Skip to main content
EENI S.p.A.Sell6.1·$59.65
E · Why this verdict

Why ENI S.p.A. (E) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

ENI shows strong 27% YoY revenue growth and an attractive 9.5x forward P/E, but the price is already above the analyst target (negative 22.6% upside), the stock is overbought at an RSI of 88, and the earnings jump looks tied to a commodity-price surge.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The forward-to-trailing earnings ratio of 0.44x with a 9.5x forward P/E points to a commodity-cycle peak, where earnings may fall back as prices normalize.

↓Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
Forward EPS estimates are not cut by more than 20% over the next 12 months.

CounterIf energy prices stay elevated, the peak call fails and earnings keep compounding; the bear case here is a timing bet against the commodity.

ENI is growing revenue 27% YoY, which supports a strong growth profile for an integrated oil and gas company.

↑Improving
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue growth stays above 10% YoY over the next 12 months, and next-quarter revenue approaches the $26.5B estimate.

CounterGrowth in an integrated energy company tracks commodity prices; if oil and gas prices roll over, the 27% growth could reverse quickly.

ENI trades at a forward P/E of 9.5x and a PEG of 0.44, which reads as attractively valued on earnings.

↑Improving
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Forward P/E stays below 12x while earnings hold, keeping the valuation cheap versus the sector.

CounterThe low forward multiple may be a commodity-cycle peak illusion: EPS just expanded off a price surge and the forward estimate may be built on stale spot prices, so mean reversion is unpriced.

At $62.08 the price is 22.6% above the $48.08 analyst target and 0.1% from its 52-week high, so the stock offers limited upside versus analyst expectations.

↑Improving
Analyst target
Expectation
Either the analyst target is raised toward the $62 price or the price drifts back toward the $48 target.

CounterAnalyst targets lag in strong rallies; the stock has strong momentum (8.1/10, rising volume) and could keep rising past the target.

The stock is overbought with an RSI of 88, and the earnings record is mixed with 2 beats and 2 misses and an average surprise of -0.7%.

↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
RSI cools below 70 without price falling more than 10%, and the next report on 2027-02-25 beats estimates.

CounterOverbought readings can persist in a strong trend, and the earnings history in the data is dated (latest listed 2024-02-16), so it may understate current execution.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E7.2
P/S9.7
EV/EBITDA7.4
Fwd P/E9.4
PEG10.0
Analyst target3.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 9.0x
  • ▸PEG: 0.45
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

4.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.4
ROA2.4
Gross margin0.4
Op margin3.4
Net margin3.9
Current ratio4.6
FCF quality5.7
Moat6.1
Piotroski F7.8
  • ▸Earnings quality warning: 76% FCF/NI
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

9.2/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth9.2
  • ▸Strong growth: 27% YoY

Momentum

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD10.0
OBV9.9
MA position9.0
Volume1.3
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment6.2
Analyst rating5.0
Price target4.2

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%

Peer rank

3.1/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank4.3
quality rank1.8
growth rank1.8

Technical

4.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger2.7
support resistance2.9
52w position9.2

Risk (lower is worse)

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest10.0
days to cover8.6
volatility7.0
put call5.9
implied vol6.0
max pain risk3.0
beta10.0
debt equity6.8
news risk5.0
  • ▸Above max pain $25

Catalyst

4.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg2.1
dividend safety5.8
news activity8.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • ▸Dividend: 4.1%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Mixed signals. Hold existing position. | News modifier -1 (HOLD_IF_HOLDING → SELL_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD_DEFAULT|L3:NEWS_MOD=-1
Passed (5)
  • MOMENTUM:7.0>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:119d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.8=NEGATIVE
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:fwd=9.0x,ratio=0.51x
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-1.78
Upside
-17.9%
Downside
10.1%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 68, MACD bullish

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

The default F-path HOLD fired without any positive-conviction gate triggering — no momentum acceleration, no quality+value crossover, no setup recognition. Highest-clear gate: MOMENTUM:7.0>=5.5. Top dim: Growth at 9.2; weakest: Peer rank at 3.1. The engine's read is one of pattern absence — no directional conviction in either direction at current asymmetry.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.2, Value at 7.7, and Momentum at 7.0; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.1, Quality at 4.3, and Catalyst at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.78 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Strong Revenue Growth

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 5% YoY from current 27%.

  • P2Attractive Forward Valuation

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 14x from current 9.5x.

  • P3Commodity Cycle Peak Risk

    Trip ifForward EPS estimates fall more than 20% from current levels.

  • P4Price Above Analyst Target

    Trip ifPrice falls more than 13.6% from $62.08, hitting the downside level near $53.6.

  • P5Overbought With Mixed Earnings

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › E › Why this verdict