Value
8.1/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.8 |
| PEG | 8.7 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.72
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Brunswick is cheaply valued (forward P/E 12.2x, PEG 0.72) with a perfect four-quarter earnings beat streak and 22.9% upside to the analyst target, but quality scores 2.6/10 with no competitive moat and sole-source supplier exposure.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Business quality is poor, scoring 2.6/10 with no competitive moat, which caps how much valuation upside can be trusted. Quality breakdown | Quality score improves above 4.0 as margins and returns recover over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterPeer-relative quality ranks at the bottom (1.0 of 10) and operating margin and ROE components score near zero, so a recovery may not arrive in 12 months. | ||
The company has beaten EPS estimates in all four recent quarters, with an average surprise of 24.7%, most recently 31% in July 2026. Earnings | EPS surprise stays positive in the report due in 5 days and the following quarters. | ↑Improving |
| CounterBeats came off low estimates (for example $0.45 expected in April), and cyclical recreational demand could reverse the streak. | ||
Brunswick looks attractively valued at a forward P/E of 12.2x and a PEG of 0.72. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E stays at or below roughly 14x as earnings growth is delivered. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterA low multiple on a business with no moat and weak margins may be a value trap, and forward earnings estimates could be cut. | ||
The price of $65.88 sits 22.9% below the $80.94 analyst target, giving a reward-to-risk of 3.2 against a 7.1% downside to the stop. Upside pct | Price closes a meaningful part of the gap to the $80.94 target within 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterAnalyst targets for cyclical consumer names often lag deteriorating demand, and the engine still recommends avoiding the position. | ||
Rising on-balance volume signals accumulation even though price is below its 200-day average in a confirmed downtrend, a recovery setup with momentum at 6.6/10. Momentum breakdown | Price reclaims its 200-day average and the momentum score holds above 5.5. | ↑Improving |
| CounterA death cross is in place and the 200-day average slope is -1.3% over 30 days, so the rebound may be a bounce inside a downtrend. | ||
CounterPeer-relative quality ranks at the bottom (1.0 of 10) and operating margin and ROE components score near zero, so a recovery may not arrive in 12 months.
CounterBeats came off low estimates (for example $0.45 expected in April), and cyclical recreational demand could reverse the streak.
CounterA low multiple on a business with no moat and weak margins may be a value trap, and forward earnings estimates could be cut.
CounterAnalyst targets for cyclical consumer names often lag deteriorating demand, and the engine still recommends avoiding the position.
CounterA death cross is in place and the 200-day average slope is -1.3% over 30 days, so the rebound may be a bounce inside a downtrend.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.8 |
| PEG | 8.7 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 2.3 |
| Gross margin | 1.2 |
| Op margin | 2.7 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.3 |
| Moat | 3.6 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.4 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.2 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.8 |
| Analyst rating | 7.3 |
| Price target | 8.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.0 |
| quality rank | 1.0 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.1 |
| support resistance | 0.2 |
| 52w position | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 4.6 |
| put call | 1.5 |
| implied vol | 5.8 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 5.5 |
| debt equity | 4.3 |
| news risk | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.8 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORnone
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 68
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.38>1.3, MCap $4.5B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects clean gate clearance against Value at 8.1 and asymmetric R:R of 1.49.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.1, Catalyst at 7.8, and Growth at 7.2; the weakest are Technical at 1.9, Peer rank at 2.6, and Quality at 2.6. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.49 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifQuality score stays below 2.0 from the current 2.6 for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 16x from the current 12.2x.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifAnalyst target falls below $70 from the current $80.94.
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 5.0 from the current 6.6.