Value
9.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The setup cleared both the momentum gate at 6.8 and the asymmetry gate at a reward-to-risk ratio of 3.76, with an 80% analyst-target upside against just 7.0% downside to stop. Reward-to-risk math | Momentum should stay above the gate's 5.5 threshold and the reward-to-risk ratio should remain above 1.5 over the next 12 months for the favorable setup to hold. | →Stable |
| CounterQuality remains a core concern, with a score of 2.1 sitting well below the 4.0 floor, which caps position sizing at avoid regardless of the favorable asymmetry. | ||
The quality score of 2.1 remains below the 4.0 floor cited as grounds to exit, driven by a weak Piotroski F-score of 3 out of 9, no competitive moat, and cash-burning free cash flow. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-score should climb out of the bottom quartile and free cash flow should move toward breakeven over the next 12 months for the exit signal to reverse. | →Stable |
| CounterThe current ratio component reads a strong 9.0, indicating substantial near-term liquidity to fund continued operations despite the cash burn. | ||
Insiders sold $1,359,000 over the past 90 days with zero offsetting buys, a level the engine flags as moderate relative to market cap and enough to trigger a bearish insider signal. Insider | Insider transactions should shift back toward net buying, or at least stop showing net selling, over the next 12 months for the bearish insider signal to ease. | →Stable |
| CounterPosition-sizing factors do not list the insider selling as a standalone cut factor, only the speculative cap, suggesting the engine does not weigh this selling as severely as the quality concern. | ||
Revenue growth of 37% year-over-year drives a growth score of 10.0, and sentiment notes cite an 80% analyst-target upside, even though coverage is explicitly described as light. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should remain in the double digits and analyst coverage should broaden over the next 12 months for the growth-and-upside case to be reliable. | →Stable |
| CounterLight analyst coverage explicitly dampens the reliability of the sentiment signal feeding that 80% upside figure. | ||
The trailing four quarters show two beats, one miss, and one in-line result, leaving the average surprise barely positive at 0.2% heading into the next report in 33 days. Earnings | The average surprise should climb meaningfully above the current near-zero level over the next reported quarter for earnings execution to be considered strengthening. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter was a beat of 4.93%, the second consecutive positive surprise following the prior in-line result, which could mark a modest improving trend. | ||
CounterQuality remains a core concern, with a score of 2.1 sitting well below the 4.0 floor, which caps position sizing at avoid regardless of the favorable asymmetry.
CounterThe current ratio component reads a strong 9.0, indicating substantial near-term liquidity to fund continued operations despite the cash burn.
CounterPosition-sizing factors do not list the insider selling as a standalone cut factor, only the speculative cap, suggesting the engine does not weigh this selling as severely as the quality concern.
CounterLight analyst coverage explicitly dampens the reliability of the sentiment signal feeding that 80% upside figure.
CounterThe most recent quarter was a beat of 4.93%, the second consecutive positive surprise following the prior in-line result, which could mark a modest improving trend.
Aclaris Therapeutics shows a favorable technical setup with strong momentum, a wide analyst-target upside, and double-digit revenue growth, but quality sits below the exit threshold and insiders have been notable net sellers, keeping the position capped at avoid.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.9 |
| MACD | 8.2 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 8.2 |
| Price target | 9.9 |
| erm sentiment | 4.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.1 |
| quality rank | 3.0 |
| growth rank | 6.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.7 |
| support resistance | 1.5 |
| 52w position | 9.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.4 |
| days to cover | 2.4 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 8.5 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 8.4 |
| debt equity | 9.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 5.6 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.4 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.8B) below institutional reach
SuitabilitySpeculative — Binary industry: Biotechnology
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Value at 9.0, and Sentiment at 7.8; the weakest are Quality at 2.4, Technical at 4.1, and Peer rank at 4.3. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.86 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifReward-to-risk ratio falls below 1.5 from the current 3.76.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from the current 2.1.
Trip ifNet insider selling falls below $500,000, or turns net-buy, over the next 2 quarters.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% YoY from the current 37%.
Trip ifAverage earnings surprise falls below -10% in the next reported quarter.