Value
8.8/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.5 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 6.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.50
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Asbury Automotive trades at a compelling 6.7 times forward earnings with a PEG below 1, but the thesis is constrained by a confirmed price downtrend, quality metrics below the minimum acceptable threshold, and a recent C-suite transition that adds execution uncertainty at a cyclically sensitive juncture.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The stock trades at 6.7 times forward earnings with a PEG ratio of 0.57, making it attractively valued against both its own history and sector peers; this multiple compression creates a potential re-rating opportunity if earnings stabilize. Valuation breakdown | Stock price advances toward the $202 price target as the valuation discount narrows over the next 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterA low multiple in a thin-margin, no-moat auto dealership may simply reflect structural earnings risk; with revenue declining 1% and quality metrics below the minimum threshold, the discount may persist or widen rather than close. | ||
Business quality metrics remain below the minimum acceptable threshold — no competitive moat and thin margins — leaving the earnings base exposed to cyclical downturns without a quality buffer to absorb them. Warnings | Quality metrics recover above the minimum threshold of 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters, removing the floor violation. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterAt 6.7 times forward earnings, the market has already priced in significant quality concerns; even modest stabilization in margins could trigger a re-rating without requiring a fundamental business transformation. | ||
The stock trades below its 200-day moving average with the long-term average sloping down at -2.8% per month, a configuration the technical data characterizes as a confirmed downtrend; price is unlikely to sustain an advance until the long-term trend stabilizes. Momentum breakdown | Stock price reclaims and holds above the 200-day moving average, confirming a trend reversal over the next 2 quarters. | ↑Improving |
| CounterMACD is improving and volume accumulation is rising, suggesting buyers are stepping in at current levels; if these shorter-term signals prove durable, the recovery may be closer than the long-term average implies. | ||
A recent officer departure and appointment has been flagged in a regulatory filing; at a cyclically sensitive consumer business where operational execution matters, management transitions introduce near-term uncertainty around strategy and continuity. Gates warning | Two consecutive quarters of positive EPS surprises following the transition confirm management execution has remained intact. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterC-suite changes do not inherently impair results; if incoming leadership brings fresh operational discipline, the change may prove a net positive rather than a headwind. | ||
CounterA low multiple in a thin-margin, no-moat auto dealership may simply reflect structural earnings risk; with revenue declining 1% and quality metrics below the minimum threshold, the discount may persist or widen rather than close.
CounterAt 6.7 times forward earnings, the market has already priced in significant quality concerns; even modest stabilization in margins could trigger a re-rating without requiring a fundamental business transformation.
CounterMACD is improving and volume accumulation is rising, suggesting buyers are stepping in at current levels; if these shorter-term signals prove durable, the recovery may be closer than the long-term average implies.
CounterC-suite changes do not inherently impair results; if incoming leadership brings fresh operational discipline, the change may prove a net positive rather than a headwind.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.5 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.9 |
| Net margin | 1.3 |
| Moat | 3.2 |
| Piotroski F | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.5 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 7.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.5 |
| Analyst rating | 7.0 |
| Price target | 7.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.9 |
| quality rank | 4.0 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.9 |
| 52w position | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.7 |
| days to cover | 6.2 |
| volatility | 2.4 |
| put call | 8.8 |
| implied vol | 5.4 |
| debt equity | 4.2 |
| news risk | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.5 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 70
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.5B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's 0.1<1.5@spot outcome against Value at 8.8 and asymmetric R:R of 0.08.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.8, Momentum at 7.3, and Sentiment at 6.9; the weakest are Growth at 0.2, Quality at 1.3, and Technical at 2.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.08 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward P/E expands above 10x, eliminating the valuation discount that underpins the thesis.
Trip ifStock price breaks above $210 and sustains above it for 2 consecutive weeks, crossing above the max pain level and reversing the downtrend signal.
Trip ifQuality score recovers above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters, clearing the minimum acceptable threshold.
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters following the management change, demonstrating execution continuity.