Value
5.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.7 |
| P/S | 7.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.1 |
| PEG | 4.8 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 21.1x
- ▸PEG: 1.67
ETR · Why this verdict
Why Entergy (ETR) is rated BUY WAIT
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score4.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
The stock has already reached and exceeded its near-term resistance target with deeply negative free cash flow, high leverage, and a high-severity regulatory concentration tied to a single nuclear facility — making the current entry point unattractive despite three beats in the last four quarters and rising on-balance volume.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The current price has surpassed the near-term resistance target, leaving no technical headroom on the upside — and with an unfavorable risk/reward, the balance of probability favors waiting for a more attractive entry over adding at current levels. Bear case | This concern would resolve if the analyst consensus target were to be revised substantially higher, establishing more than 8% of new room above the current price. | →Stable |
| CounterRegulated utilities can re-rate upward as the market revises rate expectations; a meaningfully lower interest-rate environment could justify higher multiples and push the consensus target well above where the price sits today. | ||
Free cash flow is deeply negative — standing at -220% relative to net income — meaning reported earnings are not converting into cash and the company is consuming more cash than it generates on an operating basis. Quality breakdown | This pillar would be falsified if free cash flow relative to net income turns positive and sustains above 0% for two consecutive annual reporting periods. | →Stable |
| CounterCapital-intensive regulated utilities often show negative free cash flow during heavy construction cycles; investment in rate base may be regulatory-approved and expected to earn an allowed return, converting today's cash consumption into accretive earnings over time. | ||
The business carries a high-severity regulatory concentration tied to a single nuclear facility — a single adverse regulatory decision, cost overrun, or safety event at that plant could have an outsized impact on earnings and credit quality that a more diversified asset base would absorb more easily. Risk breakdown | This risk would diminish if the company's annual risk factor disclosures no longer list this as a high-severity item — dropping from 1 HIGH to 0 HIGH concentration items. | →Stable |
| CounterNuclear plants under regulated frameworks typically receive cost recovery, and their value as reliable carbon-free baseload capacity is increasingly recognized by regulators; the concentration risk may carry less practical downside than it appears on paper. | ||
Three of the last four quarters were earnings beats, and the most recent quarter delivered a 2.26% positive surprise — providing partial support for management credibility even as the overall financial profile remains strained. Earnings | This positive holds if the company continues to beat estimates in at least three of the next four quarters, keeping the average EPS surprise above 0%. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe second most recent quarter was a miss, and the most recent beat was only 2.26% — the narrowing beat magnitude suggests the reliable-delivery track record is thinning rather than building. | ||
The current price has surpassed the near-term resistance target, leaving no technical headroom on the upside — and with an unfavorable risk/reward, the balance of probability favors waiting for a more attractive entry over adding at current levels.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- This concern would resolve if the analyst consensus target were to be revised substantially higher, establishing more than 8% of new room above the current price.
CounterRegulated utilities can re-rate upward as the market revises rate expectations; a meaningfully lower interest-rate environment could justify higher multiples and push the consensus target well above where the price sits today.
Free cash flow is deeply negative — standing at -220% relative to net income — meaning reported earnings are not converting into cash and the company is consuming more cash than it generates on an operating basis.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- This pillar would be falsified if free cash flow relative to net income turns positive and sustains above 0% for two consecutive annual reporting periods.
CounterCapital-intensive regulated utilities often show negative free cash flow during heavy construction cycles; investment in rate base may be regulatory-approved and expected to earn an allowed return, converting today's cash consumption into accretive earnings over time.
The business carries a high-severity regulatory concentration tied to a single nuclear facility — a single adverse regulatory decision, cost overrun, or safety event at that plant could have an outsized impact on earnings and credit quality that a more diversified asset base would absorb more easily.
→StableRisk breakdown
- Expectation
- This risk would diminish if the company's annual risk factor disclosures no longer list this as a high-severity item — dropping from 1 HIGH to 0 HIGH concentration items.
CounterNuclear plants under regulated frameworks typically receive cost recovery, and their value as reliable carbon-free baseload capacity is increasingly recognized by regulators; the concentration risk may carry less practical downside than it appears on paper.
Three of the last four quarters were earnings beats, and the most recent quarter delivered a 2.26% positive surprise — providing partial support for management credibility even as the overall financial profile remains strained.
↓DeterioratingEarnings
- Expectation
- This positive holds if the company continues to beat estimates in at least three of the next four quarters, keeping the average EPS surprise above 0%.
CounterThe second most recent quarter was a miss, and the most recent beat was only 2.26% — the narrowing beat magnitude suggests the reliable-delivery track record is thinning rather than building.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.4 |
| ROA | 1.8 |
| Gross margin | 5.4 |
| Op margin | 9.8 |
| Net margin | 6.7 |
| Current ratio | 3.6 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: -245% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
2.8/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.0 |
| EPS growth | 1.6 |
Momentum
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 4.1 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 2.8 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 71)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 6.6 |
| erm sentiment | 4.7 |
Insider
5.2/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.3 |
- ▸Negligible insider selling — $1,431,082 (0.003% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.8 |
| quality rank | 5.4 |
| growth rank | 6.3 |
Technical
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.6 |
| support resistance | 0.9 |
| 52w position | 8.3 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.0 |
| days to cover | 4.8 |
| volatility | 8.6 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 6.7 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 3.3 |
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 3.6 |
| dividend safety | 3.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Earnings in 3 days
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Earnings in 3 days. Wait until post-earnings.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L3:NEWS_BLOCK|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDPassed (6)
- MOMENTUM:6.1>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.0=NEGATIVE
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:3d<=7d
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-0.01
Upside
-0.1%
Downside
9.3%
Sizing output
STARTER
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
A recent news event triggered an L3 news-block on the verdict path. Trigger: Earnings in 3 days. Wait until post-earnings. The 10-dimension scores remain Risk (lower is worse) at 7.3 (strongest), but ASYMMETRY:-0.0=NEGATIVE also fails — the news block is the proximate trigger, not the sole driver.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.3, Sentiment at 6.5, and Momentum at 6.1; the weakest are Growth at 2.8, Technical at 3.6, and Peer rank at 3.6. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.01 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Price Exceeds Target No Upside
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $120, creating more than 8% of upside from current levels.
- P2Deeply Negative Free Cash Flow
Trip ifFree cash flow relative to net income turns positive and exceeds 0% for 2 consecutive annual reporting periods.
- P3Single Asset Regulatory Concentration
Trip ifDisclosed high-severity regulatory concentration items fall below 1 in the next annual risk factor filing.
- P4Earnings Consistency Partial Support
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.