Value
6.1/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.2 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 28.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.15
HTLD · Why this verdict
Why Heartland Express (HTLD) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality sits far below the engine's minimum floor, driven by cash-burning free cash flow and no competitive moat. Quality breakdown | The quality score should recover above the engine's minimum floor for the exit recommendation to be invalidated. | →Stable |
| CounterEven deeply sub-floor quality scores can recover quickly if a cost-cutting effort or a freight-rate recovery materially improves margins in this cyclical trucking business. | ||
Revenue is declining sharply, consistent with the broader freight and trucking cyclical downturn implied by the weak quality and momentum readings. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should stabilize or turn positive over the next few quarters for the deteriorating narrative to be challenged. | →Stable |
| CounterTrucking revenue is highly cyclical and tied to freight rates, so a rebound in shipping volumes could reverse the decline without company-specific improvement. | ||
HTLD failed the engine's momentum gate, with falling on-balance volume signaling distribution even as the stock sits in a pullback within a longer uptrend. Warnings | The momentum score should climb back above the engine's threshold within 12 months if the pullback proves to be a genuine buying opportunity rather than a trend reversal. | →Stable |
| CounterThe engine's own technical note frames the RSI pullback as a potential buy opportunity, suggesting the weak momentum reading could be a short-term dip rather than a structural breakdown. | ||
The asymmetry ratio is deeply negative, with the analyst target already exceeded relative to a much smaller downside estimate. Reward-to-risk math | The asymmetry ratio should turn positive again for the risk-reward profile to favor holding or adding to the position. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst targets can lag reality in a cyclical industry moving through a downturn, and the stock's elevated technical score suggests near-term price action doesn't yet reflect this bearish target gap. | ||
The engine flags a yield-trap warning on HTLD's dividend, even as a recent insider purchase sent a bullish signal. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend safety should improve, or the insider buying should be followed by additional purchases, for the yield-trap concern to ease. | →Stable |
| CounterA single small insider purchase is not a strong enough signal to offset a structurally cash-burning business with a potentially unsafe payout. | ||
Quality sits far below the engine's minimum floor, driven by cash-burning free cash flow and no competitive moat.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- The quality score should recover above the engine's minimum floor for the exit recommendation to be invalidated.
CounterEven deeply sub-floor quality scores can recover quickly if a cost-cutting effort or a freight-rate recovery materially improves margins in this cyclical trucking business.
Revenue is declining sharply, consistent with the broader freight and trucking cyclical downturn implied by the weak quality and momentum readings.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth should stabilize or turn positive over the next few quarters for the deteriorating narrative to be challenged.
CounterTrucking revenue is highly cyclical and tied to freight rates, so a rebound in shipping volumes could reverse the decline without company-specific improvement.
HTLD failed the engine's momentum gate, with falling on-balance volume signaling distribution even as the stock sits in a pullback within a longer uptrend.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- The momentum score should climb back above the engine's threshold within 12 months if the pullback proves to be a genuine buying opportunity rather than a trend reversal.
CounterThe engine's own technical note frames the RSI pullback as a potential buy opportunity, suggesting the weak momentum reading could be a short-term dip rather than a structural breakdown.
The asymmetry ratio is deeply negative, with the analyst target already exceeded relative to a much smaller downside estimate.
→StableReward-to-risk math
- Expectation
- The asymmetry ratio should turn positive again for the risk-reward profile to favor holding or adding to the position.
CounterAnalyst targets can lag reality in a cyclical industry moving through a downturn, and the stock's elevated technical score suggests near-term price action doesn't yet reflect this bearish target gap.
The engine flags a yield-trap warning on HTLD's dividend, even as a recent insider purchase sent a bullish signal.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- Dividend safety should improve, or the insider buying should be followed by additional purchases, for the yield-trap concern to ease.
CounterA single small insider purchase is not a strong enough signal to offset a structurally cash-burning business with a potentially unsafe payout.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
HTLD's quality sits far below the engine's investment floor amid a cash-burning, revenue-declining freight downturn, with weak momentum and a deeply negative risk-reward asymmetry arguing for exiting the position despite a small bullish insider purchase.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
1.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 1.6 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.8 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.0 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
- ▸Cash-burning: FCF -6% of revenue
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
5.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -20%
Momentum
3.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 1.8 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.5 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
4.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.5 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 3.0 |
- ▸Below analyst target
Insider
7.5/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
- ▸Negligible insider buying — $31,380 (0.003% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
2.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.2 |
| quality rank | 0.4 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
Technical
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.4 |
| support resistance | 7.2 |
| 52w position | 7.9 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.3 |
| days to cover | 7.1 |
| volatility | 4.8 |
| put call | 8.0 |
| implied vol | 1.4 |
| beta | 5.8 |
| debt equity | 9.2 |
- ▸High IV: 72%
Catalyst
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 5.6 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 1.9 |
| dividend safety | 4.5 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (4)
- INSIDER:OK
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:15d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:3.0<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-4.1=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-4.11
Upside
-25.2%
Downside
6.1%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 43 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.30>1.3, MCap $1.2B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Insider at 7.5 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.0<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.5, Technical at 7.2, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.2; the weakest are Quality at 1.6, Peer rank at 2.6, and Momentum at 3.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -4.11 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Quality Below Investment Floor
Trip ifFree cash flow margin rises above 0% of revenue for 2 consecutive quarters, lifting quality score above 4.0.
- P2Declining Revenue In Freight Downturn
Trip ifRevenue growth rises above 0% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Weak Momentum Failed Gate
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 4.5 for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming the pullback was a buying opportunity rather than a breakdown.
- P4Negative Risk Reward Asymmetry
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio rises above 0.0, reversing the current deeply negative risk-reward reading.
- P5Dividend Yield Trap With Bullish Insider Buying
Trip ifInsider net share purchases exceed 10,000 shares over a 90-day period, and dividend safety score rises above 7.0, resolving the yield-trap concern.