Value
8.1/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.5 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.3 |
| PEG | 5.9 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 10.2x
- ▸PEG: 1.27
- ▸Attractively valued
APOG · Why this verdict
Why Apogee Enterprises (APOG) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company has beaten earnings estimates in all of the last four quarters and trades at an attractive valuation, with a forward P/E near 10.4x and a PEG of 1.32. Bull case | The beat streak should continue and the valuation discount should persist or narrow over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterWeak revenue growth undercuts the durability of the beat streak, since beats driven by cost control rather than top-line strength are harder to sustain indefinitely. | ||
Revenue growth is weak, declining roughly 1% year-over-year, a headwind to the broader investment case despite the attractive valuation. Bear case | Revenue growth should turn positive over the next 12 months, reversing the current year-over-year decline. | →Stable |
| CounterA building-products company facing softer construction demand may see revenue stay flat or decline further for an extended cyclical stretch rather than quickly reversing. | ||
Business quality lags, with no clear competitive moat identified despite strong cash conversion and a solid Piotroski score. Key risks | The quality score should improve toward a stronger level over the next 12 months as profitability and competitive positioning strengthen. | →Stable |
| CounterExcellent cash conversion at 150% of net income and a strong Piotroski score already suggest solid financial execution, so the moat gap may not meaningfully change the investment outcome. | ||
Price momentum has stalled just below the engine's minimum bar, with on-balance volume in a distribution pattern and the moving-average slope gone flat. Momentum breakdown | Momentum should reaccelerate over the next 12 months, with volume flows shifting back to accumulation and the moving-average slope turning positive. | →Stable |
| CounterFlat momentum paired with declining revenue could persist or worsen rather than reaccelerate if end-market demand stays soft. | ||
The stock has already reached its analyst price target, suggesting limited further upside from current levels absent a new catalyst. Bear case | A fresh catalyst, such as improving revenue trends or an analyst target increase, should be needed over the next 12 months to justify further gains. | →Stable |
| CounterLight analyst coverage means the current target may not reflect the latest beat streak and could still be raised meaningfully. | ||
The company has beaten earnings estimates in all of the last four quarters and trades at an attractive valuation, with a forward P/E near 10.4x and a PEG of 1.32.
→StableBull case
- Expectation
- The beat streak should continue and the valuation discount should persist or narrow over the next 12 months.
CounterWeak revenue growth undercuts the durability of the beat streak, since beats driven by cost control rather than top-line strength are harder to sustain indefinitely.
Revenue growth is weak, declining roughly 1% year-over-year, a headwind to the broader investment case despite the attractive valuation.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Revenue growth should turn positive over the next 12 months, reversing the current year-over-year decline.
CounterA building-products company facing softer construction demand may see revenue stay flat or decline further for an extended cyclical stretch rather than quickly reversing.
Business quality lags, with no clear competitive moat identified despite strong cash conversion and a solid Piotroski score.
→StableKey risks
- Expectation
- The quality score should improve toward a stronger level over the next 12 months as profitability and competitive positioning strengthen.
CounterExcellent cash conversion at 150% of net income and a strong Piotroski score already suggest solid financial execution, so the moat gap may not meaningfully change the investment outcome.
Price momentum has stalled just below the engine's minimum bar, with on-balance volume in a distribution pattern and the moving-average slope gone flat.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- Momentum should reaccelerate over the next 12 months, with volume flows shifting back to accumulation and the moving-average slope turning positive.
CounterFlat momentum paired with declining revenue could persist or worsen rather than reaccelerate if end-market demand stays soft.
The stock has already reached its analyst price target, suggesting limited further upside from current levels absent a new catalyst.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- A fresh catalyst, such as improving revenue trends or an analyst target increase, should be needed over the next 12 months to justify further gains.
CounterLight analyst coverage means the current target may not reflect the latest beat streak and could still be raised meaningfully.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
APOG combines a perfect four-quarter earnings beat streak with an attractive valuation, but declining revenue, a lagging quality profile, and stalled momentum after already reaching its price target keep the setup mixed.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 4.6 |
| ROA | 4.2 |
| Gross margin | 0.7 |
| Op margin | 2.2 |
| Net margin | 2.4 |
| Current ratio | 6.3 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.4 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 150% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
2.2/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.2 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -1%
Momentum
1.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 3.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat
Sentiment
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.4 |
| Price target | 7.1 |
| erm sentiment | 1.9 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (2.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Estimates falling as sentiment proxy (-7.7%)
Insider
7.5/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
5.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.4 |
| quality rank | 4.6 |
| growth rank | 2.3 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
Technical
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.8 |
| support resistance | 9.4 |
| 52w position | 5.0 |
| gap | 6.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.2 |
| days to cover | 7.8 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.8 |
| beta | 6.5 |
| debt equity | 7.6 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 2.25
- ▸High IV: 76%
Catalyst
7.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 1.5 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 9.0 |
- ▸Estimates down -7.7% (30d)
- ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (5)
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:92d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:1.9<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.16
Upside
-2.2%
Downside
13.5%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.8B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.8B<$5B
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 8.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:1.9<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.16 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.1, Insider at 7.5, and Catalyst at 7.1; the weakest are Momentum at 1.9, Growth at 2.2, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.16 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Beat Streak Attractive Valuation
Trip ifEarnings surprise turns negative in at least 1 of the next 4 reported quarters.
- P2Declining Revenue Growth
Trip ifRevenue growth turns positive, exceeding 3% YoY.
- P3No Competitive Moat
Trip ifQuality score rises above 6.5 from the current 4.7.
- P4Stalled Momentum Distribution
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 6.5 from the current 4.2.
- P5Limited Upside At Target
Trip ifShares rise more than 15% above the current analyst price target.