Skip to main content
NPOEnpro Inc.Buy Wait5.1·$284.44
NPO · Why this verdict

Why Enpro (NPO) is rated BUY WAIT

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score5.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Enpro has delivered strong cash generation with a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9 and free cash flow at 308% of net income, but its valuation has moved ahead of fundamentals with a negative asymmetry ratio and the stock trading above its analyst price target, limiting near-term upside.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Enpro converts earnings to free cash flow at an extraordinary rate of 308% relative to net income, with a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, indicating strong underlying financial health.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow conversion remains above 200% of net income and Piotroski score stays at 8 or above over the next 12 months.

CounterHigh free cash flow relative to net income can reflect working capital timing rather than durable operating quality; margin compression at 4.6 gross score signals limited pricing power.

Enpro has beaten analyst earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of approximately 1.3%, indicating consistent execution against expectations.

→Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Earnings beat rate remains at 3 out of 4 quarters or better over the next four reporting periods.

CounterThe average surprise of 1.3% is thin, suggesting estimates are already well-calibrated and large beats are unlikely; recent miss in August 2025 shows vulnerability.

The put/call ratio stands at 2.48 and implied volatility is 66%, indicating the options market is pricing in significant downside risk and hedging activity against this position.

↓Deteriorating
Options
Expectation
Put/call ratio declines below 1.5 over the next 12 months as bearish hedging pressure normalizes.

CounterElevated put/call ratios can be contrarian buy signals when driven by protective hedges on long positions rather than speculative bearish bets.

The stock is trading above its analyst price target with a negative asymmetry ratio of -1.4, meaning the downside risk of 15% exceeds any remaining upside, reducing reward-to-risk attractiveness.

↑Improving
Warnings
Expectation
Price retreats to a level where upside to analyst target rises above 10% or the analyst target is raised higher than the current price within 12 months.

CounterStocks can sustain above-target prices for extended periods if fundamental momentum continues to surprise; the golden cross and RSI at 70 indicate strong near-term price momentum.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E0.0
P/S7.0
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E4.8
PEG4.8
Analyst target7.5
  • ▸Forward P/E: 26.1x
  • ▸PEG: 1.74

Quality

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE1.0
ROA3.2
Gross margin4.6
Op margin6.8
Net margin1.8
Current ratio7.8
FCF quality10.0
Moat6.4
Piotroski F10.0
  • ▸Excellent cash conversion: 297% FCF/NI
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

4.6/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth6.9
EPS growth2.3

Momentum

3.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.5
MACD0.0
OBV10.0
MA position2.2
Volume1.3
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+4.2%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.1
Price target9.0
erm sentiment5.0
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (4.0) — signal dampened
  • ▸Analyst upside: 37%

Insider

6.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change6.8
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank1.2
quality rank1.6
growth rank7.0

Technical

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger6.5
support resistance6.9
52w position4.6
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.4
days to cover8.0
volatility1.6
put call0.0
implied vol3.8
beta4.7
debt equity8.5
  • ▸Elevated put/call: 84.67

Catalyst

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg4.5
dividend safety5.2
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • ▸Earnings in 3 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Earnings in 3 days. Wait until post-earnings.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L3:NEWS_BLOCK|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BAND
Passed (5)
  • ASYMMETRY:1.9>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:3d<=7d
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
1.86
Upside
+16.4%
Downside
8.8%
Sizing output
STARTER

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.58>1.3

Investment implication

A recent news event triggered an L3 news-block on the verdict path. Trigger: Earnings in 3 days. Wait until post-earnings. The 10-dimension scores remain Sentiment at 7.2 (strongest), but MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5 also fails — the news block is the proximate trigger, not the sole driver.

The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 7.2, Insider at 6.3, and Technical at 6.0; the weakest are Momentum at 3.4, Peer rank at 4.0, and Value at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.86 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Exceptional Cash Conversion

    Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 150% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Earnings Beat Consistency

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters.

  • P3Elevated Options Market Risk

    Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 3.5 or implied volatility exceeds 80%.

  • P4Negative Price Asymmetry

    Trip ifStock price rises above $380 without a corresponding analyst target increase above $380.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › NPO › Why this verdict