Value
8.2/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.0 |
| P/S | 8.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 16.0x
- ▸PEG: 0.40
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Natural Gas Services Group has beaten earnings estimates in all of its last 4 reported quarters, with an average surprise of 35.8%. Catalyst breakdown | The perfect beat streak should continue over the next 4 reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterA perfect 4-for-4 beat streak raises the bar for future quarters and increases the risk of a disappointing miss once estimates catch up. | ||
The company ranks best-in-class on margins versus peers and scores a strong 8 out of 9 on the Piotroski F-Score. Peer-rank breakdown | Margin ranking versus peers and the Piotroski score should remain strong over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterAn earnings-quality red flag shows free cash flow at -332% of net income, suggesting the strong margins may not be translating into cash generation. | ||
Despite strong reported margins, the quality assessment flags an earnings-quality red flag with free cash flow at -332% of net income. Quality breakdown | The FCF-to-net-income ratio should turn positive over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterNegative FCF-to-NI can reflect heavy growth capex in an oilfield-services upcycle rather than a genuine earnings-quality problem. | ||
Momentum has turned negative, failing the engine's 4.5 threshold at 2.8, though the pullback shows RSI at 37 within an uptrend, above the 200-day moving average. Momentum breakdown | Momentum score should recover above 4.5 over the next 12 months as the pullback resolves higher. | →Stable |
| CounterFalling on-balance volume (distribution) alongside the pullback could signal the beginning of a deeper correction rather than a buy-the-dip opportunity. | ||
The stock trades at a forward P/E of 16.8x with a PEG of 0.43, screening as attractively valued relative to its growth rate. Valuation breakdown | The PEG ratio should remain below 1.0 as growth continues to outpace the multiple over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA forward P/E of 16.8x is not obviously cheap in absolute terms for an oilfield-services name, and the PEG-based case depends on growth estimates holding up. | ||
CounterA perfect 4-for-4 beat streak raises the bar for future quarters and increases the risk of a disappointing miss once estimates catch up.
CounterAn earnings-quality red flag shows free cash flow at -332% of net income, suggesting the strong margins may not be translating into cash generation.
CounterNegative FCF-to-NI can reflect heavy growth capex in an oilfield-services upcycle rather than a genuine earnings-quality problem.
CounterFalling on-balance volume (distribution) alongside the pullback could signal the beginning of a deeper correction rather than a buy-the-dip opportunity.
CounterA forward P/E of 16.8x is not obviously cheap in absolute terms for an oilfield-services name, and the PEG-based case depends on growth estimates holding up.
Natural Gas Services Group combines a perfect earnings beat streak and best-in-class margins with an earnings-quality red flag on free cash flow and a momentum pullback, leaving the growth-at-a-reasonable-price case intact but unconfirmed technically.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.0 |
| P/S | 8.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.7 |
| ROA | 3.3 |
| Gross margin | 7.8 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 6.1 |
| Current ratio | 9.1 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.8 |
| EPS growth | 9.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 1.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 9.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.2 |
| quality rank | 6.6 |
| growth rank | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.5 |
| support resistance | 5.1 |
| 52w position | 8.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.8 |
| days to cover | 8.1 |
| volatility | 0.7 |
| put call | 8.7 |
| implied vol | 2.6 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 6.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
L4:PATH_F_HOLDnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 48 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: ASYMMETRY:1.9>=1.5. Top dim: Growth at 8.3; weakest: Momentum at 4.1. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.3, Value at 8.2, and Catalyst at 7.4; the weakest are Momentum at 4.1, Peer rank at 5.3, and Quality at 6.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.90 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEarnings beat rate falls below 75% over the next 4 reported quarters, breaking the current perfect streak.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 5 out of 9 from the current 8.
Trip ifFCF-to-net-income ratio rises above 0%, reversing the current -332% read.
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 4.5 from the current 2.8.
Trip ifPEG ratio rises above 1.5 from the current 0.43.