Value
6.5/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 4.9 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company is cash-burning at -31% of revenue and fails the engine's Rule of 40 test (score of -2), keeping the quality score at 3.2, just below the 4.0 floor. Quality breakdown | Rule of 40 score should turn positive and free cash flow burn should narrow toward breakeven over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterNewly commercial medical device companies often run negative free cash flow while scaling salesforce and manufacturing, so a single period's burn rate doesn't necessarily indicate a structural quality problem. | ||
The stock is in a technical breakout -- above all major moving averages with a golden cross -- pushing the momentum score to 6.8, well above the engine's 5.5 threshold. Momentum breakdown | The stock should hold above its 200-day moving average and momentum score should stay above 5.5 over the next 2 quarters if the breakout is durable. | →Stable |
| CounterFalling on-balance volume during the breakout suggests the advance isn't backed by strong buying conviction, raising the odds of a failed breakout. | ||
Insiders sold $2,772,296 (0.374% of market cap) across 19 transactions in the past 90 days with zero buys, a heavy selling severity that failed the engine's insider gate. Insider | Insider selling should slow materially, dropping below 10 transactions per quarter, if this was a one-time liquidity event rather than a signal of eroding confidence. | →Stable |
| CounterBroad-based selling across many small transactions more likely reflects pre-scheduled selling plans (Rule 10b5-1) among a large employee base after a lockup expiration than a coordinated bearish signal. | ||
The company has beaten earnings estimates in all of its last 4 reported quarters, with an average surprise of 7.9%, a perfect beat streak the engine flags as a positive catalyst. Catalyst breakdown | The beat streak should extend through the next 2 reported quarters with average surprise staying positive. | →Stable |
| CounterA perfect beat streak against consistently conservative estimates for a small, newly-public device maker may just reflect management consistently under-promising and over-delivering rather than genuine outperformance. | ||
CounterNewly commercial medical device companies often run negative free cash flow while scaling salesforce and manufacturing, so a single period's burn rate doesn't necessarily indicate a structural quality problem.
CounterFalling on-balance volume during the breakout suggests the advance isn't backed by strong buying conviction, raising the odds of a failed breakout.
CounterBroad-based selling across many small transactions more likely reflects pre-scheduled selling plans (Rule 10b5-1) among a large employee base after a lockup expiration than a coordinated bearish signal.
CounterA perfect beat streak against consistently conservative estimates for a small, newly-public device maker may just reflect management consistently under-promising and over-delivering rather than genuine outperformance.
CeriBell shows a strong technical breakout, robust growth, and a perfect earnings beat streak, but cash burn keeps quality below the engine's floor and heavy insider selling has tripped the insider gate, arguing for caution despite the momentum.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 4.9 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 7.2 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 9.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 8.4 |
| OBV | 5.4 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.0 |
| quality rank | 0.8 |
| growth rank | 8.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.9 |
| support resistance | 4.0 |
| 52w position | 5.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.9 |
| days to cover | 3.2 |
| volatility | 1.5 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| debt equity | 9.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.4 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 62, MACD bullish
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 28d with 4/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.8B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 9.8 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.8, Catalyst at 6.6, and Value at 6.5; the weakest are Quality at 3.2, Risk (lower is worse) at 3.8, and Technical at 4.6. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.86 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRule of 40 score rises above 20.
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 5.5 while price closes below the 200-day moving average.
Trip ifNet insider selling exceeds $5,000,000 over the next 90 days.
Trip ifAverage earnings surprise falls below 0% in 2 of its next 4 reported quarters.