Value
6.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 36.5x
- ▸PEG: 0.34
CODI · Why this verdict
Why D/B/A Compass Diversified Holdi (CODI) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The earnings-growth component scores a maximum 10.0 even as revenue-growth notes flag a declining top line of -6%, suggesting margin expansion or cost discipline is lifting profitability despite shrinking sales. Growth breakdown | The earnings-growth score should hold near 10 and margin metrics should continue improving over the next 12 months even if revenue stays soft. | →Stable |
| CounterTwo of the last four quarters were large misses (-215%, -102%), so the earnings-growth reading may be an artifact of comparing against a weak prior-year base rather than a durable margin improvement. | ||
Insiders have been net buyers, purchasing a net $372,038 of stock (0.047% of market cap) across 4 buy and 2 sell transactions over the past 90 days, driving a bullish insider signal. Insider breakdown | Insider buying should continue to outweigh selling, keeping the bullish signal intact over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe buying is described as only 'modest' relative to market cap, and 2 sell transactions occurred alongside the 4 buys, so the signal is directionally positive but not overwhelming. | ||
The engine's asymmetry gate failed, with a risk-reward ratio of just 0.38 against a 1.5 minimum, reflecting only 4.1% modeled upside against 10.8% downside. Engine gate (failed) | For the gate to clear, the asymmetry ratio needs to climb above 1.5 as upside expands or downside risk narrows over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterOptions-market max pain sits at $17.00, well above the current $10.61 price, suggesting options positioning may imply more upside than the engine's own risk-reward framework currently captures. | ||
The technical setup is range-bound with RSI at a neutral 56 and Bollinger Bands at the mid-band, and the engine's own edge assessment finds no clear trading edge, keeping conviction at none. Edge rationale | If this remains true, expect the stock to continue trading range-bound without a clear directional edge over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterMomentum notes cite rising on-balance volume and price above the 200-day moving average, both constructive signs that could eventually resolve into a clearer directional edge. | ||
Quality sits below the engine's investability floor at 2.9 versus a 4.0 minimum, driven by cash-burning operations (free cash flow at -3% of revenue) and no competitive moat. Quality breakdown | Quality should rise above the 4.0 floor as free cash flow turns positive over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA current ratio of 9.0 signals very strong liquidity and the Piotroski F-score of 6.7 is comparatively solid, suggesting the balance sheet is more resilient than the quality score alone implies. | ||
The earnings-growth component scores a maximum 10.0 even as revenue-growth notes flag a declining top line of -6%, suggesting margin expansion or cost discipline is lifting profitability despite shrinking sales.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- The earnings-growth score should hold near 10 and margin metrics should continue improving over the next 12 months even if revenue stays soft.
CounterTwo of the last four quarters were large misses (-215%, -102%), so the earnings-growth reading may be an artifact of comparing against a weak prior-year base rather than a durable margin improvement.
Insiders have been net buyers, purchasing a net $372,038 of stock (0.047% of market cap) across 4 buy and 2 sell transactions over the past 90 days, driving a bullish insider signal.
→StableInsider breakdown
- Expectation
- Insider buying should continue to outweigh selling, keeping the bullish signal intact over the next 12 months.
CounterThe buying is described as only 'modest' relative to market cap, and 2 sell transactions occurred alongside the 4 buys, so the signal is directionally positive but not overwhelming.
The engine's asymmetry gate failed, with a risk-reward ratio of just 0.38 against a 1.5 minimum, reflecting only 4.1% modeled upside against 10.8% downside.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- For the gate to clear, the asymmetry ratio needs to climb above 1.5 as upside expands or downside risk narrows over the next 12 months.
CounterOptions-market max pain sits at $17.00, well above the current $10.61 price, suggesting options positioning may imply more upside than the engine's own risk-reward framework currently captures.
The technical setup is range-bound with RSI at a neutral 56 and Bollinger Bands at the mid-band, and the engine's own edge assessment finds no clear trading edge, keeping conviction at none.
→StableEdge rationale
- Expectation
- If this remains true, expect the stock to continue trading range-bound without a clear directional edge over the next 12 months.
CounterMomentum notes cite rising on-balance volume and price above the 200-day moving average, both constructive signs that could eventually resolve into a clearer directional edge.
Quality sits below the engine's investability floor at 2.9 versus a 4.0 minimum, driven by cash-burning operations (free cash flow at -3% of revenue) and no competitive moat.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Quality should rise above the 4.0 floor as free cash flow turns positive over the next 12 months.
CounterA current ratio of 9.0 signals very strong liquidity and the Piotroski F-score of 6.7 is comparatively solid, suggesting the balance sheet is more resilient than the quality score alone implies.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Compass Diversified Holdings shows bullish insider buying and earnings growth accelerating even as revenue declines, but a failed risk-reward gate, no identifiable trading edge in a range-bound setup, and quality below the investability floor keep conviction and position sizing at essentially zero.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.9 |
| Gross margin | 4.7 |
| Op margin | 1.7 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 3.2 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Cash-burning: FCF -3% of revenue
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
5.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -6%
Momentum
3.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 6.3 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.6 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 29%
Insider
7.8/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.5 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
- ▸Insider buying (low materiality) — $113,800 (0.015% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
2.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.2 |
| quality rank | 0.6 |
| growth rank | 0.6 |
Technical
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.6 |
| support resistance | 7.7 |
| 52w position | 5.9 |
| gap | 6.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
2.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.0 |
| days to cover | 6.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 6.0 |
| debt equity | 1.2 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 2.46
- ▸High IV: 98%
Catalyst
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
- ▸Dividend: 9.4%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:27d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:3.5<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:0.8<1.5@spot
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
0.85
Upside
+9.6%
Downside
11.3%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 49 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.8B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Insider at 7.8 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.5<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.8, Technical at 6.5, and Value at 6.3; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.6, Risk (lower is worse) at 2.9, and Quality at 2.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.85 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Earnings Growth Despite Revenue Decline
Trip ifEarnings-growth score falls below 5.0 from the current 10.0 as year-over-year comparisons normalize.
- P2Bullish Insider Buying
Trip ifNet insider selling exceeds $1 million over a 90-day window, reversing the current bullish signal.
- P3Failed Asymmetry Gate
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio rises above 1.5, clearing the engine's gate from the current 0.38 reading.
- P4No Identifiable Edge In Range Bound Setup
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 7.5 as the setup breaks out of its current range-bound pattern.
- P5Quality Below Investability Floor
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from the current 2.9.