Skip to main content
CDNACareDx, Inc.Sell6.2·$27.55-2.68%
CDNA · Why this verdict

Why CareDx (CDNA) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL

Thesis pillars

The company is FCF-positive despite a GAAP loss, with a 17% FCF margin and a 4.7% FCF yield, and it passes the engine's Rule of 40 test with a score of 56.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
The Rule of 40 score should stay above 40 and FCF margin should hold above 10% over the next 4 quarters.

CounterA Rule of 40 pass driven mostly by high revenue growth can mask a still-unprofitable core business on a GAAP basis, and growth could decelerate faster than margins improve.

Revenue growth is running at 39% year-over-year, pushing the engine's growth score to a maximum 10.0.

Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue growth should stay above 25% YoY over the next 4 reported quarters to sustain this pillar.

CounterGrowth this strong in a diagnostics testing company can decelerate sharply as reimbursement dynamics or test volume normalize off a smaller comparison base.

Insiders have sold $1,836,505 (0.122% of market cap) across 8 transactions in the past 90 days with zero buys, producing a bearish insider signal.

Stable
Insider
Expectation
Insider selling should slow to fewer than 4 transactions per quarter with net value sold below $1,000,000 if confidence is stabilizing.

CounterBroad-based selling spread across many transactions can reflect routine, pre-scheduled selling plans (Rule 10b5-1) among a diversified insider base rather than a coordinated signal of eroding confidence.

RSI at 72 signals an overbought condition even as on-balance volume is falling, a divergence that softened the momentum score to 5.4, just below the engine's 5.5 threshold.

Stable
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
RSI should cool into the 40-60 range without a price breakdown of more than 10% over the next month if the advance has genuine support.

CounterOverbought readings in high-growth healthcare names can persist for extended periods when a strong growth narrative is driving continued buying, regardless of short-term volume divergences.

TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

CareDx combines strong revenue growth and a Rule of 40 pass backed by positive free cash flow, but notable insider selling, an overbought momentum reading, and a below-floor risk score flagged by the engine argue for a cautious stance despite the growth story.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.7/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
P/S7.8
Fwd P/E4.9
PEG10.0
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 25.6x
  • PEG: 0.03

Quality

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.0
Gross margin9.8
Op margin0.6
Net margin0.0
Current ratio9.6
FCF quality6.9
Moat7.2
Rule of 409.0
Piotroski F8.9
  • FCF-positive despite GAAP loss (FCF margin 17%, FCF yield 4.7%)
  • Rule of 40: 56 (pass)
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

10.0/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth10.0
  • Strong growth: 39% YoY

Momentum

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD7.1
OBV1.0
MA position9.0
Volume7.5
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating6.5
Price target5.1
erm sentiment5.0
  • Light analyst coverage (5.0) — signal dampened

Insider

3.5/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality3.0
insider conviction2.0
holder change5.5
  • Notable insider selling — $1,836,505 (0.122% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

6.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank6.3
quality rank3.8
growth rank8.8
  • Industry growth leader
  • Conservative debt levels

Technical

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger3.7
support resistance2.9
52w position8.4
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

3.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest1.8
days to cover0.0
volatility0.0
put call8.6
implied vol0.0
max pain risk3.0
beta1.9
debt equity9.7
  • High short interest justified: 17%
  • High IV: 122%
  • Above max pain $18
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
  • Earnings concerns: 2B/2M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more. | News modifier -1 (HOLD_IF_HOLDING → SELL_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD|L3:NEWS_MOD=-1
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:5.9>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:29d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.8=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.81
Upside
-12.2%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBreakout Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 69, MACD bullish

EdgeNo clear edge No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive Beta 2.43>1.3, MCap $1.5B<$5B

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:5.9>=5.5. Top dim: Growth at 10.0; weakest: Risk (lower is worse) at 3.1. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Peer rank at 6.9, and Value at 6.7; the weakest are Risk (lower is worse) at 3.1, Insider at 3.5, and Technical at 5.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.81 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Rule Of 40 Pass With Positive Fcf

    Trip ifRule of 40 score falls below 40.

  • P2Strong Revenue Growth Profile

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 20% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3Notable Insider Selling Pressure

    Trip ifNet insider selling exceeds $3,000,000 over the next 90 days.

  • P4Overbought Momentum Near Highs

    Trip ifPrice falls more than 10% within the next month while RSI stays above 65.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks CDNA Why this verdict