Value
7.5/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.3 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.3 |
| PEG | 6.2 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 9.7x
- ▸PEG: 1.20
- ▸Attractively valued
HVT · Why this verdict
Why Haverty Furniture Companies, In (HVT) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company shows a strong earnings beat streak of three out of the last four quarters, and the setup is read as carrying a genuine earnings catalyst heading into the next report. Bull case | The beat streak should continue, or at minimum the company should avoid a miss, over the next 12 months for this pillar to hold. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recently reported quarter actually came in exactly in line rather than beating, showing the streak has already cooled from three straight beats to an in-line result. | ||
The company posts a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9 out of 9, indicating strong underlying financial health signals. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-Score should hold at or near this perfect level over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterBelow-average business quality is separately flagged as a key risk in the data, and the peer comparison ranks quality at the bottom of the group, suggesting the strong Piotroski read does not extend across every quality dimension. | ||
Valuation screens as attractive, with a forward P/E of 9.7x and a PEG ratio of 1.20, both of which the data characterizes as attractively valued. Valuation breakdown | The forward P/E and PEG ratio should hold at current levels or the market should re-rate the shares higher over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe peer comparison ranks this company at the very bottom of its group on quality, which could justify the market continuing to apply a discount multiple rather than re-rating higher. | ||
The technical setup is read as a breakout, with a golden cross in place, the shares trading above all major moving averages, and MACD reading bullish. Chart pattern detection | The breakout setup should hold with price remaining above key moving averages over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterOn-balance volume shows distribution rather than accumulation, and momentum itself sits exactly at the engine's minimum threshold, both of which weigh against the bullish chart pattern being fully confirmed. | ||
The risk/reward setup is unfavorable at current levels, with the asymmetry gate failing at the spot price and momentum sitting exactly at the engine's minimum threshold, alongside the shares having already reached their analyst-derived target. Engine gate (failed) | The asymmetry ratio should improve meaningfully above the engine's threshold and momentum should clear its floor over the next 12 months for these gate failures to reverse. | →Stable |
| CounterEvery other gate in the checklist, including insider activity, recent filings, and news events, comes back clean, and the setup still carries a genuine earnings-catalyst read, suggesting the failed gates may be a near-term valuation constraint rather than a broader deterioration. | ||
The company shows a strong earnings beat streak of three out of the last four quarters, and the setup is read as carrying a genuine earnings catalyst heading into the next report.
→StableBull case
- Expectation
- The beat streak should continue, or at minimum the company should avoid a miss, over the next 12 months for this pillar to hold.
CounterThe most recently reported quarter actually came in exactly in line rather than beating, showing the streak has already cooled from three straight beats to an in-line result.
The company posts a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9 out of 9, indicating strong underlying financial health signals.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- The Piotroski F-Score should hold at or near this perfect level over the next 12 months.
CounterBelow-average business quality is separately flagged as a key risk in the data, and the peer comparison ranks quality at the bottom of the group, suggesting the strong Piotroski read does not extend across every quality dimension.
Valuation screens as attractive, with a forward P/E of 9.7x and a PEG ratio of 1.20, both of which the data characterizes as attractively valued.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- The forward P/E and PEG ratio should hold at current levels or the market should re-rate the shares higher over the next 12 months.
CounterThe peer comparison ranks this company at the very bottom of its group on quality, which could justify the market continuing to apply a discount multiple rather than re-rating higher.
The technical setup is read as a breakout, with a golden cross in place, the shares trading above all major moving averages, and MACD reading bullish.
→StableChart pattern detection
- Expectation
- The breakout setup should hold with price remaining above key moving averages over the next 12 months.
CounterOn-balance volume shows distribution rather than accumulation, and momentum itself sits exactly at the engine's minimum threshold, both of which weigh against the bullish chart pattern being fully confirmed.
The risk/reward setup is unfavorable at current levels, with the asymmetry gate failing at the spot price and momentum sitting exactly at the engine's minimum threshold, alongside the shares having already reached their analyst-derived target.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- The asymmetry ratio should improve meaningfully above the engine's threshold and momentum should clear its floor over the next 12 months for these gate failures to reverse.
CounterEvery other gate in the checklist, including insider activity, recent filings, and news events, comes back clean, and the setup still carries a genuine earnings-catalyst read, suggesting the failed gates may be a near-term valuation constraint rather than a broader deterioration.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Haverty Furniture combines an attractive valuation, a perfect Piotroski F-Score, and a bullish technical breakout with a recent earnings beat streak, but momentum and asymmetry gates fail right at the engine's thresholds now that the shares have reached their analyst target.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.2 |
| ROA | 1.5 |
| Gross margin | 8.1 |
| Op margin | 1.0 |
| Net margin | 1.3 |
| Current ratio | 6.5 |
| FCF quality | 6.1 |
| Moat | 6.0 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9
Growth
4.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.5 |
| EPS growth | 4.6 |
Momentum
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 2.2 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.2 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.4 |
| Price target | 7.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (2.0) — signal dampened
Insider
7.5/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
3.5/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.0 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 2.0 |
Technical
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.9 |
| support resistance | 4.3 |
| 52w position | 8.3 |
| gap | 6.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 3.9 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 5.0 |
| beta | 6.4 |
| debt equity | 6.7 |
- ▸High IV: 87%
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 2 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.2 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
- ▸Dividend: 5.3%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Mixed signals. Hold existing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLD_DEFAULTPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:5.3>=4.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:22d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot
Warning (1)
- MOMENTUM:5.3<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
0.27
Upside
+2.0%
Downside
7.4%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 22d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B
Investment implication
The default F-path HOLD fired without any positive-conviction gate triggering — no momentum acceleration, no quality+value crossover, no setup recognition. Highest-clear gate: MOMENTUM:5.3>=4.5. Top dim: Value at 7.5; weakest: Peer rank at 3.5. The engine's read is one of pattern absence — no directional conviction in either direction at current asymmetry.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.5, Insider at 7.5, and Catalyst at 6.9; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.5, Growth at 4.0, and Quality at 4.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.27 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Recent Earnings Beat Streak
Trip ifMiss count rises above 0 in the trailing four-quarter window.
- P2Attractive Valuation Multiple
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 15x from the current 9.7x.
- P3Bullish Technical Breakout
Trip ifPrice falls below the 200-day moving average for more than 5 trading days.
- P4Failed Momentum Asymmetry Gates
Trip ifThe asymmetry ratio rises above 1.5 from the current 0.04.
- P5Perfect Piotroski Financial Health
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 out of 9 from the current 9.