Skip to main content
FASTFastenal CompanyHold5.7·$51.45
FAST · Why this verdict

Why Fastenal (FAST) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Fastenal is a genuinely high-quality compounding franchise — wide economic moat, 34% return on equity, best-in-class margins of approximately 15%, and a perfect financial health score — but at 33.6 times forward earnings with a PEG of 3.32, the stock is priced for excellence at a level where the analyst consensus target has already been reached; uninspiring recent earnings delivery and elevated options defensiveness compound the case for patience over new exposure.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The business earns a return on equity of 34%, maintains net margins of approximately 15%, carries a wide economic moat, and scores at the maximum on its financial health assessment — a combination of compounding-quality characteristics that justifies a premium multiple over time and provides a durable buffer in an economic slowdown.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Net margins remain above 14% and return on equity stays above 28% for the next 4 consecutive quarters.

CounterThe 34% return on equity may be inflated by a buyback-reduced equity base rather than reflecting genuine economic returns on invested capital; if the underlying return on assets is more modest than ROE implies, the quality premium embedded in the current multiple is partly illusory.

At 33.6 times forward earnings and a PEG of 3.32, the stock screens as one of the most expensive names in its universe, and the analyst consensus target has essentially been reached at current levels; this leaves almost no margin of safety and limits the expected return even under an optimistic fundamental scenario.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Forward price-to-earnings multiple compresses below 25 times from the current 33.6 times within 12 months.

CounterA premium multiple can persist indefinitely when underpinned by franchise quality and recurring industrial distribution demand; if earnings growth re-accelerates, the PEG may compress organically without requiring a de-rating of the stock.

The last four quarters include one beat, two in-line results, and one miss, with an average positive surprise of under 2%; a premium-valued franchise typically must consistently exceed expectations to sustain its multiple, and this delivery record does not meet that standard.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
Average quarterly EPS surprise rises above 5% and stays there for 3 consecutive quarters.

CounterTwo consecutive in-line quarters at essentially zero surprise may reflect tight guidance precision rather than operational weakness; management may be setting expectations conservatively, preserving room to beat when a more favorable operating environment emerges.

The put/call ratio of 1.37 indicates options market participants are positioned more defensively than offensively; with the stock trading above its options market equilibrium level, the combination of elevated defensive hedging and a rich fundamental valuation raises the probability of a reversion toward that equilibrium.

↑Improving
Options
Expectation
Put/call ratio falls below 0.8 and sustains there for 4 consecutive weeks.

CounterElevated put/call ratios in high-quality names often reflect institutional hedging of existing long equity positions rather than outright bearish bets; unwinding of those hedges on a positive catalyst could itself become a mechanical tailwind.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

3.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E2.9
P/S5.9
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E2.9
PEG3.5
Analyst target3.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 36.5x
  • ▸PEG: 3.33

Quality

8.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA10.0
Gross margin4.9
Op margin8.6
Net margin7.8
Current ratio9.1
FCF quality5.0
Moat8.2
Piotroski F10.0
  • ▸Excellent ROE: 35%
  • ▸Strong margins: 16%
  • ▸Earnings quality warning: 65% FCF/NI
  • ▸Wide economic moat

Growth

6.2/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth6.4
EPS growth6.1

Momentum

4.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD6.9
OBV1.7
MA position9.0
Volume1.2
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment6.5
Analyst rating5.0
Price target4.9

Insider

5.3/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.7
  • ▸Negligible insider selling — $2,381,860 (0.004% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

6.7/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank0.6
quality rank9.2
growth rank7.4
  • ▸Superior ROE vs peers
  • ▸Best-in-class margins

Technical

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger3.6
support resistance2.1
52w position9.5

Risk (lower is worse)

7.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.2
days to cover6.0
volatility5.2
put call10.0
implied vol7.5
max pain risk3.0
beta8.9
debt equity9.6
  • ▸Above max pain $25

Catalyst

3.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm6.5
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg2.5
dividend safety3.0
news activity5.0
  • ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position. | News modifier +1 (SELL_IF_HOLDING → HOLD_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:4.9>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:81d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE
Warning (2)
  • MOMENTUM:4.9<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.60
Upside
-13.6%
Downside
8.5%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 58, MACD bullish

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityConservative — Beta 0.69<0.8, Div 2.0%, Q=8.2

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 8.2) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.60 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 8.2, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.3, and Peer rank at 6.7; the weakest are Value at 3.1, Catalyst at 3.7, and Momentum at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.60 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Premium Quality Franchise

    Trip ifNet margin falls below 13% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Rich Valuation Limits Upside

    Trip ifForward price-to-earnings multiple compresses below 25 times from current 33.6 times.

  • P3Soft Earnings Delivery

    Trip ifAverage EPS surprise rises above 5% and stays there for 3 consecutive quarters.

  • P4Elevated Put Call Ratio

    Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 0.5 for 4 consecutive weeks.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › FAST › Why this verdict