Skip to main content
NOCNorthrop Grumman CorporationSell5.3·$536.35-2.34%
NOC · Why this verdict

Why Northrop Grumman (NOC) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Northrop Grumman has delivered four consecutive earnings beats and a 29% return on equity with strong peer-relative valuation, but a confirmed death-cross technical pattern, high US government customer concentration of 84%, and below-average free cash flow quality present meaningful risks for new buyers.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Northrop has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with the most recent two beats exceeding 18%, indicating the company is consistently delivering above analyst expectations on program execution and cost management.

Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with positive surprises above 5%.

CounterDefense contractor earnings beats often reflect program timing and milestone billing rather than true operational acceleration, and the high PEG of 4.06 suggests limited growth to justify the beat pattern.

Approximately 84% of Northrop Grumman's revenue comes from the US government, making the company's financial performance highly dependent on federal defense budget decisions, continuing resolutions, and potential sequestration events.

Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
Non-US-government revenue grows to represent at least 20% of total revenue within 24 months through international defense contract wins.

CounterUS government concentration provides extraordinary revenue visibility and stability since defense contracts are multi-year, and the current geopolitical environment supports sustained or growing defense spending.

A confirmed death-cross is blocking a buy signal with a hard gate failure, and the stock's momentum score of 4.1 is below the minimum threshold of 4.5, with on-balance volume declining, indicating institutional distribution rather than accumulation.

Deteriorating
Engine gate (failed)
Expectation
The death cross resolves into a golden cross within 5 months as the price recovers above the 200-day moving average.

CounterMACD is improving and RSI at 46 is not yet oversold, suggesting the death cross may be in the early stages of resolution, particularly if defense spending news acts as a catalyst.

Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 29% is rated as excellent and places it among the top-performing peers in the aerospace and defense sector, reflecting efficient capital deployment on its defense programs.

Deteriorating
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Return on equity remains above 25% over the next 12 months as program profitability sustains current capital efficiency.

CounterHigh ROE in defense contractors is often supported by negative tangible book equity from pension obligations and buybacks rather than genuine business quality improvement.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E7.3
P/S9.1
EV/EBITDA4.2
Fwd P/E7.0
PEG3.2
Analyst target6.0
  • Forward P/E: 18.1x
  • PEG: 3.78

Quality

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE9.0
ROA4.8
Gross margin0.0
Op margin4.6
Net margin5.2
Current ratio4.5
FCF quality4.3
Moat5.4
Piotroski F4.4
  • Excellent ROE: 27%
  • Earnings quality warning: 55% FCF/NI
  • No competitive moat

Growth

2.3/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.8
EPS growth0.8

Momentum

6.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position6.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Below 200-MA, MA slope -1.4%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.5
Price target7.7
erm sentiment5.0
  • Analyst upside: 20%

Insider

7.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • Negligible insider selling — $54,310 (0.000% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

5.1/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank8.7
quality rank8.3
growth rank1.0
  • Attractive P/E vs peers
  • Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

4.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger4.6
support resistance3.4
52w position3.9

Risk (lower is worse)

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest9.2
days to cover8.6
volatility4.5
put call0.0
implied vol7.0
max pain risk5.0
debt equity5.3
  • Elevated put/call: 7.34
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg7.1
dividend safety8.0
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • Dividend aristocrat: 1.7% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:6.1>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:83d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:0.8<1.5@spot
Warning (1)
  • DEATH_CROSS:momentum=6.1>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
0.75
Upside
+8.0%
Downside
10.7%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRecovery Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 52

EdgeNo clear edge No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.3 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Insider at 7.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:0.8<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.75 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.3, Catalyst at 7.0, and Sentiment at 6.9; the weakest are Growth at 2.3, Technical at 4.0, and Quality at 4.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.75 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Government Customer Concentration

    Trip ifDefense budget appropriations fall below prior-year levels, causing management to lower full-year revenue guidance by more than 5%.

  • P2Consecutive Earnings Beat Streak

    Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.

  • P3Death Cross Momentum Blockage

    Trip ifPrice drops below $500 while still in a confirmed death-cross pattern.

  • P4Excellent Roe Peer Ranking

    Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 20% for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks NOC Why this verdict