Value
7.1/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.01
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Cognyte is flagged with a wide economic moat and a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9, even though free cash flow margins remain modest at about 9% and the Rule of 40 score of 20 is a fail. Quality breakdown | The Rule of 40 score should climb above 40 over the next 12 months, aligning growth and margin performance with the moat characterization. | →Stable |
| CounterImplied volatility is elevated at about 84%, suggesting the market isn't yet treating the wide-moat characterization as a source of stability. | ||
Cognyte screens as attractively valued, with a forward P/E near 11.7x and an unusually low PEG ratio of 0.01, and the quality assessment separately identifies a wide economic moat. Valuation breakdown | The value score should stay elevated and the discount should narrow via price appreciation over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterDespite the moat characterization, the overall quality score is still flagged as below average, tempering how much the cheap multiple should be trusted as a clean mispricing. | ||
Cognyte missed earnings estimates in its most recent reported quarter by about 65%, breaking a streak of three consecutive beats that ranged from 167% to 350%. Earnings | The company should return to beating or meeting estimates, with EPS surprise at or above 0% in the next reported quarter. | →Stable |
| CounterThree of the last four quarters were still beats, so a single miss may not signal a broader deterioration in execution. | ||
Cognyte's reward-to-risk ratio of 1.2 falls just short of the engine's 1.5 asymmetry bar, even though the stock passes its momentum check and carries roughly 16.6% upside to target against about 13.5% downside. Engine gate (failed) | The reward-to-risk ratio should climb above 1.5 over the next 12 months as either the upside target rises or the downside risk narrows. | →Stable |
| CounterA higher analyst-implied upside of about 37% than what's reflected in the current risk/reward calculation suggests there may be room for the ratio to improve as targets are reconciled. | ||
CounterImplied volatility is elevated at about 84%, suggesting the market isn't yet treating the wide-moat characterization as a source of stability.
CounterDespite the moat characterization, the overall quality score is still flagged as below average, tempering how much the cheap multiple should be trusted as a clean mispricing.
CounterThree of the last four quarters were still beats, so a single miss may not signal a broader deterioration in execution.
CounterA higher analyst-implied upside of about 37% than what's reflected in the current risk/reward calculation suggests there may be room for the ratio to improve as targets are reconciled.
Cognyte combines an attractively valued multiple, a wide economic moat, and a three-of-four-quarter earnings beat streak with a business quality score still flagged as below average, a Rule of 40 fail, and a risk/reward ratio that falls just short of the engine's asymmetry bar, making this a hold pending confirmation that the recent miss was a blip rather than a trend.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4 |
| ROA | 1.3 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 1.7 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| FCF quality | 5.8 |
| Moat | 7.9 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 8.7 |
| OBV | 6.2 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 2.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.7 |
| quality rank | 2.7 |
| growth rank | 3.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.7 |
| support resistance | 2.8 |
| 52w position | 4.6 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.6 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 2.7 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 4.4 |
| debt equity | 9.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.7B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.68>1.3, MCap $0.7B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:1.2<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.20 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.1, Catalyst at 6.7, and Sentiment at 6.3; the weakest are Technical at 4.0, Quality at 4.4, and Peer rank at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.20 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifShares decline more than 15% without any re-rating in the multiple, confirming continued de-rating instead of value realization.
Trip ifRule of 40 score rises above 40, reversing the current failing reading of 20.
Trip ifEPS surprise rises above 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, reversing the current miss.
Trip ifReward-to-risk ratio rises above 2.0, moving well past the current 1.2 reading and clearing the engine's asymmetry bar with room to spare.