Skip to main content
MECMayville Engineering Company, ISell4.7·$32.52-1.71%
MEC · Why this verdict

Why Mayville Engineering Company, I (MEC) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL

Thesis pillars

Mayville Engineering trades at a forward P/E of 28.6x, but with a PEG ratio of just 0.12, the multiple looks cheap relative to its growth trajectory.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The PEG ratio should stay low as the stock re-rates or growth is sustained.

CounterQuality score sits well below the engine's 4.0 floor, suggesting the cheap growth-adjusted multiple may not be enough to offset broader quality concerns.

Insiders have sold a net $2.8 million over the past 90 days, equal to 0.331% of market cap, flagged as heavy severity per the engine's insider gate.

Stable
Insider breakdown
Expectation
Insider selling as a percentage of market cap should fall back toward more typical levels.

CounterNotable-but-not-extreme selling at a mid-cap industrial name can reflect routine compensation-related sales rather than a strong negative signal.

Momentum has weakened to a reading of 3.1, below the engine's 4.5 threshold, consistent with the negative price momentum flagged among the company's key risks.

Stable
Engine gate (failed)
Expectation
Momentum score should recover above the engine's 4.5 threshold.

CounterThe technical score itself remains relatively firm, suggesting the broader price structure hasn't broken down even as short-term momentum lags.

Mayville Engineering has beaten EPS estimates in 3 of its last 4 reported quarters, with an outsized average surprise driven by one very large beat.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The company should continue beating or meeting EPS estimates at the next print.

CounterThe extreme average surprise is disproportionately driven by a single quarter's outlier result on a tiny estimate base, making the historical average an unreliable guide to future performance.

TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Mayville Engineering screens cheap on a growth-adjusted basis with a recent earnings beat streak, but heavy insider selling, weak momentum, and quality metrics well below the engine's floor keep the exit signal in place.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.3/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/S9.3
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E4.1
PEG10.0
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 29.3x
  • PEG: 0.12

Quality

1.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.0
Gross margin0.0
Op margin0.0
Net margin0.0
Current ratio5.9
Moat3.6
Piotroski F5.6
  • No competitive moat
  • Quality concerns

Growth

7.1/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.2
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

2.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position6.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.3
Price target5.5
erm sentiment5.0
  • Light analyst coverage (5.0) — signal dampened

Insider

4.8/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality3.0
insider conviction2.0
holder change9.3
  • Notable insider selling — $2,830,441 (0.323% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

1.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank6.0
quality rank0.5
growth rank1.0

Technical

7.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger9.3
support resistance8.4
52w position6.8
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.5
days to cover9.6
volatility0.0
put call10.0
implied vol1.7
beta6.1
debt equity4.9
  • High IV: 70%
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

7.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
  • Strong earnings: 3B/0M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK
Passed (5)
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:28d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:2.5<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.8=NEGATIVE
  • INSIDER:0.32%=HEAVY
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.84
Upside
-10.1%
Downside
12.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeCatalyst-Driven Earnings in 28d with 3/4 beat streak

SuitabilityAggressive MCap $0.9B<$5B

Investment implication

The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Technical at 7.6 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.5<4.5.

The strongest dimensions are Technical at 7.6, Catalyst at 7.5, and Growth at 7.1; the weakest are Peer rank at 1.9, Quality at 1.9, and Momentum at 2.5. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.84 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Cheap Growth Adjusted Valuation

    Trip ifPEG ratio rises above 0.5 from the current 0.12.

  • P2Heavy Insider Selling

    Trip ifInsider selling as a percentage of market cap falls below 0.15% from the current 0.331%.

  • P3Momentum Weakness

    Trip ifMomentum score rises above 4.5, recovering from the current reading of 3.1.

  • P4Earnings Beat Pattern

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% (a miss) at the next earnings print.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks MEC Why this verdict