Value
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.0 |
| P/S | 7.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.1 |
| PEG | 5.4 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 14.8x
- ▸PEG: 1.40
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
SEI Investments has delivered 4 consecutive earnings beats including a 48.8% beat, carries a 30% return on equity with a wide economic moat and top-tier quality score of 8.3 out of 10, but the stock has effectively reached its analyst target with only 1.8% remaining upside, limiting the near-term setup despite strong fundamentals.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company scores 8.3 out of 10 on business quality — the highest quality score in this batch — with a 30% return on equity, 31% net margins, and a wide economic moat designation, reflecting durable competitive advantages in investment management platforms and outsourced services. Quality breakdown | Quality score remains above 7.5 and return on equity stays above 25% in at least 3 of the next 4 reported quarters. | ↑Improving |
| CounterAsset management businesses see quality metrics compress when markets decline, as revenue is fee-based and tied to assets under management; a sustained equity market correction of 20% or more would reduce fees and margins proportionally. | ||
The company beat earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 16.3%, including a standout 48.8% beat in July 2025 that indicates strong operating leverage and consistent execution above analyst expectations. Earnings | The earnings beat streak extends to at least 6 consecutive quarters with an average positive surprise above 5%. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe 48.8% beat in July 2025 may be a one-quarter anomaly from a specific performance fee or asset realization; removing that outlier, the average surprise would be much lower and less distinctive as a signal. | ||
With only 1.8% upside to the analyst target of $91.23 from the current $89.57, and the reward-to-risk ratio at 0.5, the stock is priced to perfection at current levels, reducing the attractiveness of new entries even though the fundamental quality is excellent. Warnings | Analyst consensus price target rises above $105, more than 17% above the current $89.57, as continued beat-and-raise quarters prompt upward estimate revisions. | Tripped↑Improving |
| CounterIn high-quality compounder businesses, analyst targets are routinely exceeded and revised upward; the current thin upside may simply reflect the pace of target revision lagging actual business performance. | ||
The company ranks in the top third of its peer group on value, quality, and growth simultaneously — a rare combination in asset management — with a 7.1 out of 10 growth peer rank score reflecting that it is growing faster than most competitors while maintaining premium profitability. Peer-rank breakdown | The company maintains top-tercile peer ranking on at least 2 of the 3 peer rank dimensions over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterAsset management is a highly competitive sector with low barriers to entry for index-based products; the peer ranking advantage may erode as passive investing continues to shift fee pools away from active managers where SEI operates. | ||
CounterAsset management businesses see quality metrics compress when markets decline, as revenue is fee-based and tied to assets under management; a sustained equity market correction of 20% or more would reduce fees and margins proportionally.
CounterThe 48.8% beat in July 2025 may be a one-quarter anomaly from a specific performance fee or asset realization; removing that outlier, the average surprise would be much lower and less distinctive as a signal.
CounterIn high-quality compounder businesses, analyst targets are routinely exceeded and revised upward; the current thin upside may simply reflect the pace of target revision lagging actual business performance.
CounterAsset management is a highly competitive sector with low barriers to entry for index-based products; the peer ranking advantage may erode as passive investing continues to shift fee pools away from active managers where SEI operates.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.0 |
| P/S | 7.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.1 |
| PEG | 5.4 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 9.1 |
| ROA | 9.8 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.7 |
| FCF quality | 4.5 |
| Moat | 9.0 |
| Rule of 40 | 5.5 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.1 |
| EPS growth | 3.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 2.5 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 2.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.8 |
| Price target | 7.2 |
| erm sentiment | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.9 |
| quality rank | 6.5 |
| growth rank | 7.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.3 |
| support resistance | 5.8 |
| 52w position | 8.7 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.5 |
| days to cover | 6.9 |
| volatility | 7.2 |
| put call | 5.2 |
| implied vol | 7.1 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 7.2 |
| debt equity | 9.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.5 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.4 |
| dividend safety | 6.8 |
Wide-moat business. Accumulate on weakness.
L4:PATH_E_WIDE_MOAT|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDSetupRange Bound — RSI 50 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's 0.1<1.5@spot outcome against Quality at 8.6 and asymmetric R:R of 0.14.
The strongest dimensions are Quality at 8.6, Sentiment at 6.9, and Peer rank at 6.9; the weakest are Insider at 3.3, Growth at 4.7, and Momentum at 5.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.14 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifQuality score falls below 7.0 or return on equity drops below 20%, declining more than 10 percentage points from the current 30% level.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, breaking the 4-quarter beat streak.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $100, more than 11% above the current $89.57, confirming upward estimate revision momentum.
Trip ifPeer rank on quality falls below the 50th percentile for more than 2 consecutive quarters, indicating competitors are closing the quality gap.