Value
5.0/10data confidence 60%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.7 |
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The business quality score sits just below the engine's minimum floor (3.7 versus 4.0), a marginal shortfall that nonetheless keeps the position flagged for exit despite otherwise strong Piotroski fundamentals. Bear case | The quality score should climb back above the 4.0 floor as the earnings-quality concerns noted above resolve. | →Stable |
| CounterBeing only 0.3 points below the floor suggests this may be a borderline case rather than a genuine quality problem, and a small improvement could flip the signal. | ||
Resolute Holdings shows a stark earnings-quality red flag — free cash flow at -99% of net income — even though its Piotroski F-Score is a perfect 9 out of 9, suggesting reported earnings are not converting into actual cash. Quality breakdown | FCF/NI conversion should turn positive and move toward a sustainable range, above 50%, over the next several quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterA perfect Piotroski score alongside negative cash conversion could reflect a temporary working-capital build from growth investment rather than a structural earnings-quality problem. | ||
The V9 engine's asymmetry gate warns that upside is exhausted (0.0% upside to the resistance-based take-profit target), meaning the current price already reflects the near-term bullish case with 15% downside risk if sentiment turns. Gates warning | A more attractive entry should require either a pullback in price or a raised resistance/target level before asymmetry improves. | →Stable |
| CounterIf the stock breaks through resistance on strong volume, consistent with the rising on-balance volume trend, the take-profit target itself could reset higher, restoring upside without any price decline. | ||
The stock trades below its 200-day moving average, but that average is still rising at +6.9% over 30 days, which the engine interprets as a pullback within an intact uptrend rather than confirmed weakness. Momentum breakdown | Price should reclaim the 200-day moving average within the next few months if the pullback-in-uptrend read is correct. | →Stable |
| CounterA break below a still-rising 200-day moving average can also be an early sign that the uptrend is decelerating and about to reverse, especially if volume dries up. | ||
Insiders have been net buyers recently (signal: bullish, $148,700 across 2 purchases over 90 days), providing a modest positive counterpoint to the quality concerns. Insider transaction read | Insider buying should continue or at minimum not reverse into net selling over the next quarter. | →Stable |
| CounterAt just 0.012% of market cap, explicitly flagged by the engine as low materiality, this buying is too small to carry meaningful predictive signal. | ||
CounterBeing only 0.3 points below the floor suggests this may be a borderline case rather than a genuine quality problem, and a small improvement could flip the signal.
CounterA perfect Piotroski score alongside negative cash conversion could reflect a temporary working-capital build from growth investment rather than a structural earnings-quality problem.
CounterIf the stock breaks through resistance on strong volume, consistent with the rising on-balance volume trend, the take-profit target itself could reset higher, restoring upside without any price decline.
CounterA break below a still-rising 200-day moving average can also be an early sign that the uptrend is decelerating and about to reverse, especially if volume dries up.
CounterAt just 0.012% of market cap, explicitly flagged by the engine as low materiality, this buying is too small to carry meaningful predictive signal.
Resolute Holdings Management pairs a near-perfect Piotroski score and a bullish insider-buying signal against a stark earnings-quality red flag and upside already exhausted at the current price, leaving the position just below the engine's quality floor.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.7 |
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4 |
| ROA | 1.4 |
| Gross margin | 5.4 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 3.8 |
| Current ratio | 5.8 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.7 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 6.1 |
| MA position | 7.2 |
| Volume | 1.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.5 |
| holder change | 6.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.7 |
| quality rank | 3.8 |
| growth rank | 9.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.1 |
| support resistance | 4.0 |
| 52w position | 1.9 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.9 |
| days to cover | 5.5 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 6.7 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -40% (>40% off 52w high)
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Insider at 6.2 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 6.2, Peer rank at 6.0, and Momentum at 5.6; the weakest are Quality at 3.7, Technical at 3.8, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.0. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFCF/NI conversion stays below -50% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifQuality score falls below 3.0 out of 10 in the next quarterly refresh.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio rises above 1.5 from the current 0.0.
Trip ifThe 200-day moving average slope falls below 0% within the next 60 days.
Trip ifInsiders become net sellers, with sell value that exceeds $300,000 over a rolling 90-day period.