Value
8.4/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.2 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 29.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.21
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The engine flags three value-trap signals for Evolus: operating margin compression to -8.2%, material insider selling of 3 sells totaling 0.03% of market cap, and negative free cash flow. Bear case | Operating margin should move toward breakeven and insider selling should abate. | →Stable |
| CounterModest insider sales of 0.03% of market cap are common for tax or diversification reasons and don't necessarily signal a loss of confidence. | ||
The engine models a highly asymmetric setup for Evolus, with 84.9% upside against 12.3% downside, producing a risk/reward ratio near 6.9. Targets | The stock should move meaningfully toward its modeled upside target over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterExtreme asymmetry ratios in small-cap specialty pharma often reflect analyst target overreach rather than a genuinely achievable outcome. | ||
Evolus has failed the engine's momentum gate at 3.8 against a 4.5 threshold, consistent with the key risk of negative price momentum. Warnings | Momentum score should recover above 4.5. | →Stable |
| CounterA single momentum gate failure ahead of an earnings catalyst in about a month could reverse quickly on a positive surprise. | ||
Options markets show an extremely elevated put/call ratio of 83.38, a level the engine specifically flags as a risk factor. Risk breakdown | The put/call ratio should normalize toward a more typical range, under 2.0. | →Stable |
| CounterAn extreme put/call ratio in a low-open-interest name is often a statistical artifact of thin options volume rather than a genuine bearish signal. | ||
CounterModest insider sales of 0.03% of market cap are common for tax or diversification reasons and don't necessarily signal a loss of confidence.
CounterExtreme asymmetry ratios in small-cap specialty pharma often reflect analyst target overreach rather than a genuinely achievable outcome.
CounterA single momentum gate failure ahead of an earnings catalyst in about a month could reverse quickly on a positive surprise.
CounterAn extreme put/call ratio in a low-open-interest name is often a statistical artifact of thin options volume rather than a genuine bearish signal.
Evolus offers a highly asymmetric modeled upside, but margin compression, insider selling, a failed momentum gate, and an extreme put/call ratio all flag elevated risk.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.2 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 9.2 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 7.1 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.2 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 3.4 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 8.0 |
| Volume | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 8.0 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.7 |
| quality rank | 1.2 |
| growth rank | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.2 |
| support resistance | 4.8 |
| 52w position | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.5 |
| days to cover | 2.2 |
| volatility | 1.6 |
| put call | 4.7 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 5.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 58 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.32>1.3, MCap $0.5B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 8.4 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.4, Sentiment at 7.5, and Insider at 7.5; the weakest are Quality at 3.6, Catalyst at 3.7, and Risk (lower is worse) at 3.8. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 9.73 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifUpside_pct falls below 40% at the next engine run without a corresponding price increase.
Trip ifOperating margin stays below -8% for 2 more consecutive quarters.
Trip ifMomentum score stays below 4.5 for 2 more consecutive runs.
Trip ifPut/call ratio stays above 50 for 2 more consecutive updates.