Skip to main content
LPXLouisiana-Pacific CorporationSell4.8·$73.31
LPX · Why this verdict

Why Louisiana-Pacific (LPX) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Louisiana-Pacific is a building-products maker with declining revenue (-12%), a red-flag cash conversion and no competitive moat. The price is only 3.5% below the analyst target against 15.0% downside to the stop, so reward does not compensate for the risk.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Revenue is shrinking: the data shows a 12% decline, which leaves growth ranked at the bottom of its industry peers.

→Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue should return to flat or positive year-over-year growth for the thesis of decline to fail within 12 months.

CounterBuilding-product demand is cyclical, and a trough in housing activity could produce a sharp rebound in volumes and pricing.

Earnings quality is a red flag: free cash flow is -178% of net income, and the business has no competitive moat, putting overall quality at 3.1 out of 10.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow conversion should stay weak unless capital spending or working capital normalizes.

CounterA strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and conservative debt levels suggest the balance sheet can absorb the cash drag.

The price of $73.76 is only 3.5% below the $76.37 analyst target, against 15.0% downside to the stop, a reward-to-risk of 0.24.

→Stable
Upside pct
Expectation
Without higher analyst targets or an earnings rebound, upside to the target should remain in low single digits.

CounterAn earnings recovery from a depressed base could drive upward target revisions quickly.

Earnings results are inconsistent: 2 beats and 2 misses over the last four quarters, with the latest EPS of 0.40 missing the 0.57 estimate.

→Stable
Earnings
Expectation
EPS should reach or exceed estimates in the November 3 report for confidence to improve.

CounterThe average surprise was strongly positive (about 98%) because estimates were very low, which suggests expectations have already been reset.

The recent price rise looks like an overbought rally within a downtrend: RSI is 77 and the price is below a 200-day average sloping down 2.9% over 30 days.

Tripped↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
The price should pull back unless it reclaims the 200-day average on rising volume.

CounterRising on-balance volume and an improving MACD indicate real accumulation that could turn the recovery into a durable trend.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E0.2
P/S8.9
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E4.9
PEG10.0
Analyst target5.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 25.6x
  • ▸PEG: 0.09

Quality

3.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE1.0
ROA1.8
Gross margin0.0
Op margin2.1
Net margin1.1
Current ratio9.8
FCF quality0.0
Moat4.6
Piotroski F7.8
  • ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: -178% FCF/NI
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

5.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth0.0
EPS growth10.0
  • ▸Declining revenue: -12%

Momentum

4.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.0
MACD10.0
OBV1.0
MA position6.0
Volume3.9
  • ▸Overbought bear rally (RSI 71)
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -3.0%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.2
Price target7.6
erm sentiment5.5

Insider

6.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change6.8
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.4/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.8
quality rank2.0
growth rank0.0
  • ▸Conservative debt levels

Technical

3.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger2.2
support resistance1.5
52w position4.8
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest3.5
days to cover2.6
volatility4.2
put call9.0
implied vol3.7
beta4.6
debt equity9.1
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 MED (10-K Item 1A)

Catalyst

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
dividend safety4.3
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • ▸Earnings in 2 days
  • ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (5)
  • MOMENTUM:4.8>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:2d<=7d
Warning (2)
  • MOMENTUM:4.8<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
0.29
Upside
+3.9%
Downside
13.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 71

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.62>1.3

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's 0.3<1.5@spot outcome against Sentiment at 6.9 and asymmetric R:R of 0.29.

The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 6.9, Insider at 6.3, and Catalyst at 5.5; the weakest are Quality at 3.1, Peer rank at 3.4, and Technical at 3.6. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.29 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Declining Revenue

    Trip ifYear-over-year revenue growth rises above 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Poor Cash Conversion

    Trip ifFree cash flow to net income rises above 50% from the current -178%.

  • P3Thin Upside To Target

    Trip ifUpside to the analyst target rises above 15% from the current 3.5%.

  • P4Mixed Earnings Record

    Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P5Overbought Bear RallyTripped

    Trip ifPrice crosses above its 200-day average with RSI staying below 70.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › LPX › Why this verdict