Value
8.9/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 6.0x
- ▸PEG: 0.06
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Caleres already trades essentially at its analyst target and carries quality metrics below the engine's floor, with a red-flag cash-flow read and a bearish insider signal offsetting cheap headline valuation and improving momentum.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The stock has already reached its analyst target, trading about 0.3% above it per the engine's v9 upside read of -0.3%, leaving little room for further multiple expansion. Bear case | Upside_pct should turn positive again if the stock pulls back or the analyst target is raised, restoring room to the target. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterWith a $0.5B market cap outside institutional reach, price often overshoots or undershoots analyst targets by wide margins, so being at the target now says little about the next 12 months. | ||
Business quality scores 2.6, below the engine's 4.0 minimum floor, driven by a red-flag earnings-quality metric of -487% FCF/NI despite a strong Piotroski score of 7 out of 9. Quality breakdown | FCF/NI should turn positive and stabilize, lifting the quality score back above 4.0. | →Stable |
| CounterA deeply negative FCF/NI ratio can reflect structural working-capital or margin problems that persist well beyond a single reporting cycle. | ||
Shares are technically overbought with an RSI of 73 even as the 200-day moving-average slope has gone flat, raising the risk of a momentum fade. Momentum breakdown | RSI should cool toward the 50-60 range while the stock holds its position above the 200-day moving average. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterRising on-balance volume shows real accumulation, so the overbought reading could resolve through continued upside rather than a pullback. | ||
The engine flags a yield trap -- the dividend appears high but unsafe -- alongside two earnings misses in the last four quarters. Catalyst breakdown | Earnings should return to a beat streak and the yield-trap flag should clear as dividend safety improves. | →Stable |
| CounterTwo of the last four quarters already missed estimates, and a yield-trap flag often precedes an actual dividend cut rather than a false alarm. | ||
Insider signal reads bearish with net insider selling of roughly 11,207 shares, while the options market shows an elevated put/call ratio of 1.78 and 70% implied volatility. Insider | Insider signal should flip to neutral or bullish, and the put/call ratio should compress below 1.0. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe insider sale here is a small share-count move with no dollar value reported, so it may not be a meaningful signal despite the bearish label. | ||
CounterWith a $0.5B market cap outside institutional reach, price often overshoots or undershoots analyst targets by wide margins, so being at the target now says little about the next 12 months.
CounterA deeply negative FCF/NI ratio can reflect structural working-capital or margin problems that persist well beyond a single reporting cycle.
CounterRising on-balance volume shows real accumulation, so the overbought reading could resolve through continued upside rather than a pullback.
CounterTwo of the last four quarters already missed estimates, and a yield-trap flag often precedes an actual dividend cut rather than a false alarm.
CounterThe insider sale here is a small share-count move with no dollar value reported, so it may not be a meaningful signal despite the bearish label.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 1.2 |
| Gross margin | 4.8 |
| Op margin | 1.3 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.1 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.4 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.6 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 1.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 3.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| holder change | 7.6 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.3 |
| quality rank | 0.6 |
| growth rank | 4.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.0 |
| support resistance | 5.9 |
| 52w position | 6.3 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.9 |
| days to cover | 1.3 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.7 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 8.4 |
| debt equity | 3.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 1.9 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 3.1<4.5 outcome against Value at 8.9 and asymmetric R:R of 1.08.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.9, Growth at 7.3, and Insider at 6.4; the weakest are Risk (lower is worse) at 2.6, Quality at 2.6, and Momentum at 3.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.08 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifUpside_pct rises above 15% from the current -0.3%, meaning shares fall well below the analyst target again.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from the current 2.6, clearing the engine's minimum floor.
Trip ifShares rise more than 10% over the next quarter while RSI stays above 70, showing no overbought pullback materializes.
Trip ifThe company beats consensus EPS in 2 consecutive quarters, and dividend safety score rises above 8.0 from the current 6.0.
Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 1.0 from the current 1.78, and implied volatility compresses below 40% from 70%.