Value
7.4/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.9 |
| P/S | 9.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.03
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Revenue is declining about 1% year-over-year even as the stock trades at a deep discount (forward P/E near 7.5x, PEG 0.03), raising the question of whether the cheap valuation is a real opportunity or a shrinking business. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should turn positive, above 0% YoY, if the valuation gap reflects a genuine opportunity rather than a value trap. | →Stable |
| CounterThe bull case still flags an attractive valuation, and cheap multiples can persist for structurally challenged software companies without ever re-rating. | ||
The stock is in an overbought bear-market rally with RSI at 83 while still trading below its 200-day moving average with a confirmed downtrend (MA slope -9.7%/30 days). Momentum breakdown | The 200-day MA slope should turn positive if the recent bounce marks a genuine trend reversal rather than a temporary rally. | →Stable |
| CounterRising on-balance volume in the same data suggests real buying interest, not just a technical head-fake. | ||
The engine's asymmetry gate failed at -0.9, reflecting negative risk-reward as the analyst target has already been reached and leverage (D/E 9.2) further penalizes the setup. Engine gate (failed) | Asymmetry ratio should turn positive and clear 1.5 if the risk-reward setup improves. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh leverage combined with negative asymmetry could also foreshadow deeper price declines rather than a resolvable near-term setup. | ||
Yext has fallen 46% from its 52-week high, more than the engine's 40% threshold for flagging speculative-only names, and its $0.5B market cap keeps it below institutional reach. Suitability rationale | Drawdown from the 52-week high should narrow below 40% if the stock stabilizes. | →Stable |
| CounterSmall, thinly institutionally-owned stocks in sustained downtrends can continue making new lows without a floor. | ||
CounterThe bull case still flags an attractive valuation, and cheap multiples can persist for structurally challenged software companies without ever re-rating.
CounterRising on-balance volume in the same data suggests real buying interest, not just a technical head-fake.
CounterHigh leverage combined with negative asymmetry could also foreshadow deeper price declines rather than a resolvable near-term setup.
CounterSmall, thinly institutionally-owned stocks in sustained downtrends can continue making new lows without a floor.
Yext trades at a statistically cheap valuation but shows declining revenue, an overbought technical bounce inside a confirmed downtrend, and a negative asymmetry reading, adding up to a genuinely unfavorable risk-reward setup.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.9 |
| P/S | 9.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 0.5 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 4.6 |
| Net margin | 4.5 |
| Current ratio | 3.2 |
| FCF quality | 5.6 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.1 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 2.8 |
| MACD | 8.3 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 1.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.2 |
| erm sentiment | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| insider conviction | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.3 |
| quality rank | 7.5 |
| growth rank | 0.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.7 |
| support resistance | 1.8 |
| 52w position | 0.7 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.5 |
| days to cover | 6.9 |
| volatility | 1.6 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.7 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 6.5 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.5 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 8.6 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 73
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -46% (>40% off 52w high)
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Catalyst at 7.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.92 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Catalyst at 7.5, Value at 7.4, and Insider at 7.1; the weakest are Technical at 2.5, Peer rank at 3.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.92 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth exceeds 5% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifThe 200-day MA slope rises above 0%/30d from the current -9.7%/30d.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio rises above 1.5 from the current -0.9.
Trip ifDrawdown from the 52-week high narrows to less than 40%, from the current 46%.