and operating margin should improve toward breakeven within 12 months if the value-trap signals are resolving. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterA single quarter of steep revenue decline combined with heavy margin compression could instead be an early indicator of a structurally deteriorating business. | ||
The engine flags a data issue where no current price is available from Alpaca or yfinance, which prevents entry, target, and stop calculation this run. Warnings | Price data should be restored and a valid trade setup should compute in the next data run. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterA persistent data gap could reflect a genuine data-feed issue with the ticker rather than a one-off outage. | ||
The stock carries an expensive valuation with a PEG ratio of 6.39, even as the Piotroski F-Score registers a strong 8/9. Valuation breakdown | The PEG ratio should compress as either earnings growth accelerates or the price corrects. | →Stable |
| CounterA strong Piotroski score suggests underlying fundamental strength that could justify a premium valuation multiple over time. | ||
Put/call ratio is elevated at 1.61 alongside 79% implied volatility, signaling defensive positioning in the options market. Risk breakdown | Put/call ratio should normalize if hedging pressure eases. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterElevated implied volatility may simply reflect the general uncertainty created by the current price data gap rather than a genuinely bearish view. | ||
Analyst coverage is light, which the engine notes dampens the reliability of the sentiment signal. Sentiment breakdown | Analyst coverage should expand, providing a more robust sentiment read within the next 2 quarters. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterLight coverage for a name with limited public float or unusual data availability may persist regardless of company performance. | ||
CounterA single quarter of steep revenue decline combined with heavy margin compression could instead be an early indicator of a structurally deteriorating business.
CounterA persistent data gap could reflect a genuine data-feed issue with the ticker rather than a one-off outage.
CounterA strong Piotroski score suggests underlying fundamental strength that could justify a premium valuation multiple over time.
CounterElevated implied volatility may simply reflect the general uncertainty created by the current price data gap rather than a genuinely bearish view.
CounterLight coverage for a name with limited public float or unusual data availability may persist regardless of company performance.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Fwd P/E | 1.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 7.4 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.9 |
| Moat | 8.0 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 6.2 |
| MA position | 2.5 |
| Volume | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.8 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 9.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.0 |
| quality rank | 1.7 |
| growth rank | 9.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.7 |
| support resistance | 8.7 |
| 52w position | 2.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.8 |
| days to cover | 9.1 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 3.2 |
| implied vol | 3.7 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| debt equity | 9.1 |
| news risk | 1.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Growth is cheap relative to earnings, but the technical setup has not yet produced a breakout above resistance (PEG 0.20, quality 7.5/10, growth 10.0/10).
L4:PATH_C2_GARP_WAIT|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeTemporary headwind — High quality (7.5) with weak momentum (3.0)
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The C-path quality+growth combination triggered the STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict: quality 7.5 and growth 10.0 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of 5.84 supporting the read.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Catalyst at 7.6, and Quality at 7.5; the weakest are Momentum at 3.0, Peer rank at 4.5, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 5.84 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifThe engine's asymmetry ratio rises above 1.0 once a valid current price becomes available in the next data run.
Trip ifRevenue growth exceeds 0% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifPEG ratio falls below 2.0 as earnings growth accelerates or price declines.
Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 1.0, reversing the current elevated hedging posture.
Trip ifAnalyst coverage rises above 10 covering analysts.