Value
8.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 8.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.2 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 10.5x
- ▸PEG: 0.03
- ▸Attractively valued
APPS · Why this verdict
Why Digital Turbine (APPS) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.5/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The stock trades at a steep valuation discount, with a forward P/E near 12x and an extremely low PEG ratio of 0.03, screening as statistically cheap relative to its earnings growth. Valuation breakdown | The valuation discount should narrow over the next 12 months as the multiple re-rates, assuming earnings growth continues. | →Stable |
| CounterHaving already fallen well below its prior analyst target and with quality below the required floor, the cheap multiple may reflect a genuinely impaired business rather than a bargain. | ||
The company shows value-trap warning signs, including negative operating margins and extreme leverage near 48.8x debt-to-equity. Bear case | Operating margins should move toward breakeven and leverage should decline meaningfully over the next 12 months for the value-trap concern to ease. | →Stable |
| CounterThe business is already free-cash-flow positive, which could allow it to manage the debt load and improve margins without needing an immediate structural fix. | ||
Business quality sits below the minimum threshold required for a position, with no clear competitive moat and only moderate free cash flow margins. Bear case | The quality score should recover above the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months as margins and competitive positioning improve. | →Stable |
| CounterThe company already generates positive free cash flow, which could support gradual quality improvement even without a fundamental change to the business model. | ||
Forward estimates have been revised higher, up roughly 6% over the past month, and recent earnings execution has been strong with three beats against one miss over the last four quarters. Catalyst breakdown | Estimate revisions should remain net positive and the beat rate should hold at 75% or better over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe stock still trades below its analyst target despite strong headline execution, suggesting the market is discounting the estimate revisions due to broader quality and leverage concerns. | ||
Options and short positioning skew defensive, with short interest near 10% of float and a put/call ratio of 1.45, indicating meaningful bearish hedging activity. Key risks | Short interest and the put/call ratio should decline toward more neutral levels over the next 12 months if fundamental concerns ease. | →Stable |
| CounterElevated short interest combined with rising forward estimates could set up a short-covering rally if results continue to beat, independent of the underlying quality concerns. | ||
The stock trades at a steep valuation discount, with a forward P/E near 12x and an extremely low PEG ratio of 0.03, screening as statistically cheap relative to its earnings growth.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- The valuation discount should narrow over the next 12 months as the multiple re-rates, assuming earnings growth continues.
CounterHaving already fallen well below its prior analyst target and with quality below the required floor, the cheap multiple may reflect a genuinely impaired business rather than a bargain.
The company shows value-trap warning signs, including negative operating margins and extreme leverage near 48.8x debt-to-equity.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Operating margins should move toward breakeven and leverage should decline meaningfully over the next 12 months for the value-trap concern to ease.
CounterThe business is already free-cash-flow positive, which could allow it to manage the debt load and improve margins without needing an immediate structural fix.
Business quality sits below the minimum threshold required for a position, with no clear competitive moat and only moderate free cash flow margins.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- The quality score should recover above the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months as margins and competitive positioning improve.
CounterThe company already generates positive free cash flow, which could support gradual quality improvement even without a fundamental change to the business model.
Forward estimates have been revised higher, up roughly 6% over the past month, and recent earnings execution has been strong with three beats against one miss over the last four quarters.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- Estimate revisions should remain net positive and the beat rate should hold at 75% or better over the next 12 months.
CounterThe stock still trades below its analyst target despite strong headline execution, suggesting the market is discounting the estimate revisions due to broader quality and leverage concerns.
Options and short positioning skew defensive, with short interest near 10% of float and a put/call ratio of 1.45, indicating meaningful bearish hedging activity.
→StableKey risks
- Expectation
- Short interest and the put/call ratio should decline toward more neutral levels over the next 12 months if fundamental concerns ease.
CounterElevated short interest combined with rising forward estimates could set up a short-covering rally if results continue to beat, independent of the underlying quality concerns.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
APPS screens statistically cheap with rising forward estimates and a solid recent beat rate, but value-trap signals around leverage and margins, quality below the required floor, and defensive short and options positioning keep this a high-risk name.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 1.7 |
| Gross margin | 5.7 |
| Op margin | 3.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.5 |
| FCF quality | 3.9 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸FCF-positive but moderate margins (FCF margin 4%, FCF yield 1.8%)
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
7.4/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 7.4 |
Momentum
2.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.5 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 1.1 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
4.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 2.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Below analyst target
Insider
7.5/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
3.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.1 |
| quality rank | 1.4 |
| growth rank | 6.5 |
Technical
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.0 |
| support resistance | 5.8 |
| 52w position | 5.4 |
| gap | 7.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.9 |
| days to cover | 9.8 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 0.8 |
| debt equity | 3.2 |
- ▸High IV: 108%
- ▸Above max pain $1
Catalyst
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:28d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:2.8<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-1.9=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-1.94
Upside
-29.2%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 56 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 28d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 2.77>1.3, MCap $1.3B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 8.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.8<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.0, Insider at 7.5, and Growth at 7.4; the weakest are Momentum at 2.8, Quality at 3.4, and Peer rank at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.94 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Steep Valuation Discount
Trip ifForward P/E compresses below 8x.
- P2Value Trap Leverage Margins
Trip ifOperating margin improves to above 0% from the current -24.4%.
- P3Quality Below Required Floor
Trip ifQuality score exceeds 4.0 from the current 3.4.
- P4Rising Estimates Strong Execution
Trip ifForward earnings estimates are revised down by more than 15% over a 30-day period.
- P5Defensive Short Options Positioning
Trip ifShort interest falls below 5% of float.