Skip to main content
GRPNGroupon, Inc.Sell5.2·$16.45
GRPN · Why this verdict

Why Groupon (GRPN) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Groupon generates positive free cash flow (12% margin) despite a GAAP loss and trades 46% below its high with the price 51.2% below the analyst target, but revenue is flat, estimates are falling 37.1% and short interest is 48%.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Groupon is free-cash-flow positive despite a GAAP loss, with an FCF margin of 12% and an FCF yield of 8.9%, which cushions the weak accounting profit.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
FCF margin should stay above 8% over the next 12 months while GAAP results move toward break-even.

CounterPositive free cash flow alongside a net loss can reflect working-capital timing or non-cash charges, and with no moat and a Rule of 40 reading of 11 it may not be durable.

Revenue is slightly declining (-1%), with the latest quarter at about $124.7M versus $125.7M a year earlier, so the top line is not growing.

→Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Quarterly revenue should return to growth and reach the $129.4M next-quarter estimate within 12 months.

CounterRevenue has been stuck in a $115M to $133M range for two years, so a stable base may be all the company can deliver.

Earnings estimates have fallen 37.1% over the last 30 days, which points to analysts cutting expectations ahead of the 2026-11-05 report.

→Stable
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
Estimate revisions should stabilize so that 30-day estimate changes are no worse than -10%.

CounterThe company beat in August ($-0.04 versus $-0.06) and a lowered bar makes a beat more likely.

EPS surprises are extreme in both directions, including -$2.92 versus +$0.03 in November 2025, and 2 of the last 4 reports were misses.

→Stable
Avg surprise pct
Expectation
EPS should land within 25% of the estimate in each of the next four reports.

CounterLarge one-off charges drive the worst misses, and the last report beat by 29%, which may signal that results are normalizing.

The $16.12 price is 51.2% below the $24.37 analyst target, yet short interest is 48% and momentum is 1.7/10, so the market is betting against the recovery.

→Stable
Upside pct
Expectation
Price should close part of the gap to the target as short interest falls below 30%.

CounterHeavy short interest with an RSI of 24 below the 200-day average shows sellers are in control, and a squeeze would be needed to close the gap.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.5/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
P/S9.4
Fwd P/E9.7
PEG10.0
Analyst target9.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 7.0x
  • ▸PEG: 0.04
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

4.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROA0.5
Gross margin10.0
Op margin0.8
Net margin0.0
Current ratio3.2
FCF quality6.3
Moat5.2
Rule of 403.0
Piotroski F6.7
  • ▸FCF-positive despite GAAP loss (FCF margin 12%, FCF yield 8.7%)
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Rule of 40: 11 (fail)

Growth

6.2/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth2.3
EPS growth10.0
  • ▸Declining revenue: -1%

Momentum

1.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.0
MACD3.2
OBV1.0
MA position2.2
Volume0.0
  • ▸Capitulation risk (RSI 29, below 200MA)
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+1.3%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target9.9
erm sentiment0.0
  • ▸Analyst upside: 74%
  • ▸Estimates falling as sentiment proxy (-37.1%)

Insider

6.0/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change10.0
notable moves3.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

3.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank6.4
quality rank0.4
growth rank1.4

Technical

5.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger7.4
support resistance8.4
52w position1.0

Risk (lower is worse)

3.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest0.0
days to cover0.0
volatility0.0
put call7.9
implied vol0.0
max pain risk7.0
beta10.0
  • ▸High short interest: 50%
  • ▸High IV: 109%

Catalyst

2.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm1.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
  • ▸Estimates down -37.1% (30d)
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • ▸Earnings in 7 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (6)
  • ASYMMETRY:4.6>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:1.9<4.5
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:7d<=7d
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
4.57
Upside
+48.1%
Downside
10.5%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.7B) below institutional reach

SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -45% (>40% off 52w high)

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 1.9<4.5 outcome against Value at 9.5 and asymmetric R:R of 4.57.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.5, Growth at 6.2, and Insider at 6.0; the weakest are Momentum at 1.9, Catalyst at 2.3, and Peer rank at 3.3. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 4.57 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Fcf Positive Despite Loss

    Trip ifFree cash flow margin falls below 5% from the current 12%.

  • P2Flat Declining Revenue

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $115M from the latest $124.7M.

  • P3Falling Estimates

    Trip ifEarnings estimates fall by more than 50% over 30 days from the current -37.1%.

  • P4Erratic Earnings Record

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below -25% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P5Analyst Upside Vs Short Interest

    Trip ifPrice falls below $15.34, the stop level, from the current $16.12.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › GRPN › Why this verdict