Value
6.9/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.1 |
| P/S | 8.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.3 |
| PEG | 1.9 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 10.1x
- ▸PEG: 5.94
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The position is flagged as carrying a 37% margin of safety, suggesting a valuation cushion versus intrinsic value. Bull case | The margin of safety should be preserved or widen as the price stays below intrinsic value over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA stated margin of safety can be undermined if weak growth persists, since a slowly growing business may deserve a lower intrinsic value than the estimate assumes. | ||
The analyst price target has effectively been reached, leaving limited upside remaining at roughly 6% below the noted target level. Bear case | A higher analyst target should emerge to reopen upside room over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterLight analyst coverage means the current target may simply be stale, and a re-rating higher could occur quickly if coverage expands or improves. | ||
The company has missed earnings estimates in two of its last four reported quarters and is separately flagged for weak growth. Bear case | The company should return to a consistent beat pattern, with earnings surprise turning positive and the growth score improving, over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA 50/50 beat-miss split alongside strong margins and a near-perfect Piotroski F-Score suggests the underlying business remains fundamentally sound despite uneven quarterly results. | ||
The reward/risk setup has turned negative, with an asymmetry ratio of -0.5, meaning the downside to the stop-loss now outweighs the upside to the take-profit level. Warnings | The reward/risk ratio should turn positive again, with upside to the take-profit level exceeding the downside to the stop-loss, over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA negative reward/risk reading can persist in a range-bound bank stock without necessarily signaling a genuine deterioration in the underlying business. | ||
Implied volatility is elevated at 87%, reflecting the market's pricing of meaningful uncertainty in the shares. Risk breakdown | Implied volatility should compress well below 87% as uncertainty resolves over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterElevated implied volatility around earnings dates for a small regional bank can be temporary and doesn't necessarily reflect a persistent risk premium. | ||
CounterA stated margin of safety can be undermined if weak growth persists, since a slowly growing business may deserve a lower intrinsic value than the estimate assumes.
CounterLight analyst coverage means the current target may simply be stale, and a re-rating higher could occur quickly if coverage expands or improves.
CounterA 50/50 beat-miss split alongside strong margins and a near-perfect Piotroski F-Score suggests the underlying business remains fundamentally sound despite uneven quarterly results.
CounterA negative reward/risk reading can persist in a range-bound bank stock without necessarily signaling a genuine deterioration in the underlying business.
CounterElevated implied volatility around earnings dates for a small regional bank can be temporary and doesn't necessarily reflect a persistent risk premium.
A stated margin of safety and strong fundamentals are offset by a reached analyst target with limited upside, a mixed earnings record with weak growth, and a newly negative reward/risk reading, arguing for trimming the position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.1 |
| P/S | 8.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.3 |
| PEG | 1.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 7.0 |
| ROA | 1.3 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.9 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.0 |
| EPS growth | 2.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 3.3 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.9 |
| Price target | 6.9 |
| erm sentiment | 3.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.0 |
| quality rank | 7.4 |
| growth rank | 2.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.9 |
| support resistance | 4.9 |
| 52w position | 7.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.4 |
| days to cover | 4.3 |
| volatility | 3.5 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 7.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 3.5 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 3.8 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.6B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Insider at 7.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.0<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-0.4=NEGATIVE, FINSVC_REGIONAL_CLIFF:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.44 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.5, Value at 6.9, and Quality at 6.2; the weakest are Growth at 3.1, Momentum at 4.0, and Catalyst at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.44 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifThe margin of safety compresses below 10% from the current 37%.
Trip ifThe take-profit target rises above $30.00, exceeding the current $27.12 price by more than 10%.
Trip ifEarnings surprise turns positive for 2 consecutive quarters and the growth score rises above 5.0 from the current 3.1.
Trip ifThe reward-to-risk ratio rises above 1.0 from the current -0.5.
Trip ifImplied volatility compresses below 50% from the current 87%.