Value
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.8 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 1.1 |
| PEG | 5.4 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 77.1x
- ▸PEG: 1.39
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The bear case flags earnings expected to decline roughly 75% off a cyclical peak, and the engine separately warns of a cyclical trap where the forward P/E of 77.4x sits far above the trailing 19x multiple, implying today's trailing earnings are not sustainable. Warnings | If this risk holds, expect trailing earnings to fall materially and the forward P/E to stay elevated relative to trailing over the next few reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterThe quality notes show excellent cash conversion (130% FCF/NI) and a strong Piotroski F-score of 7 out of 9, so the underlying balance sheet may be resilient enough to weather a cyclical earnings downturn without much value destruction. | ||
The bull case cites a strong growth profile, and growth scores 7.7 overall with the earnings-growth component maxed at 10.0. Bull case | The growth score should hold above 7 if the growth profile persists over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThis 'strong growth' reading directly conflicts with the separately flagged expectation of a roughly 75% earnings decline off a cyclical peak, suggesting the growth score may be capturing trailing momentum right before a downturn rather than a sustainable trajectory. | ||
The engine's risk-reward gate failed with a negative asymmetry ratio of -1.03, since the analyst target has already been reached, leaving the take-profit set by a nearby resistance level with modeled downside (14.4%) exceeding upside. Bear case | If this holds, expect the stock to trade capped near its resistance-based target without a new, higher analyst target being set over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong cash generation and a solid quality profile could support a re-rating that establishes new resistance and analyst targets above current levels. | ||
The technical setup shows a golden-cross breakout with RSI at 67 and a bullish MACD, yet momentum failed the engine's gate at 4.4 versus a 4.5 threshold. Engine gate (failed) | For the breakout to be confirmed, momentum needs to climb just above the 4.5 threshold over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe momentum notes also flag falling on-balance volume, meaning the breakout may lack the volume confirmation needed to clear the threshold. | ||
The catalyst notes flag a yield-trap warning, describing the dividend as high-yield but unsafe, adding a distinct income-sustainability risk on top of the cyclical earnings concern. Catalyst breakdown | If this risk holds, expect the dividend to be cut or the safety flag to persist over the next several quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterThe dividend-safety component itself scores a moderate 4.2, not the lowest possible reading, suggesting the risk, while real, may not be imminent. | ||
CounterThe quality notes show excellent cash conversion (130% FCF/NI) and a strong Piotroski F-score of 7 out of 9, so the underlying balance sheet may be resilient enough to weather a cyclical earnings downturn without much value destruction.
CounterThis 'strong growth' reading directly conflicts with the separately flagged expectation of a roughly 75% earnings decline off a cyclical peak, suggesting the growth score may be capturing trailing momentum right before a downturn rather than a sustainable trajectory.
CounterStrong cash generation and a solid quality profile could support a re-rating that establishes new resistance and analyst targets above current levels.
CounterThe momentum notes also flag falling on-balance volume, meaning the breakout may lack the volume confirmation needed to clear the threshold.
CounterThe dividend-safety component itself scores a moderate 4.2, not the lowest possible reading, suggesting the risk, while real, may not be imminent.
Cementos Pacasmayo shows a strong growth profile and a technical breakout, but the engine flags a cyclical earnings trap with a roughly 75% expected earnings decline, an already-reached analyst target with negative risk-reward, a failed momentum gate, and an unsafe dividend yield, keeping conviction and position sizing at essentially zero.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.8 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 1.1 |
| PEG | 5.4 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 4.8 |
| ROA | 5.1 |
| Gross margin | 3.9 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 4.2 |
| Current ratio | 4.5 |
| FCF quality | 9.3 |
| Moat | 6.1 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.3 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 3.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.1 |
| Price target | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.9 |
| quality rank | 4.6 |
| growth rank | 5.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.0 |
| support resistance | 3.7 |
| 52w position | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| days to cover | 8.9 |
| volatility | 4.6 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 4.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.8 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.0B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.4 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 7.7) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.7<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-1.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.19 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 7.7, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.6, and Insider at 7.3; the weakest are Catalyst at 3.3, Momentum at 3.7, and Peer rank at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.19 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifTrailing earnings decline by less than 20%, well short of the expected 75% cyclical drop.
Trip ifGrowth score falls below 4.0 from the current 7.7 as the cyclical earnings decline takes hold.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio rises above 1.0, clearing into positive territory from the current -1.03 reading.
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 4.5, clearing the engine's gate from the current 4.4 reading.
Trip ifDividend-safety score rises above 7.0 from the current 4.2, or the payout is maintained without a cut for 4 consecutive quarters.