Value
3.0/10data confidence 60%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 4.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| p ocf | 4.7 |
- ▸P/OCF: 24.2x (FFO proxy — REITs gated off P/E)
- ▸Expensive valuation
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Farmland Partners is an expensive small-cap REIT (price to operating cash flow of 24.4x) with declining revenue, recent earnings misses and a price 12.9% above the analyst target, offset only by strong margins and a 3.5% dividend.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Price to operating cash flow is 24.4x, flagged as an expensive valuation that scores 3.0 out of 10 on value. Valuation breakdown | Valuation compresses toward 15x cash flow through price stability and growing cash flow. | →Stable |
| CounterFarmland carries hard-asset value that cash-flow multiples understate, and scarce assets can justify a premium to FFO. | ||
Revenue is declining, down 6%, and quarterly revenue of $9.4M is below the $10.3M from a year earlier. Growth breakdown | Revenue returns to positive year-over-year growth within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA reported December quarter of $20.7M shows large one-time items distort comparisons, so the decline may be partly timing. | ||
The last two quarters missed estimates ($0.01 versus $0.03 and $0.02 versus $0.04), after two beats. Last 4 quarters | EPS beats consensus in the next report and in at least two of four quarters. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterPer-share amounts are a few cents, so small dollar differences produce large percentage misses and the average surprise is actually +74%. | ||
At $10.25 the stock trades 12.9% above the $8.92 analyst target, leaving no analyst-supported upside. Upside pct | Analyst targets rise above the current price as asset values are marked up. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst targets for thinly covered REITs often lag land value changes, and the 200-day average is still rising. | ||
Margins are strong at 50% and the dividend yield is 3.5%, giving income support despite weak growth. Quality breakdown | The dividend is maintained and free cash flow stays above 65% of net income. | →Stable |
| CounterOnly 65% of net income converts to free cash flow, and dividend safety scores 6.5 out of 10 with falling revenue. | ||
CounterFarmland carries hard-asset value that cash-flow multiples understate, and scarce assets can justify a premium to FFO.
CounterA reported December quarter of $20.7M shows large one-time items distort comparisons, so the decline may be partly timing.
CounterPer-share amounts are a few cents, so small dollar differences produce large percentage misses and the average surprise is actually +74%.
CounterAnalyst targets for thinly covered REITs often lag land value changes, and the 200-day average is still rising.
CounterOnly 65% of net income converts to free cash flow, and dividend safety scores 6.5 out of 10 with falling revenue.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 4.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| p ocf | 4.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.7 |
| ROA | 1.3 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.1 |
| FCF quality | 5.0 |
| Moat | 5.4 |
| Rule of 40 | 5.5 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.1 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 3.4 |
| OBV | 5.5 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 2.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 2.5 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 6.3 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.6 |
| quality rank | 6.2 |
| growth rank | 0.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.0 |
| support resistance | 8.3 |
| 52w position | 5.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.5 |
| days to cover | 5.2 |
| volatility | 6.5 |
| put call | 9.8 |
| implied vol | 7.6 |
| beta | 8.8 |
| debt equity | 8.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 3.5 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 6.5 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 40 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.0 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.2) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.5<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-2.4=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -2.38 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.2, Technical at 7.0, and Insider at 6.1; the weakest are Growth at 0.6, Value at 3.0, and Momentum at 3.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.38 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPrice to operating cash flow falls below 15x from the current 24.4x.
Trip ifYear-over-year revenue growth exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifAnalyst target rises above $11.28, at least 10% above the current $10.25 price.
Trip ifFree cash flow falls below 50% of net income from the current 65%.