four footwear contract manufacturers
“10-K Item 1: 'four footwear contract manufacturers each accounted for greater than 10% of footwear production and in the aggregate accounted for approximately 59% of NIKE Brand footwear production'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Nike discloses is four footwear contract manufacturers at 59%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Nike’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'four footwear contract manufacturers each accounted for greater than 10% of footwear production and in the aggregate accounted for approximately 59% of NIKE Brand footwear production'”
“10-K Item 1: 'non-U.S. NIKE Brand and Converse sales accounted for approximately 57% of total revenues, compared to 58% and 57% for fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, respectively'”
“10-K Item 1: 'the top five contract manufacturers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 51% of NIKE Brand apparel production'”
“10-K Item 1: 'During fiscal 2025, our three largest United States customers accounted for approximately 25% of sales in the United States.'”
Nike's concentration exposures span manufacturing and customers, with manufacturing the larger risk. Four footwear contract manufacturers each account for greater than 10% of footwear production and together represent approximately 59% of NIKE Brand footwear production, a high-share dependency. On apparel, the top five contract manufacturers in aggregate account for approximately 51% of NIKE Brand apparel production, another high-share dependency — both counterparty-specific risks where a disruption at one manufacturer could constrain supply. Geographically, non-U.S. sales account for approximately 57% of total revenues, compared with 58% and 57% in the two prior fiscal years — a high-share, structural exposure that has held roughly steady. On the customer side, the three largest United States customers accounted for approximately 25% of U.S. sales, a medium-share dependency, smaller in scope than the manufacturing concentrations. Netting these out, the manufacturing dependencies are the more consequential exposures if a single supplier falters, the geographic mix is a stable structural feature, and the U.S. customer concentration is the least pronounced of the four.
For the engine’s reasoning on NKE’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NKE● | Nike, Inc. | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| SHOO | Steven Madden, Ltd. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DECK | Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| CROX | Crocs, Inc. | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| WWW | Wolverine World Wide, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.