Value
7.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.3 |
| P/S | 6.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.4x
- ▸PEG: 0.15
- ▸Attractively valued
HTGC · Why this verdict
Why Hercules Capital (HTGC) is rated BUY WAIT
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score6.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Hercules Capital offers a forward P/E of 7.8x, a PEG of 0.70, and analysts implying roughly 25% upside — set against operating margins of 60% and a Rule of 40 score of 63 — but a confirmed technical downtrend with a declining 200-day moving average and negative volume accumulation argues for holding rather than adding until the technical picture improves.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At a forward P/E of 7.8x and a PEG ratio of 0.70, shares screen as attractively valued relative to the company's earnings growth, with analysts projecting approximately 25% upside to their consensus target from the current price. Valuation breakdown | The stock closes at least half the gap to the analyst consensus target over 12 months, with the forward P/E remaining below 12x. | →Stable |
| CounterA low forward multiple can persist when the market is pricing in an earnings deterioration that historical data does not yet reflect; if near-term earnings soften, the apparently cheap valuation may prove warranted rather than mistaken. | ||
Three beats in the last four quarters demonstrate that the company has generally delivered at or above Wall Street expectations, supporting confidence in near-term earnings visibility and management's guidance credibility. Earnings | EPS meets or exceeds consensus in each of the next three quarters, maintaining a beat rate of at least 75% on a trailing four-quarter basis. | →Stable |
| CounterThe one miss in the last four quarters — and an average positive surprise of only roughly 1.5% — signals that the beat margin is thin; a small shortfall against already modest estimates could disproportionately weigh on sentiment. | ||
The 200-day moving average has been declining at -1.7% per month and volume accumulation has turned negative (falling), indicating a confirmed technical downtrend that creates near-term price resistance and supports holding over adding at the current level. Momentum breakdown | If the technical picture improves, price should reclaim the 200-day moving average and the moving average slope should turn positive within three months, with volume accumulation resuming. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe fundamental case — attractive valuation, 25% analyst upside, and 60% operating margins — could draw buyers who look through near-term technical weakness, particularly if a positive catalyst resets market sentiment before the trend formally reverses. | ||
Operating margins of 60% and a Rule of 40 score of 63 — well above the 40 threshold — place this business in a top-tier position relative to its peers on profitability, signaling durable earnings power and above-average earnings quality. Quality breakdown | Operating margin holds above 50% and the Rule of 40 score remains above 40 over the next four quarters, confirming the margin advantage is structural. | →Stable |
| CounterThe moderate leverage at 1.1 times equity and the current negative momentum suggest the market may be pricing in a coming margin compression that the trailing figures do not yet show, limiting confidence that the current profitability level is stable. | ||
At a forward P/E of 7.8x and a PEG ratio of 0.70, shares screen as attractively valued relative to the company's earnings growth, with analysts projecting approximately 25% upside to their consensus target from the current price.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- The stock closes at least half the gap to the analyst consensus target over 12 months, with the forward P/E remaining below 12x.
CounterA low forward multiple can persist when the market is pricing in an earnings deterioration that historical data does not yet reflect; if near-term earnings soften, the apparently cheap valuation may prove warranted rather than mistaken.
Three beats in the last four quarters demonstrate that the company has generally delivered at or above Wall Street expectations, supporting confidence in near-term earnings visibility and management's guidance credibility.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- EPS meets or exceeds consensus in each of the next three quarters, maintaining a beat rate of at least 75% on a trailing four-quarter basis.
CounterThe one miss in the last four quarters — and an average positive surprise of only roughly 1.5% — signals that the beat margin is thin; a small shortfall against already modest estimates could disproportionately weigh on sentiment.
The 200-day moving average has been declining at -1.7% per month and volume accumulation has turned negative (falling), indicating a confirmed technical downtrend that creates near-term price resistance and supports holding over adding at the current level.
↑ImprovingMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- If the technical picture improves, price should reclaim the 200-day moving average and the moving average slope should turn positive within three months, with volume accumulation resuming.
CounterThe fundamental case — attractive valuation, 25% analyst upside, and 60% operating margins — could draw buyers who look through near-term technical weakness, particularly if a positive catalyst resets market sentiment before the trend formally reverses.
Operating margins of 60% and a Rule of 40 score of 63 — well above the 40 threshold — place this business in a top-tier position relative to its peers on profitability, signaling durable earnings power and above-average earnings quality.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Operating margin holds above 50% and the Rule of 40 score remains above 40 over the next four quarters, confirming the margin advantage is structural.
CounterThe moderate leverage at 1.1 times equity and the current negative momentum suggest the market may be pricing in a coming margin compression that the trailing figures do not yet show, limiting confidence that the current profitability level is stable.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 5.8 |
| ROA | 4.4 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 0.5 |
| FCF quality | 5.2 |
| Moat | 6.2 |
| Rule of 40 | 8.8 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Strong margins: 68%
- ▸Earnings quality warning: 67% FCF/NI
- ▸Rule of 40: 54 (pass)
Growth
7.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.6 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 7.2 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat
Sentiment
7.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 8.0 |
| Price target | 7.3 |
| erm sentiment | 5.6 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (9.0) — signal dampened
Insider
7.3/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
5.5/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.4 |
| quality rank | 7.5 |
| growth rank | 6.2 |
- ▸Best-in-class margins
Technical
4.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.9 |
| support resistance | 2.8 |
| 52w position | 8.7 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.1 |
| days to cover | 0.9 |
| volatility | 8.5 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 1.2 |
| beta | 8.4 |
| debt equity | 4.9 |
- ▸High IV: 73%
Catalyst
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.9 |
| dividend safety | 4.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Earnings today
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Earnings today. Wait until post-earnings.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L3:NEWS_BLOCK|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDPassed (5)
- MOMENTUM:5.7>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- ASYMMETRY:0.2<1.5@spot
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:0d<=7d
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
0.23
Upside
+1.2%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
STARTER
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.1B<$5B
Investment implication
A recent news event triggered an L3 news-block on the verdict path. Trigger: Earnings today. Wait until post-earnings. The 10-dimension scores remain Value at 7.7 (strongest), but ASYMMETRY:0.2<1.5@spot also fails — the news block is the proximate trigger, not the sole driver.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.7, Growth at 7.3, and Insider at 7.3; the weakest are Technical at 4.1, Catalyst at 4.7, and Peer rank at 5.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.23 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Attractive Valuation Analyst Upside
Trip ifForward P/E expands above 12x as earnings estimates are revised downward, eliminating the valuation discount.
- P2Best In Class Margins Quality
Trip ifOperating margin compresses below 50% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Consistent Earnings Delivery
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Confirmed Technical Downtrend Headwind
Trip ifPrice reclaims and holds above the 200-day moving average for 4 consecutive weeks while OBV turns upward, confirming the downtrend has reversed.