Value
9.1/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 9.6 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.56
- ▸Attractively valued
NX · Why this verdict
Why Quanex Building Products Corpor (NX) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quanex trades attractively at an 8.1x forward P/E and 0.59 PEG ratio, giving the stock the highest value score (9.0) among its scoring dimensions despite below-average quality. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E should stay below 12x while earnings hold up over the next 12 months to keep the value case intact. | →Stable |
| CounterA single-digit forward P/E in cyclical building products can be a value trap if earnings estimates prove too optimistic heading into a housing-market slowdown. | ||
The business scores below the quality floor (2.7/10) with no identified competitive moat, per the engine's quality assessment. Quality breakdown | Quality score should rise above 4.0 within 12 months if margin or moat indicators improve. | →Stable |
| CounterQuality scoring in cyclical commoditized building-products manufacturing structurally penalizes moat and margin metrics even for well-run operators, so a low score may understate execution quality. | ||
Quanex has beaten estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, averaging a 37.3% surprise, and analysts see 60% upside to their price target. Earnings | The beat streak should continue and analyst upside should narrow as the price converges toward targets over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA 60% analyst upside gap this wide can reflect stale price targets rather than genuine mispricing, especially for a small-cap name below institutional research coverage reach. | ||
The stock carries elevated bearish signals — 10% short interest and a 1.67 put/call ratio — alongside 87% implied volatility. Key risks | Short interest should decline below 8% and the put/call ratio should normalize toward 1.0 if bearish pressure eases. | →Stable |
| CounterShort interest and elevated implied volatility in a small-cap, low-float name can reflect thin options liquidity rather than a strong directional bearish view. | ||
The engine's asymmetry ratio of 3.35, from 35.6% modeled upside against 10.6% downside, cleared its 1.5 minimum threshold, indicating a favorable risk/reward setup. Reward-to-risk math | Asymmetry ratio should stay above 2.0 for the setup to remain attractive over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA favorable asymmetry ratio calculated off a below-quality-floor stock may simply reflect a value trap where the upside target never materializes as fundamentals continue to erode. | ||
Quanex trades attractively at an 8.1x forward P/E and 0.59 PEG ratio, giving the stock the highest value score (9.0) among its scoring dimensions despite below-average quality.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Forward P/E should stay below 12x while earnings hold up over the next 12 months to keep the value case intact.
CounterA single-digit forward P/E in cyclical building products can be a value trap if earnings estimates prove too optimistic heading into a housing-market slowdown.
The business scores below the quality floor (2.7/10) with no identified competitive moat, per the engine's quality assessment.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Quality score should rise above 4.0 within 12 months if margin or moat indicators improve.
CounterQuality scoring in cyclical commoditized building-products manufacturing structurally penalizes moat and margin metrics even for well-run operators, so a low score may understate execution quality.
Quanex has beaten estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, averaging a 37.3% surprise, and analysts see 60% upside to their price target.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The beat streak should continue and analyst upside should narrow as the price converges toward targets over the next 12 months.
CounterA 60% analyst upside gap this wide can reflect stale price targets rather than genuine mispricing, especially for a small-cap name below institutional research coverage reach.
The stock carries elevated bearish signals — 10% short interest and a 1.67 put/call ratio — alongside 87% implied volatility.
→StableKey risks
- Expectation
- Short interest should decline below 8% and the put/call ratio should normalize toward 1.0 if bearish pressure eases.
CounterShort interest and elevated implied volatility in a small-cap, low-float name can reflect thin options liquidity rather than a strong directional bearish view.
The engine's asymmetry ratio of 3.35, from 35.6% modeled upside against 10.6% downside, cleared its 1.5 minimum threshold, indicating a favorable risk/reward setup.
→StableReward-to-risk math
- Expectation
- Asymmetry ratio should stay above 2.0 for the setup to remain attractive over the next 12 months.
CounterA favorable asymmetry ratio calculated off a below-quality-floor stock may simply reflect a value trap where the upside target never materializes as fundamentals continue to erode.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Quanex Building Products trades attractively cheap with a favorable risk/reward setup and a solid earnings beat streak, but weak quality metrics and elevated bearish options positioning temper the value case.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 2.0 |
| Gross margin | 1.3 |
| Op margin | 1.6 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 7.8 |
| Moat | 3.1 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
1.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.0 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
Momentum
2.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 2.9 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 3.1 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -1.3%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 70%
Insider
7.5/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
4.1/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.6 |
| quality rank | 0.4 |
| growth rank | 3.5 |
Technical
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 8.5 |
| support resistance | 8.4 |
| 52w position | 4.1 |
| gap | 6.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.8 |
| days to cover | 2.6 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 7.5 |
| debt equity | 4.6 |
- ▸High IV: 105%
Catalyst
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- ASYMMETRY:4.0>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:58d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- MOMENTUM:2.5<4.5
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
3.98
Upside
+44.8%
Downside
11.2%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.8B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.8B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.1 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.5<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.1, Insider at 7.5, and Technical at 6.8; the weakest are Growth at 1.5, Momentum at 2.5, and Quality at 2.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.98 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Attractive Valuation Despite Quality
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 15x without a corresponding rise in the stock price, signaling deteriorating earnings estimates.
- P2Quality Floor Breach No Moat
Trip ifQuality score stays below 3.0 for 4 consecutive quarters.
- P3Earnings Beat Analyst Upside
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% at the 2026-09-03 report, or analyst upside narrows to below 20% without the price rising.
- P4Elevated Bearish Options Short Interest
Trip ifShort interest rises above 12% of float or put/call ratio exceeds 2.0 for 2 consecutive months.
- P5Favorable Asymmetry Risk Reward
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio compresses below 1.5 for 2 consecutive quarters.