Skip to main content
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc.Sell5.2·$190.71
VRSK · Why this verdict

Why Verisk Analytics (VRSK) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Verisk Analytics is a best-in-class data analytics franchise for U.S. property and casualty insurers, with a perfect 4-quarter earnings beat streak, operating margins of 29%, and a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, but the stock's near-term appeal is constrained by thin 10% upside to analyst targets, a confirmed downtrend, and heavy customer concentration in a single end market.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Verisk generates operating margins of 29% — best in class among consulting and data analytics peers — supported by a quality score of 8.0, strong return on assets, and gross margins in the top 10% of the universe.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Operating margins should remain above 27% over the next 12 months, maintaining the premium margin profile that justifies the higher-than-sector valuation multiple.

CounterThin revenue growth of approximately 4% limits the ability to expand margins further, and the business relies on a single customer segment — U.S. property and casualty insurers representing 70% of revenue — that could face pricing pressure in a soft insurance cycle.

Over 70% of revenue comes from U.S. property and casualty primary insurers, which is flagged as a high-concentration risk; however, this concentration also reflects deep product integration and high switching costs that make relationships durable.

↓Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
Revenue from the property and casualty insurance segment should grow at least 3% annually, in line with the broader insurance sector, over the next 12 months.

CounterIf the U.S. P&C insurance market enters a hard underwriting cycle that reduces insurer premiums and IT budgets, Verisk has no diversified revenue base to absorb the impact.

Verisk has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with an average positive surprise of 6.2% and consistent beats ranging from 0.96% to 12.92%, demonstrating disciplined financial guidance and reliable execution.

↓Deteriorating
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
The beat streak should extend to at least 6 consecutive quarters, with earnings per share continuing to grow and surprise positive in at least 3 of the next 4 reporting periods.

CounterA 6.2% average beat may reflect consistently conservative guidance rather than fundamental outperformance, and any reset of guidance expectations could end the streak without underlying business deterioration.

Despite a recovery setup with improving MACD and RSI at 64, the stock's 200-day moving average is declining at -6.8% over 30 days, and the death cross condition has been flagged — creating a technical headwind that delayed the entry case despite strong fundamentals.

→Stable
Gates warning
Expectation
The 200-day moving average slope should flatten and turn positive within 6 months, and the stock should hold above $175, roughly 3% below the current $180, confirming the recovery setup is intact.

CounterThe quality and momentum exemption that waived the death cross gate does not eliminate the underlying price trend; if the stock breaks below $168 support, the recovery thesis fails.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.4
P/S4.8
EV/EBITDA0.6
Fwd P/E5.9
PEG4.9
Analyst target6.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 21.9x
  • ▸PEG: 1.60

Quality

7.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROA10.0
Gross margin10.0
Op margin10.0
Net margin10.0
Current ratio4.0
FCF quality8.0
Moat5.9
Rule of 405.5
Piotroski F6.7
  • ▸Strong margins: 28%
  • ▸High-quality business

Growth

2.5/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.6
EPS growth1.3

Momentum

7.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position8.0
Volume4.4
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat

Sentiment

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment4.0
Analyst rating7.4
Price target7.5

Insider

3.6/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change2.8
notable moves3.0
  • ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $2,203,266 (0.009% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.4/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank0.6
quality rank8.8
growth rank3.3
  • ▸Best-in-class margins

Technical

3.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger3.4
support resistance3.2
52w position5.2

Risk (lower is worse)

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.0
days to cover7.3
volatility3.6
put call8.3
implied vol4.6
max pain risk3.0
beta8.8
  • ▸Above max pain $140
  • ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg5.1
dividend safety8.5
news activity5.0
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • ▸Earnings in 5 days
  • ▸Dividend aristocrat: 1.1% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:7.5>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • DEATH_CROSS:QUALITY_MOMENTUM_EXEMPT
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:0.5<1.5@spot
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:5d<=7d
Warning (1)
  • DEATH_CROSS:quality=7.8>=7.5+momentum=7.5>=5.0 exempted
Reward-to-Risk
0.46
Upside
+6.9%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupMomentum Cont — Trend continuation, RSI 63, MACD bullish

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.7 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 7.8) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:0.5<1.5@spot, EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:5d<=7d) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.46 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.8, Momentum at 7.5, and Catalyst at 6.4; the weakest are Growth at 2.5, Insider at 3.6, and Technical at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.46 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Perfect Earnings Beat Streak

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters.

  • P2Best In Class Margin Profile

    Trip ifOperating margin falls below 25%, more than 4 percentage points below the current 29% level, for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3Customer Concentration Single Sector

    Trip ifRevenue growth from the P&C insurance segment declines to below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P4Downtrend Momentum Headwind

    Trip ifStock price falls below $168, more than 7% below the current $180.46, and the 200-day moving average slope remains negative after 90 days.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › VRSK › Why this verdict