Value
6.3/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.2 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 24.2x
SIM · Why this verdict
Why Grupo Simec (SIM) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Grupo Simec is a steel producer with best-in-class margins and conservative debt, but a falling-knife chart (RSI 12, death cross), a 50% FCF/net income red flag and an earnings record that is stale and mostly misses leave the case unproven.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The chart is in a steep decline: a death cross, price below all moving averages, RSI at 12, bearish MACD and falling on-balance volume. Chart pattern detection | Price stabilizes and momentum recovers above 4.5/10 over the coming quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterAn RSI of 12 is extremely oversold, which often precedes a sharp relief rally even in a confirmed downtrend. | ||
Valuation is not clearly cheap on earnings, with a forward P/E of 24.1x despite a strong price-to-sales component of 10/10. Valuation breakdown | Forward earnings rise enough to bring the forward P/E below 15x. | ↑Improving |
| CounterForward estimates for a steel producer after a 2018-2019 earnings record are thin, and the forward multiple may fall quickly if earnings recover. | ||
The earnings record shows 3 misses and 1 beat in the four most recent reports, averaging a -13.2% surprise. Bear case | EPS comes in above estimates for at least two consecutive reports. | →Stable |
| CounterThe earnings data supplied is dated 2018-2019 and no upcoming report date is available, so this record may not reflect current performance. | ||
Simec ranks best in class on margins with conservative debt, giving a peer quality rank of 7.7/10 and a debt-to-equity component of 10/10. Peer-rank breakdown | Margins and the low-debt balance sheet hold through the steel cycle. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterSteel margins are cyclical, so peer-leading margins at a cycle high can compress quickly if demand falls. | ||
Earnings quality is flagged as a red flag, with free cash flow at only 50% of net income, holding quality at 4.7/10. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow conversion improves above 80% of net income over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterWorking capital and capital spending swing with steel prices, so one year of 50% conversion may not be structural. | ||
The chart is in a steep decline: a death cross, price below all moving averages, RSI at 12, bearish MACD and falling on-balance volume.
→StableChart pattern detection
- Expectation
- Price stabilizes and momentum recovers above 4.5/10 over the coming quarters.
CounterAn RSI of 12 is extremely oversold, which often precedes a sharp relief rally even in a confirmed downtrend.
Valuation is not clearly cheap on earnings, with a forward P/E of 24.1x despite a strong price-to-sales component of 10/10.
↑ImprovingValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Forward earnings rise enough to bring the forward P/E below 15x.
CounterForward estimates for a steel producer after a 2018-2019 earnings record are thin, and the forward multiple may fall quickly if earnings recover.
The earnings record shows 3 misses and 1 beat in the four most recent reports, averaging a -13.2% surprise.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- EPS comes in above estimates for at least two consecutive reports.
CounterThe earnings data supplied is dated 2018-2019 and no upcoming report date is available, so this record may not reflect current performance.
Simec ranks best in class on margins with conservative debt, giving a peer quality rank of 7.7/10 and a debt-to-equity component of 10/10.
↓DeterioratingPeer-rank breakdown
- Expectation
- Margins and the low-debt balance sheet hold through the steel cycle.
CounterSteel margins are cyclical, so peer-leading margins at a cycle high can compress quickly if demand falls.
Earnings quality is flagged as a red flag, with free cash flow at only 50% of net income, holding quality at 4.7/10.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow conversion improves above 80% of net income over the next 12 months.
CounterWorking capital and capital spending swing with steel prices, so one year of 50% conversion may not be structural.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.9 |
| ROA | 3.1 |
| Gross margin | 1.1 |
| Op margin | 6.4 |
| Net margin | 5.5 |
| Current ratio | 7.2 |
| FCF quality | 4.0 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: 50% FCF/NI
Growth
6.4/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.4 |
Momentum
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 1.5 |
- ▸Capitulation risk (RSI 13, below 200MA)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope flat
Sentiment
5.4/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.9 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
6.7/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.9 |
| quality rank | 7.7 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
- ▸Best-in-class margins
- ▸Conservative debt levels
Technical
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 8.7 |
| support resistance | 7.2 |
| 52w position | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
9.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 7.1 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 10.0 |
Catalyst
2.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (5)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:3.6<4.5
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (1)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupFalling Knife — Death cross, below all MAs, RSI 13, MACD bearish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $4.0B<$5B
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.0 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 9.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.6<4.5, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.00 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 9.4, Technical at 7.0, and Peer rank at 6.7; the weakest are Catalyst at 2.8, Momentum at 3.6, and Quality at 4.7. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Consecutive Earnings Misses
Trip ifEPS surprise stays above 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Falling Knife Chart
Trip ifThe momentum score rises above 4.5 from the current 1.4.
- P3Best In Class Margins Low Debt
Trip ifThe peer quality rank falls below 5.0 from the current 7.7.
- P4Weak Cash Conversion
Trip ifFree cash flow to net income exceeds 80% from the current 50%.
- P5Rich Forward Earnings Multiple
Trip ifForward P/E falls below 15x from the current 24.1x.