Value
8.4/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.1 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.01
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
AdvanSix's quality score of 2.1 sits below the engine's 4.0 floor, driven by a red-flagged FCF-to-net-income ratio of -216% despite a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9. Quality breakdown | The quality score improves toward the 4.0 floor as free cash flow conversion recovers from the current -216% of net income. | →Stable |
| CounterA strong 7-of-9 Piotroski F-Score suggests underlying balance-sheet and profitability trends are actually improving, which could pull the composite quality score up even if the FCF/NI ratio stays depressed. | ||
AdvanSix trades at a 6.9x forward P/E with a 0.01 PEG, which the value model flags as attractively valued. Valuation breakdown | The value score, currently 8.5, holds as the multiple stays cheap relative to peers. | →Stable |
| CounterThe V8 layer already flags the analyst target as reached with -1.6% upside, meaning the cheap multiple may not translate into further price appreciation from current levels. | ||
The catalyst notes flag a yield-trap warning, indicating the dividend yield looks high but is considered unsafe given the underlying dividend-safety score of 4.2. Catalyst breakdown | The dividend-safety score improves above the current 4.2 level, or the payout is cut before it becomes a larger problem. | →Stable |
| CounterA dividend-safety score of 4.2 is a model estimate; the company could maintain the payout if chemical-cycle earnings recover faster than the model currently assumes. | ||
The V9 asymmetry gate failed at -0.18, and the V8 layer separately flags the analyst target as already reached with -1.6% implied upside. Warnings | The risk/reward profile turns positive as either the price pulls back to a better entry or the analyst target is revised higher. | →Stable |
| CounterA mixed earnings record of 2 beats and 2 misses over the last 4 quarters means the next print could easily surprise to the upside and shift sentiment. | ||
Short interest sits at a high level with implied volatility at 72%, both flagged in the risk model as elevated for a chemicals name. Risk breakdown | Short interest and implied volatility decline as the range-bound setup resolves into a clearer trend. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh short interest combined with a range-bound setup can instead set up a short squeeze if the stock breaks out to the upside, which would work against the bearish risk read. | ||
CounterA strong 7-of-9 Piotroski F-Score suggests underlying balance-sheet and profitability trends are actually improving, which could pull the composite quality score up even if the FCF/NI ratio stays depressed.
CounterThe V8 layer already flags the analyst target as reached with -1.6% upside, meaning the cheap multiple may not translate into further price appreciation from current levels.
CounterA dividend-safety score of 4.2 is a model estimate; the company could maintain the payout if chemical-cycle earnings recover faster than the model currently assumes.
CounterA mixed earnings record of 2 beats and 2 misses over the last 4 quarters means the next print could easily surprise to the upside and shift sentiment.
CounterHigh short interest combined with a range-bound setup can instead set up a short squeeze if the stock breaks out to the upside, which would work against the bearish risk read.
AdvanSix trades at a cheap multiple with a strong balance-sheet score, but weak free-cash-flow conversion keeps quality below the engine's floor, and a yield-trap warning plus a failed asymmetry gate temper the near-term risk/reward.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.1 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4 |
| ROA | 0.9 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.3 |
| Current ratio | 4.7 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 8.3 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 1.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 9.9 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.7 |
| quality rank | 6.9 |
| growth rank | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.2 |
| support resistance | 6.0 |
| 52w position | 5.4 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.8 |
| days to cover | 7.9 |
| volatility | 3.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.1 |
| beta | 5.8 |
| debt equity | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 3.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 43 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.6B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.30>1.3, MCap $0.6B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 8.4 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-0.3=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.4, Insider at 7.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.2; the weakest are Quality at 2.1, Growth at 4.2, and Catalyst at 5.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.32 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFCF-to-net-income ratio stays below -100% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 12x from the current 6.9x.
Trip ifDividend-safety score falls below 3.0 from the current 4.2, or the dividend is cut.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio falls below -1.0, down from the current -0.18.
Trip ifImplied volatility falls below 40% from the current 72%, or short interest falls below 5%.