Skip to main content
CACICACI International, Inc.Sell5.7·$674.37
CACI · Why this verdict

Why CACI International (CACI) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Four consecutive quarters of earnings beats averaging approximately 12% above consensus, a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 16.2x, and a risk/reward ratio of 2.3-to-1 make this an attractively valued government technology franchise; the primary near-term risk is momentum weakness alongside elevated options hedging demand, offset by the observation that the 200-day trend line remains intact and rising.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

At a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 16.2x and a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.92, the stock screens attractively valued, and analyst consensus implies roughly 16% headroom to the price target from current levels.

↓Deteriorating
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The share price closes within 5% of the $588 analyst consensus target within 12 months as the valuation discount narrows.

CounterThe apparent valuation discount depends on federal spending remaining stable; if government budget pressure or a continuing resolution weighs on contract revenues and prompts estimate cuts, the 16.2x multiple could compress and the upside gap could shrink or disappear.

With approximately 95.7% of revenue drawn from the federal government and 75.4% tied specifically to the Department of Defense, the company is highly exposed to defense budget cycles, continuing resolutions, and shifts in government spending priorities entirely outside its control.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
Federal revenue concentration declines below 90% of total revenue over the next 12 months, indicating early progress toward customer diversification.

CounterLong-term government IT services contracts tend to be highly sticky, and deep federal specialization can be a structural competitive advantage in a market where agencies pay a premium for proven cleared contractors — making concentration a durable strength rather than a latent liability.

The company has beaten analyst estimates in each of the four most recent quarters, with the average upside surprise running at approximately 12% — a pattern consistent with disciplined guidance setting rather than episodic outperformance.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
The earnings beat streak extends through at least two more quarters, with quarterly EPS surprises remaining above 0%.

CounterThe two most recent quarterly beats registered just 4.95% and 4.75% above consensus, well below the 11% and 28% surprises seen in the two earlier periods, suggesting the margin of outperformance has narrowed materially and the streak may be approaching its natural limits.

The stock is trading below its 200-day moving average with falling on-balance volume, but the moving average itself is still trending upward at approximately 0.7% per month, suggesting the current weakness has not confirmed a breakdown and may represent a pullback within an ongoing longer-term uptrend.

↑Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
The share price recrosses its 200-day moving average within two quarters and on-balance volume shifts from distribution to net accumulation.

CounterA put/call ratio of 2.90 indicates the options market is positioning for significant additional downside; if institutional hedging demand persists and the 200-day average slope eventually turns negative, the pullback-in-uptrend interpretation would be invalidated.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.6
P/S9.3
EV/EBITDA2.4
Fwd P/E7.1
PEG7.0
Analyst target4.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 17.6x
  • ▸PEG: 1.00

Quality

5.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.2
ROA3.9
Gross margin2.8
Op margin4.0
Net margin2.8
Current ratio5.8
FCF quality7.7
Moat4.8
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

3.6/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.5
EPS growth2.7

Momentum

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.1
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume2.5
  • ▸Overbought (RSI 79)
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

8.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment8.5
Analyst rating8.6
Price target6.6
  • ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.70 (n=1)

Insider

7.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

4.4/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank3.1
quality rank4.7
growth rank6.0

Technical

3.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.0
support resistance0.8
52w position9.7

Risk (lower is worse)

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.4
days to cover6.2
volatility5.0
put call9.7
implied vol6.8
beta9.5
debt equity4.7
news risk6.0
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg8.7
news activity5.0
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:7.1>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:82d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.0=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.02
Upside
-0.3%
Downside
14.7%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Sentiment at 8.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.0=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.02 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 8.0, Insider at 7.3, and Momentum at 7.1; the weakest are Technical at 3.5, Growth at 3.6, and Peer rank at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.02 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Consistent Earnings Beat Streak

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Attractively Valued Material Upside

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls to or below $507.56 (current price), eliminating all analyst-derived upside.

  • P3Federal Concentration Spending Risk

    Trip ifFederal government revenue concentration falls below 85% of total revenue for 2 consecutive fiscal reporting periods.

  • P4Momentum Overhang Intact Uptrend

    Trip ifThe 200-day moving average slope turns negative while the share price remains below it for 3 consecutive months.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › CACI › Why this verdict