Value
8.2/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.1 |
| P/S | 8.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.06
- ▸Attractively valued
OBDC · Why this verdict
Why Blue Owl Capital (OBDC) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Blue Owl Capital Corporation is a business development company trading at an attractively low forward P/E of 8.4x with strong free cash flow conversion, but a confirmed death-cross technical setup, declining revenue, and heavy concentration in first-lien debt create a risk profile that warrants caution at current levels.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
First-lien debt investments at 73.1% of the portfolio provide senior creditor protection in default scenarios, but this concentration also means the portfolio lacks the diversification across the capital structure that could smooth returns across credit cycles. Bear case | Portfolio first-lien concentration remains above 65% over the next 12 months, preserving the defensive seniority position in the credit stack. | ↑Improving |
| CounterFirst-lien concentration in a BDC can still result in meaningful losses if the middle-market borrowers default in a recession, as recovery values on leveraged loans can fall significantly below par. | ||
A forward P/E of 8.4x and PEG of 0.10 represent a deeply discounted valuation relative to earnings growth, with the company's net investment income supporting a substantial dividend yield while trading well below typical business development company multiples. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E expands above 11x over the next 12 months as the technical setup improves and the earnings miss pattern stabilizes. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterBusiness development companies with declining revenues and mixed earnings records deserve depressed multiples as a fair reflection of credit cycle risk, not as an opportunity; the low P/E may be a value trap. | ||
Free cash flow conversion of 130% of net income demonstrates that the business generates substantially more cash than accounting income suggests, which is characteristic of business development companies that record income on an accrual basis while receiving cash on a lag. Quality breakdown | FCF conversion remains above 100% of net income over the next 12 months, maintaining the income distribution capacity of the portfolio. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh FCF relative to net investment income in a BDC can reflect asset liquidations or portfolio shrinkage rather than operational strength, and should be confirmed against portfolio activity disclosures. | ||
Revenue has declined 15% year-over-year coinciding with a confirmed death-cross and falling on-balance volume, suggesting that both fundamental deterioration and institutional selling are reinforcing each other in a downward feedback loop. Momentum breakdown | Revenue stabilizes to better than minus 5% year-over-year by the next 2 quarters and price recovers above the 200-day moving average, breaking the technical downtrend. | ↑Improving |
| CounterRevenue declines in BDCs often reflect portfolio repositioning into higher-quality lower-yielding assets during credit-tightening cycles, which improves risk quality even as reported income dips temporarily. | ||
First-lien debt investments at 73.1% of the portfolio provide senior creditor protection in default scenarios, but this concentration also means the portfolio lacks the diversification across the capital structure that could smooth returns across credit cycles.
↑ImprovingBear case
- Expectation
- Portfolio first-lien concentration remains above 65% over the next 12 months, preserving the defensive seniority position in the credit stack.
CounterFirst-lien concentration in a BDC can still result in meaningful losses if the middle-market borrowers default in a recession, as recovery values on leveraged loans can fall significantly below par.
A forward P/E of 8.4x and PEG of 0.10 represent a deeply discounted valuation relative to earnings growth, with the company's net investment income supporting a substantial dividend yield while trading well below typical business development company multiples.
↓DeterioratingValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Forward P/E expands above 11x over the next 12 months as the technical setup improves and the earnings miss pattern stabilizes.
CounterBusiness development companies with declining revenues and mixed earnings records deserve depressed multiples as a fair reflection of credit cycle risk, not as an opportunity; the low P/E may be a value trap.
Free cash flow conversion of 130% of net income demonstrates that the business generates substantially more cash than accounting income suggests, which is characteristic of business development companies that record income on an accrual basis while receiving cash on a lag.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- FCF conversion remains above 100% of net income over the next 12 months, maintaining the income distribution capacity of the portfolio.
CounterHigh FCF relative to net investment income in a BDC can reflect asset liquidations or portfolio shrinkage rather than operational strength, and should be confirmed against portfolio activity disclosures.
Revenue has declined 15% year-over-year coinciding with a confirmed death-cross and falling on-balance volume, suggesting that both fundamental deterioration and institutional selling are reinforcing each other in a downward feedback loop.
↑ImprovingMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue stabilizes to better than minus 5% year-over-year by the next 2 quarters and price recovers above the 200-day moving average, breaking the technical downtrend.
CounterRevenue declines in BDCs often reflect portfolio repositioning into higher-quality lower-yielding assets during credit-tightening cycles, which improves risk quality even as reported income dips temporarily.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.3 |
| ROA | 3.3 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 8.5 |
| Current ratio | 0.7 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Strong margins: 17%
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 167% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Rule of 40: 11 (fail)
Growth
5.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -17%
Momentum
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 4.1 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -1.7%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.2 |
| Price target | 8.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.1 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 29%
Insider
6.2/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 6.6 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸Negligible insider buying — $45,210 (0.001% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
2.7/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.5 |
| quality rank | 2.4 |
| growth rank | 1.1 |
Technical
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.4 |
| support resistance | 5.3 |
| 52w position | 6.9 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.1 |
| days to cover | 5.6 |
| volatility | 7.3 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 5.9 |
| beta | 8.9 |
| debt equity | 4.8 |
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.7 |
| dividend safety | 4.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
- ▸Earnings in 6 days
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more. | News modifier -2 (HOLD_IF_HOLDING → SELL_IF_HOLDING).
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLD|L3:NEWS_MOD=-2Passed (6)
- ASYMMETRY:2.5>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
- MOMENTUM:4.0<4.5
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:6d<=7d
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
2.47
Upside
+12.4%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 49
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: ASYMMETRY:2.5>=1.5. Top dim: Value at 8.2; weakest: Peer rank at 2.7. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.2, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.2, and Sentiment at 7.0; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.7, Catalyst at 4.0, and Momentum at 4.0. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.47 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Attractive Valuation Low Pe
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 13x without a meaningful improvement in revenue growth above 5%.
- P2Strong Fcf Conversion
Trip ifFCF conversion falls below 80% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3First Lien Concentration Risk
Trip ifPortfolio first-lien concentration falls below 60% or non-accrual loans rise above 5% of portfolio fair value.
- P4Death Cross Revenue Decline
Trip ifRevenue declines by more than 20% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters or price drops below $10.