Value
6.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.2 |
| P/S | 9.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 1.6 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 66.7x
BA · Why this verdict
Why Boeing Company (The) (BA) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Boeing presents a recovery trajectory — three of four recent quarters beat estimates and the risk/reward geometry offers about 12.5% headroom to the analyst consensus — but business quality remains below the minimum threshold, revenue is contracting, and price momentum is severely negative, making the setup one to monitor rather than act on.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Business quality sits below the minimum threshold of 4.0, with operating margins near zero and return on assets at the floor, indicating that core profitability has not yet recovered to a level consistent with a defensible investment. Bear case | Quality metrics — particularly operating margin and return on assets — improve such that the overall quality reading rises above 4.0 within 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterGeographic revenue concentration with approximately 60% of commercial aviation revenue from outside the U.S. and sole-source supplier dependency compound the quality shortfall; these structural risks may suppress quality even if margins recover modestly. | ||
After a severe earnings miss in October 2025 that produced a -214% surprise, the company delivered back-to-back beats in the two most recent quarters, including a 70% positive surprise in April 2026, suggesting the operational trajectory is improving. Earnings | Continued positive earnings surprises over the next two to three quarters as the recovery trajectory firms up. | →Stable |
| CounterThe October 2025 quarter produced a -214% earnings surprise, revealing how quickly estimates can prove too optimistic; a two-quarter streak does not confirm a durable recovery pattern, and a single negative surprise could reset sentiment sharply. | ||
Revenue has been declining at -6.5% year-over-year alongside a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.7, a combination that signals a potential value trap until operations stabilize. Warnings | Revenue growth turns positive year-over-year and the leverage ratio begins to narrow over a 12-month horizon. | ↑Improving |
| CounterHigh leverage leaves less financial cushion if revenue contraction continues; the combination of declining revenue and elevated debt can persist for extended periods if operational disruptions recur. | ||
Price momentum is severely negative — below the 200-day moving average with falling volume distribution — and the breach of the long-term average is described as recent and shallow, too early to call a directional verdict. Momentum breakdown | Momentum reverses as price reclaims the 200-day moving average and volume distribution shifts from distribution to accumulation. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterFalling on-balance volume alongside a below-average price position can persist for extended periods; the current technical setup provides no confirming signal that a bottom has formed. | ||
Despite quality and momentum headwinds, the risk/reward geometry is favorable at approximately 2.2-to-1 with about 12.5% headroom to the analyst consensus target of $243. Price targets | Price advances toward the $243 analyst consensus target as operational improvements are recognized over the next 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterTwo high-severity and three medium-severity concentration risks per the 10-K annual filing, combined with no identified technical edge, mean the favorable ratio may remain uncaptured if execution setbacks resurface. | ||
Business quality sits below the minimum threshold of 4.0, with operating margins near zero and return on assets at the floor, indicating that core profitability has not yet recovered to a level consistent with a defensible investment.
↑ImprovingBear case
- Expectation
- Quality metrics — particularly operating margin and return on assets — improve such that the overall quality reading rises above 4.0 within 12 months.
CounterGeographic revenue concentration with approximately 60% of commercial aviation revenue from outside the U.S. and sole-source supplier dependency compound the quality shortfall; these structural risks may suppress quality even if margins recover modestly.
After a severe earnings miss in October 2025 that produced a -214% surprise, the company delivered back-to-back beats in the two most recent quarters, including a 70% positive surprise in April 2026, suggesting the operational trajectory is improving.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Continued positive earnings surprises over the next two to three quarters as the recovery trajectory firms up.
CounterThe October 2025 quarter produced a -214% earnings surprise, revealing how quickly estimates can prove too optimistic; a two-quarter streak does not confirm a durable recovery pattern, and a single negative surprise could reset sentiment sharply.
Revenue has been declining at -6.5% year-over-year alongside a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.7, a combination that signals a potential value trap until operations stabilize.
↑ImprovingWarnings
- Expectation
- Revenue growth turns positive year-over-year and the leverage ratio begins to narrow over a 12-month horizon.
CounterHigh leverage leaves less financial cushion if revenue contraction continues; the combination of declining revenue and elevated debt can persist for extended periods if operational disruptions recur.
Price momentum is severely negative — below the 200-day moving average with falling volume distribution — and the breach of the long-term average is described as recent and shallow, too early to call a directional verdict.
↓DeterioratingMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- Momentum reverses as price reclaims the 200-day moving average and volume distribution shifts from distribution to accumulation.
CounterFalling on-balance volume alongside a below-average price position can persist for extended periods; the current technical setup provides no confirming signal that a bottom has formed.
Despite quality and momentum headwinds, the risk/reward geometry is favorable at approximately 2.2-to-1 with about 12.5% headroom to the analyst consensus target of $243.
↑ImprovingPrice targets
- Expectation
- Price advances toward the $243 analyst consensus target as operational improvements are recognized over the next 12 months.
CounterTwo high-severity and three medium-severity concentration risks per the 10-K annual filing, combined with no identified technical edge, mean the favorable ratio may remain uncaptured if execution setbacks resurface.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.1 |
| Net margin | 4.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.4 |
| FCF quality | 4.8 |
| Moat | 3.9 |
| Piotroski F | 3.3 |
- ▸Earnings quality warning: 62% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 3/9
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
3.5/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.5 |
Momentum
1.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 2.6 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -1.9%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.5 |
| Analyst rating | 9.0 |
| Price target | 9.1 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 38%
Insider
6.2/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 6.5 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.8 |
| quality rank | 5.9 |
| growth rank | 0.3 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
Technical
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.2 |
| support resistance | 7.8 |
| 52w position | 3.5 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 4.1 |
| put call | 5.4 |
| implied vol | 6.5 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 6.0 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
- ▸Above max pain $130
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 3 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORPassed (7)
- ASYMMETRY:3.6>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:86d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:1.6<4.5
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
3.64
Upside
+24.6%
Downside
6.7%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupFalling Knife — Death cross, below all MAs, RSI 31, MACD bearish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 1.6<4.5 outcome against Sentiment at 7.2 and asymmetric R:R of 3.64.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 7.2, Technical at 6.8, and Catalyst at 6.3; the weakest are Momentum at 1.6, Quality at 2.6, and Growth at 3.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.64 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Recent Earnings Beat Improvement
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Revenue Decline Leverage Headwind
Trip ifRevenue growth exceeds 0% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Quality Below Minimum Floor
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive assessment periods.
- P4Momentum Deeply Negative
Trip ifPrice breaks above the 200-day moving average and stays above for 20 consecutive trading days.
- P5Favorable Upside Asymmetry
Trip ifReward-to-risk ratio falls below 1.5 for 2 consecutive assessment periods.