Skip to main content
MCFTMasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.Sell6.0·$20.14
MCFT · Why this verdict

Why MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

MasterCraft is a fast-growing boat maker (63% YoY growth) with a strong earnings-beat record and a low forward P/E of 9.6x, but with weak quality, cash burn and sole-source engine supplier dependence. The price is 10.4% below the analyst target against 6.4% downside to the stop.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Growth is exceptional at 63% YoY, with quarterly revenue of $129.9M in the June 2026 quarter, and the company is an industry growth leader.

→Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue should keep growing above 25% YoY over the next 12 months.

CounterBoats are discretionary, high-ticket purchases, and growth this fast in a cyclical category can reverse sharply when consumer credit tightens.

Quality is weak at 2.5 out of 10: free cash flow is -6% of revenue, there is no competitive moat, and margin scores are near zero.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow should turn positive for quality to improve over the next 12 months.

CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 shows underlying fundamentals are improving, and cash burn may reflect inventory building for growth.

The company relies on a sole-source engine supplier (Ilmor Engineering), which the data flags as a high-severity concentration risk.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
The supplier dependence should persist, so any disruption would hit production directly.

CounterA long-standing partnership with an engine specialist can be a competitive advantage and give priority supply.

Execution has been strong: 3 beats and no misses in the last reported quarters, with an average surprise of about 60%, and the last reported EPS of 0.45 beat the 0.35 estimate.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
EPS should meet or beat estimates at the November 4 report.

CounterThe most recent quarter shows no reported actual, and beats against low estimates are a lower bar than beating expectations that have risen.

Valuation is attractive on forward earnings: the forward P/E is 9.6x and the PEG ratio is 0.04, with the price 10.4% below the $21.75 analyst target.

↓Deteriorating
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The multiple should hold near current levels or expand as earnings growth is delivered, narrowing the gap to the target.

CounterA very low forward P/E can mean the market expects peak earnings in a cyclical business, and EV/EBITDA scores only 0.4.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.9/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/S9.4
EV/EBITDA0.1
Fwd P/E9.2
PEG10.0
Analyst target6.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 10.3x
  • ▸PEG: 0.04

Quality

2.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA1.0
Gross margin0.6
Op margin1.2
Net margin0.0
Current ratio5.7
FCF quality0.0
Moat4.8
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸Cash-burning: FCF -6% of revenue
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
  • ▸Quality concerns

Growth

10.0/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth10.0
  • ▸Strong growth: 63% YoY

Momentum

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD9.5
OBV10.0
MA position5.2
Volume4.1
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+0.3%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.0
Analyst rating5.0
Price target8.1
  • ▸Analyst upside: 24%

Insider

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality6.5
insider conviction8.0
holder change5.0
notable moves7.0
  • ▸Modest insider buying — $148,719 (0.030% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank0.0
quality rank2.0
growth rank9.0
  • ▸Industry growth leader

Technical

2.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger1.1
support resistance1.9
52w position4.2

Risk (lower is worse)

5.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.2
days to cover5.6
volatility4.5
put call10.0
implied vol1.3
max pain risk3.0
beta6.5
  • ▸High IV: 72%
  • ▸Above max pain $12
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
news activity5.0
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • ▸Earnings in 11 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (5)
  • MOMENTUM:6.7>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:1.2<1.5@spot
Warning (1)
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:11d<=14d (soft)
Reward-to-Risk
1.23
Upside
+8.0%
Downside
6.5%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 11d with 4/4 beat streak

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's 1.2<1.5@spot outcome against Growth at 10.0 and asymmetric R:R of 1.23.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Catalyst at 7.0, and Value at 6.9; the weakest are Technical at 2.4, Quality at 2.5, and Peer rank at 4.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.23 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Rapid Revenue Growth

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 20% YoY from the current 63%.

  • P2Consistent Earnings Beats

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3Cheap Forward Valuation

    Trip ifForward P/E exceeds 16x from the current 9.6x without matching earnings growth.

  • P4Weak Quality Cash Burn

    Trip ifFree cash flow margin rises above 5% of revenue from the current -6%.

  • P5Sole Source Engine Dependence

    Trip ifThe number of high-severity concentration risks drops to 0 from the current 2.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › MCFT › Why this verdict