Skip to main content
PLNTPlanet Fitness, Inc.Sell5.7·$52.63
PLNT · Why this verdict

Why Planet Fitness (PLNT) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Planet Fitness is a high-quality fitness chain with a perfect 9-out-of-9 Piotroski F-Score and a perfect 4-for-4 earnings beat streak trading at a PEG of 0.86, but is currently in a confirmed technical downtrend with its 200-day moving average declining at 8.8% per month and falling analyst estimates.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Planet Fitness ranks best-in-class among leisure peers with a quality score of 7.7/10, a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, operating margins of 18%, and ranks in the top decile for both quality and growth within its peer group, reflecting the durability of its low-cost fitness membership model.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Operating margin remains above 15% and the Piotroski F-Score stays at 8 or above for the next 4 quarters.

CounterHigh margins in the low-cost gym segment can be competed away quickly if rivals undercut Planet Fitness's $10/month price point, and franchise-model revenue recognition can mask underlying unit economics weakness.

Planet Fitness has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 10.5%, with actual EPS ranging from $0.73 to $0.86, demonstrating consistent ability to manage costs and grow membership above analyst expectations.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
The company beats earnings estimates in the next 2 consecutive quarterly reports due in approximately 50 days.

CounterForward earnings estimates are trending down by 6.3% in the last 30 days, which is a leading indicator that analysts expect upcoming results to disappoint despite the historical beat streak.

At a forward P/E of 13.9x and PEG of 0.86, Planet Fitness is attractively priced relative to earnings growth within the leisure sector, with a value score of 7.5/10 and analyst consensus pointing to 33% upside to a price target of approximately $60.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The stock reaches the analyst target range near $60 within 12 months as technical headwinds resolve and the growth rate is sustained.

CounterA PEG of 0.86 is only attractive if the earnings growth rate holds — falling estimates of -6.3% over 30 days suggest the 'G' in the PEG denominator is about to shrink, making the current multiple less attractive than it appears.

The stock is in a confirmed downtrend with the 200-day moving average declining at 8.8% per month — the steepest moving average slope decline across this analysis batch — and high short interest of 11% adds additional selling pressure that must be resolved before the fundamental case can be expressed.

→Stable
Warnings
Expectation
The stock reclaims its 200-day moving average and holds above it for 20 consecutive trading days, confirming the downtrend has ended.

CounterSteep 200-day moving average declines sometimes represent capitulation — the worst-case scenario for bearish price action — and high short interest can fuel sharp recovery moves when fundamentals surprise positively.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E7.1
P/S8.2
EV/EBITDA5.1
Fwd P/E8.2
PEG7.5
Analyst target6.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 14.4x
  • ▸PEG: 0.92
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

7.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROA5.7
Gross margin7.7
Op margin10.0
Net margin9.1
Current ratio5.8
FCF quality5.0
Moat5.9
Piotroski F10.0
  • ▸Strong margins: 18%
  • ▸Earnings quality warning: 66% FCF/NI
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

5.4/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.6
EPS growth7.2

Momentum

4.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI2.4
MACD10.0
OBV1.0
MA position6.0
Volume1.1
  • ▸Overbought bear rally (RSI 78)
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -12.9%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

7.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment7.2
Analyst rating7.3
Price target8.1
  • ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.44 (n=2)
  • ▸Analyst upside: 25%

Insider

3.8/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.5
holder change2.8
notable moves3.0
  • ▸Insider buying (low materiality) — $253,519 (0.006% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

5.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.9
quality rank8.5
growth rank3.6
  • ▸Best-in-class margins

Technical

1.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger2.5
support resistance1.3
52w position0.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest2.7
days to cover7.8
volatility3.0
put call7.9
implied vol1.3
max pain risk7.0
beta6.8
  • ▸High IV: 72%

Catalyst

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg6.8
news activity6.0
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • ▸Earnings in 6 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (4)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_BOOST:ANALYST:0.50
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (4)
  • MOMENTUM:4.1<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:0.8<1.5@spot
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:6d<=7d
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
0.81
Upside
+12.1%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 78

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -54% (>40% off 52w high)

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.4 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Sentiment at 7.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.1<4.5, ASYMMETRY:0.8<1.5@spot, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.81 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 7.5, Quality at 7.4, and Value at 7.1; the weakest are Technical at 1.3, Insider at 3.8, and Momentum at 4.1. The V9 engine flagged 4 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.81 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Quality And Margins Leadership

    Trip ifOperating margin falls below 12% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Perfect Earnings Execution

    Trip ifEarnings miss consensus estimates by more than 5% in 2 of the next 3 quarterly reports.

  • P3Valuation Growth Discount

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus earnings estimates decline by more than 15% from current levels over the next 6 months.

  • P4Technical Downtrend Headwind

    Trip ifStock price drops below $42, exceeding a 16% decline from current levels, confirming accelerating technical deterioration.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › PLNT › Why this verdict
Why TrendMatrix rates PLNT the way it does — verdict reasoning