Value
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.6 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 21.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.10
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Orion Group shows an earnings-quality red flag, with free cash flow at -55% of net income despite a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9. Quality breakdown | FCF-to-net-income conversion turns positive, exceeding 0%. | →Stable |
| CounterA single-period negative FCF-to-net-income ratio in construction can reflect timing of working-capital build for large projects rather than a genuine earnings-quality problem. | ||
The momentum gate failed at 4.0, just short of the 4.5 threshold, with on-balance volume showing distribution even as price holds above the 200-day average. Engine gate (failed) | The momentum score rises above 4.5 as selling pressure eases. | →Stable |
| CounterA momentum score this close to the threshold could clear the bar with only a small improvement in price action. | ||
The stock has already reached its analyst price target, with only 1.5% implied upside remaining, and the asymmetry ratio is just 0.12 given 12.9% downside risk. Bear case | The upside-to-target gap widens to more than 10% as either the price target is raised or the stock pulls back. | →Stable |
| CounterContinued strong growth and earnings could prompt analysts to raise the price target further, closing the upside gap without requiring a price decline. | ||
Notable insider selling of $606,512 (0.101% of market cap) adds a bearish signal on top of the quality concerns. Insider breakdown | Insider selling activity declines to below $300,000 in the next 90-day window. | →Stable |
| CounterModest insider sales of this size are common and don't necessarily reflect a negative view on the company's prospects. | ||
Revenue growth scores 6.2 and earnings growth scores a perfect 10.0 on the engine's 0-10 scale, suggesting the underlying business is still expanding despite the quality concerns. Components | The growth score stays above 6.0 as revenue and earnings expansion continue. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong reported earnings growth combined with a negative FCF-to-net-income ratio could indicate the earnings growth is not being converted into real cash, undermining its quality. | ||
CounterA single-period negative FCF-to-net-income ratio in construction can reflect timing of working-capital build for large projects rather than a genuine earnings-quality problem.
CounterA momentum score this close to the threshold could clear the bar with only a small improvement in price action.
CounterContinued strong growth and earnings could prompt analysts to raise the price target further, closing the upside gap without requiring a price decline.
CounterModest insider sales of this size are common and don't necessarily reflect a negative view on the company's prospects.
CounterStrong reported earnings growth combined with a negative FCF-to-net-income ratio could indicate the earnings growth is not being converted into real cash, undermining its quality.
Orion Group shows strong reported growth numbers, but an earnings-quality red flag from negative free cash flow relative to net income, a borderline momentum gate failure, and notable insider selling raise caution around the recently-reached price target.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.6 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.8 |
| ROA | 1.2 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.1 |
| Net margin | 0.5 |
| Current ratio | 5.2 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.6 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.2 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 7.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 8.5 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.6 |
| quality rank | 0.8 |
| growth rank | 4.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.5 |
| support resistance | 7.7 |
| 52w position | 6.3 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.6 |
| days to cover | 6.1 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 5.6 |
| debt equity | 6.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.34>1.3, MCap $0.6B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 8.1 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.5<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.1, Sentiment at 7.0, and Catalyst at 7.0; the weakest are Momentum at 2.5, Quality at 2.5, and Peer rank at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.45 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFCF-to-net-income ratio falls below -80% from the current -55%.
Trip ifThe momentum score falls below 2.5 out of 10 from the current 4.0.
Trip ifThe stock trades more than 10% above its analyst price target, worse than the current 1.5% upside.
Trip ifInsider selling exceeds $1,500,000 in a single 90-day window, more than double the current $606,512.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 0% YoY from the current positive pace.