Value
5.9/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.7 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 26.4x
CAPL · Why this verdict
Why CrossAmerica Partners (CAPL) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The quality score of 3.5 sits just below the engine's 4.0 minimum floor, despite excellent cash conversion of 167% of free cash flow to net income, reflecting a lack of competitive moat as the key drag. Bear case | Quality score should climb above the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months given the already-strong cash conversion. | →Stable |
| CounterAs an MLP fuel distributor, the business model is inherently commodity-like with limited moat by nature, so this score may persistently sit near the floor regardless of near-term operational improvement. | ||
The company has beaten consensus estimates in all three of its last reported quarters, with an outsized average surprise driven by a low earnings base. Earnings | The beat streak should continue at the 2026-08-05 report. | →Stable |
| CounterExtremely large percentage surprises, over 100%, usually reflect a very small estimate base rather than genuine outperformance, making the streak less meaningful than it appears. | ||
The engine flags a yield-trap warning, indicating the distribution yield may be unsustainably high relative to underlying cash flow and business quality. Catalyst breakdown | The distribution should be maintained without a cut, and the yield-trap flag should clear over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterMLP distributions are frequently maintained even through periods of relatively weaker underlying quality due to contractual and tax-driven payout policies, so the flag alone doesn't guarantee a cut. | ||
The stock is in a technical breakout, a golden cross with price above all major moving averages, RSI at 52, and bullish MACD, even though the engine's asymmetry gate shows fully exhausted upside. Chart pattern detection | Price should extend and hold the breakout over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterWith modeled upside already at 0% per the asymmetry gate, this breakout may already be fully priced in, leaving little room for further technical gains. | ||
The quality score of 3.5 sits just below the engine's 4.0 minimum floor, despite excellent cash conversion of 167% of free cash flow to net income, reflecting a lack of competitive moat as the key drag.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Quality score should climb above the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months given the already-strong cash conversion.
CounterAs an MLP fuel distributor, the business model is inherently commodity-like with limited moat by nature, so this score may persistently sit near the floor regardless of near-term operational improvement.
The company has beaten consensus estimates in all three of its last reported quarters, with an outsized average surprise driven by a low earnings base.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The beat streak should continue at the 2026-08-05 report.
CounterExtremely large percentage surprises, over 100%, usually reflect a very small estimate base rather than genuine outperformance, making the streak less meaningful than it appears.
The engine flags a yield-trap warning, indicating the distribution yield may be unsustainably high relative to underlying cash flow and business quality.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- The distribution should be maintained without a cut, and the yield-trap flag should clear over the next 12 months.
CounterMLP distributions are frequently maintained even through periods of relatively weaker underlying quality due to contractual and tax-driven payout policies, so the flag alone doesn't guarantee a cut.
The stock is in a technical breakout, a golden cross with price above all major moving averages, RSI at 52, and bullish MACD, even though the engine's asymmetry gate shows fully exhausted upside.
→StableChart pattern detection
- Expectation
- Price should extend and hold the breakout over the next 12 months.
CounterWith modeled upside already at 0% per the asymmetry gate, this breakout may already be fully priced in, leaving little room for further technical gains.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
CAPL sits just below the engine's quality floor despite strong cash conversion and a technical breakout, with a flagged yield-trap warning the central risk to the distribution thesis.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 3.6 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.0 |
| Net margin | 0.9 |
| Current ratio | 3.0 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 3.8 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 167% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
2.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -2%
Momentum
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 7.5 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.3 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
5.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
7.5/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
3.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.8 |
| quality rank | 4.4 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
Technical
4.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.7 |
| support resistance | 1.2 |
| 52w position | 9.4 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.9 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 7.0 |
| put call | 5.0 |
| implied vol | 5.4 |
| beta | 10.0 |
- ▸Concentration risks: 4 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 2.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.6>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:29d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (1)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
6.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 64, MACD bullish
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 29d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.9B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Risk (lower is worse) at 7.9 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.9, Insider at 7.5, and Momentum at 6.6; the weakest are Growth at 2.0, Quality at 3.5, and Peer rank at 3.8. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Near Quality Floor
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Earnings Beat Streak
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% (a miss) in the next reported quarter.
- P3Yield Trap Warning
Trip ifThe distribution per unit is cut by more than 10% within the next 12 months.
- P4Breakout Technical Setup
Trip ifStock price falls below its 200-day moving average by more than 5%.