Skip to main content
VGNTVersigent PLCSell5.6·$41.49
VGNT · Why this verdict

Why Versigent (VGNT) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Versigent is a cheap auto-parts supplier (5.4x forward P/E) with a strong latest earnings beat and a 19% gap to the analyst target, but below-floor business quality, heavy insider selling and steep negative momentum argue against adding.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Business quality is below the engine's 4.0 floor at 3.7/10, with low operating margin and net margin scores (3.5 and 2.8 out of 10) and no competitive moat.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Operating and net margins improve enough to lift the quality score above 4.0 within 12 months.

CounterThin margins are typical of auto-parts suppliers and revenue growth from $2.2B to $2.4B per quarter could drive operating leverage.

Valuation is inexpensive, with a forward P/E of 5.4x and a PEG of 0.62, and the $49.40 analyst target is about 19.3% above the $41.40 price.

↑Improving
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Price closes part of the 19.3% gap to the $49.40 analyst target over 12 months as earnings hold.

CounterAuto-parts earnings are cyclical, so a low forward P/E may reflect peak-earnings risk, and only light analyst coverage dampens the target signal.

Revenue is growing, with quarterly revenue up from $2.21B to $2.44B over the last two reported quarters, and the latest EPS of $1.92 beat the $1.44 estimate by 33%.

→Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Quarterly revenue holds near the $2.42B next-quarter estimate and EPS continues to beat over the next reports.

CounterOnly one quarter of earnings history is available, so a single beat says little about consistency.

Momentum is very weak at 1.7/10, with an RSI near 21, price below its 200-day average and falling on-balance volume.

↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
RSI recovers above 40 and the momentum score rises above 4.5 within 12 months.

CounterAn RSI of 21 marks an oversold extreme that often precedes a rebound, and capitulation can be the low point.

Insiders sold about $10.1M in the last 90 days (0.343% of market cap) with no buying, and the put/call ratio is an elevated 4.00.

→Stable
Insider breakdown
Expectation
Insider selling slows to near zero and the put/call ratio falls below 1.5 over the next 12 months.

CounterInsider sales are often pre-planned or tied to compensation, and institutions are accumulating according to the holder-change signal.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E9.8
P/S10.0
EV/EBITDA8.6
Fwd P/E9.9
PEG9.3
Analyst target7.5
  • ▸Forward P/E: 5.4x
  • ▸PEG: 0.62
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

3.7/10data confidence 86%
ComponentSub-score
Gross margin0.0
Op margin3.5
Net margin2.8
Current ratio5.2
Moat5.0
Piotroski F5.6
  • ▸No competitive moat

Growth

4.5/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth5.2
EPS growth3.7

Momentum

2.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.5
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position2.5
Volume3.2
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)

Sentiment

7.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating8.0
Price target9.0
erm sentiment5.1
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (9.0) — signal dampened
  • ▸Analyst upside: 37%

Insider

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality3.0
insider conviction2.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • ▸Notable insider selling — $10,065,510 (0.342% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

5.6/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank8.8
quality rank6.2
growth rank7.4
  • ▸Attractive P/E vs peers

Technical

7.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger8.2
support resistance8.2
52w position6.4

Risk (lower is worse)

2.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
days to cover7.4
volatility4.1
put call0.8
implied vol2.3
max pain risk3.0
debt equity0.0
  • ▸Elevated put/call: 1.88
  • ▸High IV: 66%
  • ▸Above max pain $35

Catalyst

7.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
dividend safety7.0
  • ▸Earnings in 5 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (5)
  • ASYMMETRY:2.8>=1.5
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:2.0<4.5
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:5d<=7d
Warning (1)
  • INSIDER:0.34%=MODERATE
Reward-to-Risk
2.83
Upside
+19.1%
Downside
6.7%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $2.9B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.0<4.5 outcome against Value at 9.1 and asymmetric R:R of 2.83.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.1, Sentiment at 7.6, and Technical at 7.6; the weakest are Momentum at 2.0, Risk (lower is worse) at 2.9, and Quality at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.83 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Cheap Valuation Analyst Gap

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 9x from the current 5.4x without a rise in the analyst target above $49.40.

  • P2Thin Margin Low Quality

    Trip ifNet margin component falls below 2/10 from the current 2.8, or quality score drops below 3.0 from 3.7.

  • P3Revenue Growth And Beat

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $2.2B from the latest $2.44B.

  • P4Steep Negative Momentum

    Trip ifShare price drops to below the $38.90 support level.

  • P5Insider Selling And Put Skew

    Trip ifInsider selling exceeds $20M over 90 days from the current $10.1M.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › VGNT › Why this verdict